Advertisement

EU External Labor Governance: Pointing Fingers or Lending a Hand?

  • Myriam Oehri
Chapter
  • 151 Downloads
Part of the The European Union in International Affairs book series (EUIA)

Abstract

In line with the structure of the previous chapter, “EU External Labor Governance: Pointing Fingers or Lending a Hand?” is designed to illustrate how the EU promotes workers’ rights in Mexico, Morocco, and the Dominican Republic. Drawing on the analysis of the EU-Mexico GA, the EU-Morocco AA, the EU-CARIFORUM EPA, extensive interview data, and relevant documents, this chapter shows that EU external labor governance is characterized by mechanisms that address labor rights’ violations hierarchically and work on the enhancement of labor standards in a cooperative and horizontal manner. It furthermore reveals that the approach the EU relies on in practice is dominated by lending a hand rather than pointing fingers. The chapter concludes with a discussion on the generalizability of the case studies’ findings.

Keywords

Labor Governance Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) European Economic And Social Committee (EESC) European External Action Service (EEAS) Human Rights Clauses 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aaronson, S. A., & Zimmerman, J. M. (2008). Trade imbalance: The struggle to weigh human rights concerns in trade policymaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arestoff-Izzo, F., Bazillier, R., Duc, C., & Granger-Sarrazin, C. (2008). The use, scope and effectiveness of labour and social provisions and sustainable development aspects in bilateral and regional free trade agreements. Final Report, Brussels: European Commission. DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.Google Scholar
  3. Bartels, L. (2004). A legal analysis of human rights clauses in the European Union’s Euro-Mediterranean association agreements. Mediterranean Politics, 9(3), 368–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartels, L. (2005). Human rights conditionality in the EU’s international agreements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartels, L. (2013). Human rights and sustainable development obligations in EU free trade agreements. Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 40(4), 297–314.Google Scholar
  6. Behrens, M., & Janusch, H. (2012). Great “normative power:” The European and American trade approaches with Chile and Mexico. European Foreign Affairs Review, 17(3), 367–386.Google Scholar
  7. Beviglia Zampetti, A. (2011). Environment, social aspects and institutional provisions. In A. Beviglia Zampetti & J. Lodge (Eds.), The CARIFORUM-EU Economic Partnership Agreement: A Practitioners’ Analysis (pp. 179–198). Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  8. Condon, B. J. (2009). European Union-Mexico Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement. In S. Lester & B. Mercurio (Eds.), Bilateral and regional trade agreements: Case studies (pp. 74–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Damis, J. (1998). Morocco’s 1995 Association Agreement with the European Union. The Journal of North African Studies, 3(4), 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawson, C. (2009). EU integration with North Africa: Trade negotiations and democracy deficits in Morocco. London and New York: Tauris Academic Studies.Google Scholar
  11. De Lombaerde, P. (2003). The EU-Mexico Free Trade Agreement: Strategic and regulatory issues. Journal of European Studies, 11(2), 104–119.Google Scholar
  12. Durán, E. (1992). Mexico’s relations with the European Community. Madrid: Instituto De Relaciones Europeo-Latinoamericanas.Google Scholar
  13. Ebert, F. C. (2016). Labour provisions in EU trade agreements: What potential for channeling labour standards-related capacity building? International Labour Review, 155(3), 407–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ebert, F. C., & Posthuma, A. (2011). Labour provisions in trade arrangements: Current trends and perspectives. ILO Discussion Paper No. 205, Geneva.Google Scholar
  15. European Commission. (1995). The inclusion of respect for democratic principles and human rights in agreements between the Community and third countries. COM (95) 216, May 23.Google Scholar
  16. European Commission. (1996). The trading system and internationally recognized labour standards. COM (96) 402, July 24.Google Scholar
  17. European Commission. (2001). Promoting core labour standards and improving social governance in the context of globalisation. COM (2001) 412, July 18.Google Scholar
  18. European Commission. (2003). Reinvigorating EU actions on human rights and democratisation with Mediterranean partners: Strategic guidelines. COM (2003) 294, May 21.Google Scholar
  19. European Commission. (2006). Promoting decent work for all: The EU contribution to the implementation of the decent work agenda in the world. COM (2006) 249, May 24.Google Scholar
  20. European Commission. (2008). Towards an EU-Mexico strategic partnership. COM (2008) 447, July 15.Google Scholar
  21. European Council. (2005). Extending the period of application of the measures provided for by Decision 2002/148/EC concluding consultations with Zimbabwe under Article 96 of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement (Council Decision 139/2005). OJ, L48/28, February 19.Google Scholar
  22. European Parliament. (1999). Resolution on the Commission communication entitled “Democratisation, the rule of law, respect for human rights and good governance: The challenges of the partnership between the European Union and the ACP states. COM, 146(98), (1999), OJC 104/185, April 14.Google Scholar
  23. European Parliament. (2000). Resolution on the annual report on international human rights and European Union human rights policy, A5-0060/2000 (2000), OJ C 377/336, December 29.Google Scholar
  24. Faber, G., & Orbie, J. (2009a). EPAs between the EU and Africa: Beyond free trade? In G. Faber & J. Orbie (Eds.), Beyond market access for economic development: EU-Africa relations in transition (pp. 3–20). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Faber, G., & Orbie, J. (2009b). Everything but arms: Much more than appears at first sight. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(4), 767–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fierro, E. (2001). Legal basis and scope of the human rights clauses in EC bilateral agreements: Any room for positive interpretations? European Law Journal, 7(1), 41–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Freres, C. (2000). The European Union as a global “civilian power:” Development cooperation in EU-Latin American relations. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 42(2), 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grosse Ruse-Kahn, H., & Ononaiwu, C. (2015). The CARIFORUM-EU Economic Partnership Agreement. In S. Lester, B. Mercurio, & L. Bartels (Eds.), Bilateral and regional trade agreements: Case studies (pp. 133–160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gstöhl, S. (2009). The social dimension of EU neighbourhood policies. In J. Orbie & L. Tortell (Eds.), The European Union and the social dimension of globalization: How the EU influences the world (pp. 62–80). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Haddadi, S. (2002). Two cheers for whom? The European Union and democratization in Morocco. Democratization, 9(1), 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heron, T. (2011). Asymmetric bargaining and development trade-offs in the CARIFORUM-European Union Economic Partnership Agreement. Review of International Political Economy, 18(3), 328–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Howard-Hassmann, R. E. (2010). Mugabe’s Zimbabwe, 2000-2009: Massive human rights violations and the failure to protect. Human Rights Quarterly, 32(4), 898–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hubermann, M. (2012). Odd couple: International trade and labor standards in history. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Humphrey, E., & Cossy, M. (2011). Implementing the economic partnership agreement: Challenges and bottlenecks in the CARIFORUM region. Discussion Paper No. 117, Maastricht: European Centre for Development Management.Google Scholar
  35. International Labor Organization. (2016). Assessment of labour provisions in trade and investment agreements. Studies on Growth with Equity, Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  36. Kenner, J. (2011). Labour clauses in EU preferential trade agreements: An analysis of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement. In K. W. Bagwell & P. C. Mavroidis (Eds.), Preferential trade agreements: A law and economics analysis (pp. 180–209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kerremans, B., & Martins Gistelinck, M. (2009b). Labour rights in EPAs: Can the EU-CARIFORUM EPA be a guide?. In G. Faber & J. Orbie (Eds.), Beyond market access for economic development: EU-Africa relations in transition (pp. 304–321). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Kreutz, J. (2005). Hard measures by a soft power? Sanctions policy of the European Union 1981–2004. Paper No. 45, Bonn: Bonn International Center for Conversion.Google Scholar
  39. Lacomba, J., & Escala Rabadán, L. (2013). Limits and challenges for the participation of migrants’ associations in state development policies in Morocco and Mexico. International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 23(1), 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lazo Grandi, P. (2009). Trade agreements and their relation to labour standards. Issue Paper No. 3, Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meyn, M. (2008). Economic partnership agreements: A “historic step” towards a “partnership of equals”? Development Policy Review, 26(5), 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Montoute, A. (2011). Civil society participation in EPA implementation: How to make the EPA Joint CARIFORUM-EC Consultative Committee work effectively? Discussion Paper No. 119, Maastricht: European Centre for Development Management.Google Scholar
  43. Musset, A. (2001). L’intégration américaine: le puzzle des états, la mosaïque des traits. In A. Musset & V. M. Soria (Eds.), ALENA-MERCOSUR: Enjeux et limites de l’intégration américaine (pp. 7–24). Paris: INTAM-IHEAL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Orbie, J., & Tortell, L. (2009a). From the social clause to the social dimension of globalization. In J. Orbie & L. Tortell (Eds.), The European Union and the social dimension of globalization: How the EU influences the world (pp. 1–26). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Orbie, J., & Tortell, L. (2009b). The new GSP+ beneficiaries: Ticking the box or truly consistent with ILO findings? European Foreign Affairs Review, 14(5), 663–681.Google Scholar
  46. Portela, C. (2010). European Union sanctions and foreign policy: When and why do they work? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Riedel, E., & Will, M. (1999). Human rights clauses in external agreements of the EEC. In P. Alston (Ed.), The EU and Human Rights (pp. 723–754). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Sanahuja, J. A. (2000). Trade, politics, and democratization: The 1997 Global Agreement between the European Union and Mexico. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 42(2), 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schukat, P. (2008). CARIFORUM EPA and beyond: Recommendations for negotiations on services and trade related issues in EPAs. GTZ Study on Social Aspects and Environment, German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) Working Paper.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, K. E. (1998). The use of political conditionality in the EU’s relations with third countries: How effective? European Foreign Affairs Review, 3(2), 253–274.Google Scholar
  51. Szymanski, M., & Smith, M. E. (2005). Coherence and conditionality in European foreign policy: Negotiating the EU-Mexico Global Agreement. Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(1), 171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van den Putte, L. (2015). Involving civil society in social clauses and the decent work agenda. Global Labour Journal, 6(2), 221–235.Google Scholar
  53. Van den Putte, L., Bossuyt, F., Orbie, J., & De Ville, F. (2013). Social norms in EU bilateral trade agreements: A comparative overview, Centre for the Law of EU External Relations Working Paper No. 4, The Hague.Google Scholar
  54. Van Hüllen, V. (2012). Europeanisation through cooperation? EU democracy promotion in Morocco and Tunisia. West European Politics, 35(1), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vogt, J. (2015b). A little less conversation: The EU and the (non) application of labour conditionality in the generalized system of preferences (GSP). The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 31(3), 285–304.Google Scholar
  56. Zabludovsky, J. (2001). The Mexico-EU Free Trade Agreement: A strategic instrument to position Mexico as the transatlantic hub for trade and investment. European Foreign Affairs Review, 6(2), 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zisenwine, D. (2013). Mohammed VI and Moroccan foreign policy. In B. Maddy-Weitzman & D. Zisenwine (Eds.), Contemporary Morocco: State, politics and society under Mohammed VI (pp. 70–81). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Dür, A. (2007). EU trade policy as protection for exporters: The agreements with Mexico and Chile. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4), pp. 833–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Myriam Oehri
    • 1
  1. 1.Global Studies InstituteUniversity of GenevaGenèveSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations