Advertisement

Introduction: International Promotion of Labor Standards

  • Myriam Oehri
Chapter
  • 157 Downloads
Part of the The European Union in International Affairs book series (EUIA)

Abstract

The book’s introduction draws attention to the increasing trend of linking labor standards to trade policy. In order to systematically examine how the USA and the EU promote workers’ rights in trade agreements and in practice, Oehri offers an innovative theoretical framework, which is informed by the external governance literature. The suggested ideal types of external labor governance, comprising sanction-based enforcement mechanisms as well as cooperative dialog and assistance, enable to comparatively assess US and EU labor standards promotion in third states. In “International Promotion of Labor Standards” Oehri furthermore introduces the methodological approach consisting of a qualitative comparative case study design and highlights why Mexico, Morocco, and the Dominican Republic are target states highly promising for an assessment from an external labor governance perspective.

References

  1. Aaronson, S. A., & Zimmerman, J. M. (2008). Trade imbalance: The struggle to weigh human rights concerns in trade policymaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A.-M., & Snidal, D. (2000). The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adriaensen, J., & González-Garibay, M. (2013). The illusion of choice: The European Union and the trade-labor linkage. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 9(4), 542–559.Google Scholar
  4. Aspinwall, M. (2013). Side effects: Mexican governance under NAFTA’s labor and environmental agreements. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baccini, L., Dür, A., Elsig, M., & Milewicz, K. (2011). The design of preferential trade agreements: A new dataset in the making. WTO Staff Working Paper, Economic Research and Statistics Division, Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
  6. Bach, D., & Newman, A. L. (2007). The European regulatory state and global public policy: Micro-institutions, macro-influence. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(6), 827–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartels, L. (2005). Human rights conditionality in the EU’s international agreements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartow, A. M. (1990). The rights of workers in Mexico. Comparative Labor Law Journal, 11, 182–202.Google Scholar
  9. Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Befort, S. E., & Cornett, V. E. (1996). Beyond the rhetoric of the NAFTA treaty debate: A comparative analysis of labor and employment law in Mexico and the United States. Comparative Labor Law Journal, 17, 269–313.Google Scholar
  11. Behrens, M., & Janusch, H. (2012). Great “normative power:” The European and American trade approaches with Chile and Mexico. European Foreign Affairs Review, 17(3), 367–386.Google Scholar
  12. Benz, A., Breitmeier, H., Schimank, U., & Simonis, G. (2011). Vorwort. In G. Simonis & H. Elbers (Eds.), Externe EU-Governance (pp. 11–12). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  13. Berg, B. L. (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  14. Bernier, B. L. (2003). Sugar cane slavery: Bateyes in the Dominican Republic. New England Journal of International and Comparative Law, 9(1), 17–45.Google Scholar
  15. Blatter, J., & Haverland, M. (2012). Designing case studies: Explanatory approaches in small-N research. Research Methods Series. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blatter, J., Janning, F., & Wagemann, C. (2007). Qualitative Politikanalyse: Eine Einführung in Forschungsansätze und Methoden. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  17. Börzel, T. A. (2010). European governance: Negotiation and competition in the shadow of hierarchy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(2), 191–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bossuyt, F. (2009). The social dimension of the new generation of EU free trade agreements with Asia and Latin America: Ambitious continuation for the sake of policy coherence. European Foreign Affairs Review, 14(5), 703–722.Google Scholar
  19. Bronstein, A. (2009). International and comparative labour law: Current challenges. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan/Geneva: International Labour Organization.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Buchanan, R., & Chaparro, R. (2008). International institutions and transnational advocacy: The case of the North American Agreement on Labour Cooperation. CLPE Research Paper Series No. 22, 4(5), 1–37.Google Scholar
  21. Burgoon, B. (2009). The distinct politics of the European Union’s “fair trade” linkage to labour standards. European Foreign Affairs Review, 14(5), 643–661.Google Scholar
  22. Cammett, M., & Pripstein Posusney, M. (2010). Labor standards and labor market flexibility in the Middle East: Free trade and freer unions? Studies in Comparative International Development, 45(2), 250–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Campling, L., Harrison, J., Richardson, B., & Smith, A. (2016). Working beyond the border? A new research agenda for the evaluation of labour standards in EU trade agreements. International Labour Review, 155(3), 357–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chase, C., Yanovich, A., Crawford, J.-A., & Ugaz, P. (2013). Mapping of dispute settlement mechanisms in regional trade agreements: Innovative or variations on a theme? Staff Working Paper ERSD, July, Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
  25. Christiansen, T., Petito, F., & Tonra, B. (2000). Fuzzy politics around fuzzy borders: The European Union’s “near abroad.” Cooperation and Conflict, 35(4), 389–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Compa, L. (1995). The first NAFTA labor cases: A new international labor rights regime takes shape. U.S.-Mexico Law Journal, 3, 159–181.Google Scholar
  27. Czada, R. (2007). Markt. In A. Benz, S. Lütz, U. Schimank, & G. Simonis (Eds.), Handbuch Governance: Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendungsfelder (pp. 68–81). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dawar, K. (2008). Assessing labour and environmental regimes in regional trading agreements. Working Paper No. 55(8), Society of International Economic Law.Google Scholar
  29. De Ville, F., & Siles-Brügge, G. (2016). TTIP: The truth about the transatlantic trade and investment partnership. Cambridge and Malden: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Deacon, B. (2007). Global social policy and governance. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, DC: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Doumbia-Henry, C., & Gravel, E. (2006). Free trade agreements and labour rights: Recent developments. International Labour Review, 145(3), 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Drezner, D. (2007). All politics is global: Explaining international regulatory regimes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Dür, A., Baccini, L., & Elsig, M. (2014). The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset. Review of International Organizations, 9(3), 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ebert, F. C., & Posthuma, A. (2011). Labour provisions in trade arrangements: Current trends and perspectives. ILO Discussion Paper No. 205, Geneva.Google Scholar
  35. Elliott, K. A. (2004). Labor standards, development, and CAFTA. International Economics Policy Briefs No. PB04-2, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics and the Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
  36. Elliott, K. A., & Freeman, R. B. (2003). Can labor standards improve under globalization?. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  37. Evans, G., & Newnham, J. (1998). The penguin dictionary of international relations, available at http://www.himalayancrossings.com/pdf/course/resource/penguin_dictionary.pdf (accessed May 2014).
  38. Finbow, R. G. (2006). The limits of regionalism: NAFTA’s labour accord. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  39. Frundt, H. J. (1998). Trade conditions and labor rights: U.S. initiatives, Dominican and Central American responses. Gainesville, FL: Florida University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2010). Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. González-Garibay, M. (2009). The trade-labour linkage from the eyes of the developing countries: A euphemism for protectionist practices. European Foreign Affairs Review, 14(5), 763–784.Google Scholar
  44. Grynberg, R., & Qalo, V. (2006). Labour standards in US and EU preferential trade agreements. Journal of World Trade, 40(4), 619–653.Google Scholar
  45. Haass, R. N. (1998). Introduction. In R. N. Haass (Ed.), Economic sanctions and American diplomacy (pp. 1–9). New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
  46. Haass, R. N., & O’Sullivan, M. L. (2000). Introduction. In R. N. Haass & M. L. O’Sullivan (Ed.), Honey and vinegar: Incentives, sanctions, and foreign policy (pp. 1–11). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  47. Hafner-Burton, E. (2009). Forced to be good: Why trade agreements boost human rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Hassel, A. (2008). The evolution of a global labour governance regime. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 21(2), 231–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty, volume 1: Rules and order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Hendrickx, F., Marx, A., Rayp, G., & Wouters, J. (2016). The architecture of global labor governance. International Labour Review, 155(3), 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Horn, H., Mavroidis, P. C., & Sapir, A. (2010). Beyond the WTO? An anatomy of EU and US preferential trade agreements. The World Economy, 33(1), 1565–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. International Labor Organization. (2013). Social dimensions of free trade agreements. IILS Studies on Growth with Equity, Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  53. International Labor Organization. (2016). Assessment of labour provisions in trade and investment agreements. Studies on Growth with Equity, Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  54. Kahn-Nisser, S. (2014). External governance, convention ratification and monitoring: The EU, the ILO and labour standards in EU accession countries. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 20(4), 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kay, T. (2011). NAFTA and the politics of labor transnationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kenner, J. (2011). Labour clauses in EU preferential trade agreements: An analysis of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement. In K. W. Bagwell & P. C. Mavroidis (Eds.), Preferential trade agreements: A law and economics analysis (pp. 180–209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., & Slaughter, A.-M. (2000). Legalized dispute resolution: Interstate and transnational. International Organization, 54(3), 457–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kerremans, B., & Martins Gistelinck, M. (2009a). Interest aggregation, political parties, labour standards and trade: Differences in the US and EU approaches to the inclusion of labour standards in international trade agreements. European Foreign Affairs Review, 14(5), 683–701.Google Scholar
  59. Kerremans, B., & Martins Gistelinck, M. (2009b). Labour rights in EPAs: Can the EU-CARIFORUM EPA be a guide?. In G. Faber & J. Orbie (Eds.), Beyond market access for economic development: EU-Africa relations in transition (pp. 304–321). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Kim, M. (2012). Ex ante due diligence: Formation of PTAs and protection of labor rights. International Studies Quarterly, 56(4), 704–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kissack, R. (2009). How to lose friends and alienate people? Uploading European labour standards into the ILO. Journal of European Social Policy, 19(2), 104–107.Google Scholar
  62. Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2009). Hierarchy, networks, or market: How does the EU shape environmental policy adoptions within and beyond its borders? Journal of European Public Policy, 16(6), 873–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lavenex, S. (2004). EU external governance in “wider Europe”. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 680–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lavenex, S. (2008). A governance perspective on the European neighborhood policy: Integration beyond conditionality? Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6), 938–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lavenex, S. (2014). The power of functionalist extension: How EU rules travel. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(6), 885–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lavenex, S., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2009). EU rules beyond borders: Theorizing external governance in European politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(6), 791–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lavenex, S., Lehmkuhl, D., & Wichmann, N. (2009). Modes of external governance: A cross-national and cross-sectoral comparison. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(6), 813–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lazo Grandi, P. (2009). Trade agreements and their relation to labour standards. Issue Paper No. 3, Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lipset, S. M. (1996). American exceptionalism: A double-edged sword. New York and London: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  70. Lynch, J. F. (2013). Aligning sampling strategies with analytic goals. In L. Mosley (Ed.), Interview research in political science (pp. 31–44). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Manners, I. (2002). Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms?. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Manners, I. (2008). The normative ethics of the European Union. International Affairs, 84(1), 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Manners, I. (2009). The social dimension of EU trade policies: Reflections from a normative power perspective. European Foreign Affairs Review, 14, 785–803.Google Scholar
  74. Marx, A., Wouters, J., Rayp, G., & Beke, L. (Eds.) (2015). Global governance of labour rights: Assessing the effectiveness of transnational public and private policy initiatives. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  75. Mayer, F. (1998). Interpreting NAFTA: The science and art of political analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Meardi, G., & Marginson, P. (2013). Global labour governance: Potential and limits of an emerging perspective. Paper prepared for the 2013 Work, Employment and Society Conference, Warwick, available at http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/wbs/research/irru/publications/recentconf/glg-wes.pdf (accessed January 2015).
  77. Meléndez-Ortiz, R. (2009). Foreword. In P. Lazo Grandi (Ed.), Trade agreements and their relation to labour standards (pp. v–vi). Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper No. 3.Google Scholar
  78. Milner, H. V. (1997). Interests, institutions, and information: Domestic politics and international relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Murillo, M. V., & Schrank, A. (2005). With a little help from my friends: Partisan politics, transnational alliances, and labor rights in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 38(8), 971–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Nolan García, K. A. (2010). Enforcement by design: The legalization of labor rights mechanisms in US trade policy. México, DF: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas.Google Scholar
  81. Nolan García, K. A. (2011a). The evolution of United States-Mexico labor cooperation (1994–2009): Achievements and challenges. Politics & Policy, 39(1), 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Nolan García, K. A. (2011b). Transnational advocates and labor rights enforcement in the North American Free Trade Agreement. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(2), 29–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Nye, J. (1990). Soft power. Foreign Policy, 80, 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Oehri, M. (2015a). Comparing US and EU labour governance “near and far:” Hierarchy vs. network?. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(5), 731–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Oehri, M. (2015b). EU and US governance of labor provisions in the Dominican Republic: De jure and de facto. Bulletin of Comparative Labour Relations, 89, 93–112.Google Scholar
  86. Orbie, J. (2011). Promoting labour standards through trade: Normative power or regulatory state Europe?. In R. G. Whitman (Ed.), Normative power Europe: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 160–183). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  87. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1996). Trade, employment and labour standards: A study of core workers’ rights and international trade. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  88. Payne, A. (2000). Globalization and modes of regionalist governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance (pp. 201–218). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Polaski, S. (2004). Protecting labor rights through trade agreements: An analytical guide. Journal of International Law and Policy, 10(13), 13–25.Google Scholar
  90. Porges, A. (2011). Dispute settlement. In J. Chauffour & J. Maur (Eds.), Preferential trade agreement policies for development: A handbook (pp. 467–501). Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Postnikov, E. (2013). Lobbying for good: Social standards in EU and U.S. trade agreements. Paper prepared for the European Union Studies Association Biennial Conference, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  92. Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.Google Scholar
  93. Risse, T., & Ropp, S. C. (2014). Introduction and overview. In T. Risse, S. C. Ropp, & K. Sikkink (Eds.), The persistent power of human rights: From commitment to compliance (pp. 3–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Rosell, S. A. E. A. (1992). Governing in an information society. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar
  95. Rosenau, J. N. (1992). Governance, order, and change in world politics. In J. N. Rosenau & E.-O. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without government: Order and change in world politics (pp. 1–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Rosenau, J. N. (1995). Governance in the twenty-first century. Global Governance, 1(1), 13–43.Google Scholar
  97. Sari, D., & Kucera, D. (2011). Measuring progress towards the application of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights: A tabular presentation of the findings of the ILO supervisory system. Working Paper No. 99, Geneva: Policy Integration Department International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  98. Sbragia, A. (2011). The EU, the US, and trade policy: Competitive interdependence in the management of globalization. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(3), 368–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2004). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 661–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Schimmelfennig, F., & Wagner, W. (2004). Preface: External governance in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 657–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Schrank, A. (2013). From disguised protectionism to rewarding regulation: The impact of trade-related labor standards in the Dominican Republic. Regulation & Governance, 7(3), 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Stallings, B. (2010). Globalization and labor in four developing regions: An institutional approach. Studies in Comparative International Development, 45(2), 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Tömmel, I. (2009). Modes of governance and the institutional structure of the European Union. In I. Tömmel & A. Verdun (Eds.), Innovative governance in the European Union (pp. 9–26). Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  104. Van den Putte, L. (2015). Involving civil society in social clauses and the decent work agenda. Global Labour Journal, 6(2), 221–235.Google Scholar
  105. Van den Putte, L., Bossuyt, F., Orbie, J., & De Ville, F. (2013). Social norms in EU bilateral trade agreements: A comparative overview, Centre for the Law of EU External Relations Working Paper No. 4, The Hague.Google Scholar
  106. Van Hüllen, V. (2012). Europeanisation through cooperation? EU democracy promotion in Morocco and Tunisia. West European Politics, 35(1), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Vandenberghe, J. (2008). On carrots and sticks: The social dimension of EU trade policy. European Foreign Affairs Review, 13, 561–581.Google Scholar
  108. Weiss, M. S. (2003). Two steps forward, one step back - or vice versa: Labor rights under free trade agreements from NAFTA, through Jordan, via Chile, to Latin America, and beyond. University of San Francisco Law Review, 37, 689–756.Google Scholar
  109. Weiss, T. G. (2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21(5), 795–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Wunderlich, D. (2012). The limits of external governance: Implementing EU external migration policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(9), 1414–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, DC: Sage.Google Scholar
  113. Farrell, M. (2005). EU external relations: Exporting the EU model of governance? European Foreign Affairs Review, 10(4), 451–462.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Myriam Oehri
    • 1
  1. 1.Global Studies InstituteUniversity of GenevaGenèveSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations