Highlighting Timely Information in Libraries Through Social and Semantic Web Technologies

  • Ioannis Papadakis
  • Konstantinos KyprianosEmail author
  • Apostolos Karalis
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 672)


Until now, timeliness of information in libraries is commonly used to underpin collection development and is directly related to quality in terms of realizing whether information is sufficiently up-to-date and available for use.

In this paper, it is argued that timely information could be exploited from libraries in another context. More specifically, it would be meaningful for the users of a library to explore resources based on their relevancy to popular events that occasionally occur to the society. Along these lines, a prototype digital library service is implemented and accordingly deployed, based on popular crowdsourcing services (i.e. Twitter) that are integrated with semantic web technologies. The proposed service is evaluated in terms of its ability to provide accurate and timely information.


Information timeliness Social web Twitter Hashtags DBpedia Semantic web Linked data 


  1. 1.
    Goncalves, M.A., Moreira, B.L., Fox, E.A., Watson, L.T.: What is a good digital library? – a quality model for digital libraries. Inf. Process. Manage. 43, 1416–1437 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miller, H.: The multiple dimensions of information quality. Inf. Syst. Manage. 13(2), 79–82 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, P.: What is web? 2.0 ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technol. Stand. Watch 1(1), 1–64 (2007). Accessed 09 Jun 2016Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lwoga, E.T.: Measuring the success of library 2.0 technologies in the african context: the suitability of the DeLone and McLean’s model. Campus-Wide Inf. Syst. 30(4), 288–307 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lawson, K.G.: Mining social tagging data for enhanced subject access for readers and researchers. J. Acad. Librariansh. 35(6), 574–582 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spitieri, L.: User-generated metadata: boon or bust for indexing and controlled vocabularies? (2014). Accessed 11 Jun 2016
  7. 7.
    Cunha, E., Magno, G., Comarcel, G., Almeida, V., Goncalves, M.A., Benevenuto, F.: Analyzing the dynamic evolution of hashtags on twitter: a language-based approach. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Language in Social Media (LSM 2011), pp. 58–65 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Movahedian, H., Khayyambashi, M.R.: Folksonomy-based User interest and disinterest profiling for improved recommendations: an ontological approach. J. Inf. Sci. 40(5), 594–610 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith, I.M.: What do we know about public library use? Aslib Proc. 51(9), 302–314 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agee, J.: Collection evaluation: a foundation for collection development. Collect. Build. 24(3), 92–95 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knievel, J.E., Wicht, H., Connaway, S.L.: Use of circulation statistics and interlibrary loan data in collection management. Coll. Res. Libr. 67(1), 35–49 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Covey, D.T.: Usage and Usability Assessment: Library Practices and Concerns. Digital Library Federation, CLIR, Washington (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weaver-Meyers, P., Stolt, W.: Delivery speed, timeliness and satisfaction. J. Libr. Adm. 23(1–2), 23–42 (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gerolimos, M., Konsta, R.: Services for academic libraries in New Era. D-Lib Mag. 17(7/8), 1 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walia, P.K., Gupta, M.: Application of web 2.0 tools by national libraries. Webology 9(2), 21–30 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Linh, N.C.: A survey of the application of Web 2.0 in Australian university libraries. Libr. Hi Tech 26(4), 630–653 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mahmood, K., Richardson Jr., J.V.: Impact of web 2.0 technologies on academic libraries: a survey of ARL libraries. Electron. Libr. 31(4), 508–520 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Teevan, J., Ramage, D., Morris, M.R.: #TwitterSearch: a comparison of microblog search and web search. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM 2011), pp. 35–44 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lau, C.H., Li, Y., Tjondronegoro, D.: Microblog retrieval using topical features and query expansion. In: Text REtrieval Conference (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Crawley-Low, J.V.: Collection analysis techniques used to evaluate a graduate-level toxicology collection. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 90(3), 310–316 (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hyödynmaa, M., Ahlholm-Kannisto, A., Nurminen, H.: How to evaluate library collections: a case study of collection mapping. Collect. Build. 29(2), 43–49 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Borin, J., Yi, H.: Indicators for collection evaluation: a new dimensional framework. Collect. Build. 27(4), 136–143 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Papadakis, I., Kyprianos, K., Stefanidakis, M.: Linked data URIs and libraries: the story so far. D-Lib Mag. 21(5/6), 5 (2015). doi: 10.1045/may2015-papadakis Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., Ives, Z.: DBpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) ASWC/ISWC -2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 722–735. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, P.K.: Measuring user influence in twitter: the million follower fallacy. In: Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM, pp. 10–17 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ioannis Papadakis
    • 1
  • Konstantinos Kyprianos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Apostolos Karalis
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Archives, Library Science and Museum StudiesIonian UniversityCorfuGreece
  2. 2.Department of InformaticsUniversity of PiraeusPiraeusGreece

Personalised recommendations