Advertisement

Mapping the Hierarchy of EAD to VRA Core 4.0 Through CIDOC CRM

  • Panorea GaitanouEmail author
  • Manolis Gergatsoulis
  • Dimitrios Spanoudakis
  • Lina Bountouri
  • Christos Papatheodorou
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 672)

Abstract

Metadata interoperability requires the development of mappings and crosswalks between different schemas. Crosswalks development is a laborious and complex task especially when metadata of compound objects include hierarchical structures. A typical case of such a complexity is finding aids that describe archives that include hierarchies of subordinate components. This paper makes a step forward to obtaining interoperability between two well-known metadata schemas, the EAD standard for the encoding of archival descriptions and the VRA Core 4.0 standard for describing compound visual resources. The paper presents an algorithm for mapping archival hierarchical structures expressed in the EAD standard to the VRA Core 4.0 standard. The input of the algorithm can be any EAD document as well as the crosswalk from EAD to VRA Core that has already been defined, by exploiting the mappings of both EAD and VRA Core 4.0 to the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. The output of the proposed process is a VRA Core 4.0 document that includes the information of the EAD document and represents its archival structure.

Keywords

Metadata interoperability Crosswalks Hierarchical structure Encoded Archival Description VRA Core 4.0 CIDOC CRM 

References

  1. 1.
    Gaitanou, P., Bountouri, L., Gergatsoulis, M.: Automatic generation of crosswalks through CIDOC CRM. In: Dodero, J.M., Palomo-Duarte, M., Karampiperis, P. (eds.) MTSR 2012. CCIS, vol. 343, pp. 264–275. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-35233-1_26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gaitanou, P., Gergatsoulis, M.: Defining a semantic mapping of VRA Core 4.0 to the CIDOC conceptual reference model. Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontol. 7(2), 140–156 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gergatsoulis, M., Bountouri, L., Gaitanou, P., Papatheodorou, C.: Mapping cultural metadata schemas to CIDOC conceptual reference model. In: Konstantopoulos, S., Perantonis, S., Karkaletsis, V., Spyropoulos, C.D., Vouros, G. (eds.) SETN 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6040, pp. 321–326. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-12842-4_37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gergatsoulis, M., Bountouri, L., Gaitanou, P., Papatheodorou, C.: Query transformation in a CIDOC CRM based cultural metadata integration environment. In: Lalmas, M., Jose, J., Rauber, A., Sebastiani, F., Frommholz, I. (eds.) ECDL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6273, pp. 38–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15464-5_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Godby, C.J., Smith, D., Childress, E.: Two paths to interoperable metadata. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications (DC). DCMI 2003, Seattle, Washington. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Godby, C.J., Smith, D., Childress, E.: Toward element-level interoperability in bibliographic metadata. Code4Lib J. (2) (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ICOM/CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group. Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model, Version 5.0.4, November 2011. http://www.cidoc-crm.org
  8. 8.
    Martin, D., Kondylakis, H., Plexousakis, D.: Mapping language for information integration. Technical report, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation of Research and Technology, December 2006Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hunter, J.: Combining the CIDOC CRM and MPEG-7 to describe multimedia in museums. In: Proceedings of the Museums and the Web International Conference. Museum Publications, Boston, April 2002Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Getty Research Institute. Metadata standards crosswalk (research at the getty). http://www.getty.edu/research/publications/electronic_publications/intrometadata/crosswalks.pdf
  11. 11.
    International Council on Archives. Committee on Descriptive Standards. ISAD(G): General International Standard Archival Description. ICA, 2nd edn. (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Library of Congress. EAD 2002 Schema (2002). http://www.loc.gov/ead/eadschema.html
  13. 13.
    Library of Congress. VRA CORE - a data standard for the description of works of visual culture: Official Web Site (Library of Congress) (2011). http://www.loc.gov/standards/vracore/
  14. 14.
    Lightle, K.S., Ridgway, J.S.: Generation of XML records across multiple metadata standards. D Lib Mag. 9(9) (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lourdi, I., Papatheodorou, C., Doerr, M.: Semantic integration of collection description: combining CIDOC/CRM and Dublin core collections application profile. D Lib Mag. 15(7/8) (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meghini, C., Risse, T.: Bricks: a digital library management system for cultural heritage. ERCIM News (61) (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ntousias, A., Gioldasis, N., Tsinaraki, C., Christodoulakis, S.: Rich metadata and context capturing through CIDOC/CRM and MPEG-7 interoperability. In: Luo, J., Guan, L., Hanjalic, A., Kankanhalli, M.S., Lee, I. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval, CIVR, Niagara Falls, 7–9 July 2008, pp. 151–160. ACM (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panorea Gaitanou
    • 1
    Email author
  • Manolis Gergatsoulis
    • 1
  • Dimitrios Spanoudakis
    • 2
  • Lina Bountouri
    • 1
  • Christos Papatheodorou
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratory on Digital Libraries and Electronic Publishing, Database and Information Systems Group (DBIS), Department of Archives, Library Science and MuseologyIonian UniversityCorfuGreece
  2. 2.Pervasive Computing Group, Department of Informatics and TelecommunicationsUniversity of AthensAthensGreece
  3. 3.Digital Curation Unit, Institute for the Management of Information Systems, Athena R.C.AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations