Advertisement

A Power Perspective on Software Ecosystem Partnerships

  • George ValençaEmail author
  • Carina Alves
  • Slinger Jansen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10027)

Abstract

To address today’s market demands for continuous enhancement of systems capabilities, software producing organisations have increasingly formed or joined software ecosystems. In these complex and networked settings, they define partnerships to complement each other’s features, acquire new skills, divide R&D costs and share customers. Such business model entails mutual dependence on companies for survival and effectiveness. It creates a flow of influence among them and makes the ecosystem resemble power-law distributions. Drawing on established concepts from Social and Behavioural Sciences, we performed an exploratory case study of six software companies to investigate their power-dependence relationships in an ecosystem environment. A prime result of this research is showing that it is possible to understand how power and dependence influence the behaviour and coordination of partner firms within a software ecosystem.

Keywords

Software ecosystem Open business model Partnerships Power Dependence Case study Software product management 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We thank Yang Zherui Ryan for his constructive feedback on early versions of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Alves, C., Oliveira, J., Jansen, S.: Software ecosystem governance – a systematic literature review and research agenda. Inf. Softw. Technol. (In submission)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barbosa, O., Pereira, R., Alves, C., Werner, C., Jansen, S.: A systematic mapping study on software ecosystems from a three-dimensional perspective. In: Jansen, S., Cusumano, M. A., Brinkkemper, S. (eds.) Software Ecosystems: Analyzing and Managing Business Networks in the Software Industry, pp. 59–81. Edward Elgar Publishing (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campbell, P.R.J., Ahmed, F.: A three-dimensional view of software ecosystems. In: Fourth European Conference on Software Architecture, pp. 81–84 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Casciaro, T., Piskorski, M.J.: Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: a closer look at resource dependence theory. Adm. Sci. Q. 50(2), 167–199 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cruzes, D.S., Dybå, T.: Recommended steps for thematic synthesis in software engineering. In: International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 275–284 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dahl, R.A.: The concept of power. Behav. Sci. 2(3), 201–215 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elias, S.: Fifty years of influence in the workplace: the evolution of the French and Raven power taxonomy. J. Manage. Hist. 14(3), 267–283 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Emerson, R.M.: Power-dependence relations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 27(1), 31–41 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hanssen, G., Dybå, T.: Theoretical foundations of software ecosystems. In: 4th International Workshop on Software Ecosystems, pp. 6–17 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hartigh, E., Tol, M., Visscher, W.: The health measurement of a business ecosystem. In: Annual Meeting of European Chaos and Complexity in Org. Network, pp. 1–39 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hurni, T., Huber, T.: The interplay of power and trust in platform ecosystems of the enterprise application software industry. In: European Conference on Information Systems (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iansiti, M., Levien, R.: Strategy as ecology. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(3), 68–81 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jansen, S., Finkelstein, A., Brinkkemper, S.: A sense of community: a research agenda for software ecosystems. In: 31st International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 187–190 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Souer, J., Luinenburg, L.: Shades of gray: Opening up a software producing organization with the open software enterprise model. J. Syst. Softw. 85(7), 1495–1510 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lacoste, S., Johnsen, R.E.: Supplier-customer relationships: a case study of power dynamics. J. Purchasing Supply Manage. 21(4), 229–240 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lawler, E.: Power processes in bargaining. Sociol. Q. 33(1), 17–34 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Manikas, K., Hansen, K.M.: Software ecosystems - A systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 86(5), 1294–1306 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meehan, J., Wright, G.H.: The origins of power in buyer–seller relationships. Ind. Mark. Manage. 41(4), 669–679 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Olsen, P.I., Prenkert, F., Hoholm, T., Harrison, D.: The dynamics of networked power in a concentrated business network. J. Bus. Res. 67(12), 2579–2589 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raven, B.H.: The bases of power: origins and recent developments. J. Soc. Issues 49(4), 227–251 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Romano, N.C., Donovan, C., Chen, H., Nunamaker, J.F.: A methodology for analyzing web-based qualitative data. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 19(4), 213–246 (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Runeson, P., Höst, M.: Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 14(2), 131–164 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Santos, R.P., Werner, C.: Treating business dimension in software ecosystems. In: International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, pp. 197–201 (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van Angeren, J., Kabbedijk, J., Jansen, S., Popp, K.M.: A survey of associate models used within large software ecosystems. In: 3rd International Workshop on Software Ecosystems, pp. 27–39 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van Angeren, J., Alves, C., Jansen, S.: Can we ask you to collaborate? Analyzing app developer relationships in commercial platform ecosystems. J. Syst. Softw. 113, 430–445 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weiblen, T.: Opening up the business model: Business model innovation through collaboration. Ph.D. Thesis. University of St. Gallen, Bamberg (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de InformáticaUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRecifeBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Information and Computing SciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations