Abstract
Requirements are often divided into functional requirements (FRs) and quality requirements (QRs). However, we still have little knowledge about to which extent this distinction makes sense from a practical perspective. In this paper, we report on a survey we conducted with 103 practitioners to explore whether and, if so, why they handle requirements labeled as FRs differently from those labeled as QRs. We additionally asked for consequences of this distinction w.r.t. the development process. Our results indicate that the development process for requirements of the two classes strongly differs (e.g., in testing). We identified a number of reasons why practitioners do (or do not) distinguish between QRs and FRs in their documentation and we analyzed both problems and benefits that arise from that. We found, for instance, that many reasons are based on expectations rather than on evidence. Those expectations are, in fact, not reflected in specific negative or positive consequences per se. It therefore seems more important that the decision whether to make an explicit distinction or not should be made consciously such that people are also aware of the risks that this distinction bears so that they may take appropriate countermeasures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
These were functional suitability, performance/efficiency, compatibility, usability, reliability, security, maintainability, and portability.
- 3.
The complete diagram including all codes is available at http://www4.in.tum.de/~eckharjo/DistinctionFishbone.pdf.
References
Ameller, D., Ayala, C., Cabot, J., Franch, X.: How do software architects consider non-functional requirements: an exploratory study. In: 20th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) (2012)
Borg, A., Yong, A., Carlshamre, P., Sandahl, K.: The bad conscience of requirements engineering: an investigation in real-world treatment of non-functional requirements. In: 3rd Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice in Sweden (SERPS) (2003)
Broy, M.: Rethinking nonfunctional software requirements: a novel approach categorizing system and software requirements. In: Software Technology: 10 Years of Innovation in IEEE Computer. John Wiley & Sons (2016)
Chung, L., Nixon, B.A.: Dealing with non-functional requirements: three experimental studies of a process-oriented approach. In: 17th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (1995)
Chung, L., do Prado Leite, J.C.S.: On non-functional requirements in software engineering. In: Borgida, A.T., Chaudhri, V.K., Giorgini, P., Yu, E.S. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications. LNCS, vol. 5600, pp. 363–379. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02463-4_19
Eckhardt, J., Vogelsang, A., Méndez Fernández, D.: Are non-functional requirements really non-functional? An investigation of non-functional requirements in practice. In: 38th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (2016)
Glinz, M.: On non-functional requirements. In: 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) (2007)
ISO/IEC: Systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE). ISO/IEC 25010, Geneva, Switzerland (2011)
ISO/IEC/IEEE: Systems and software engineering – Life cycle processes – Requirements engineering. ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2011(E), Geneva, Switzerland (2011)
Kitchenham, B.A., Pfleeger, S.L.: Personal opinion surveys. In: Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering. Springer, London (2008)
Mairiza, D., Zowghi, D., Nurmuliani, N.: An investigation into the notion of non-functional requirements. In: 25th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (2010)
Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., Nixon, B.: Representing and using nonfunctional requirements: a process-oriented approach. Trans. Softw. Eng. 18, 483–497 (1992)
Pohl, K.: Requirements Engineering: Fundamentals, Principles, and Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Robertson, S., Robertson, J.: Mastering the Requirements Process: Getting Requirements Right. Addison-Wesley (2012)
Sommerville, I., Kotonya, G.: Requirements Engineering: Processes and Techniques. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken (1998)
Stol, K., Raph, P., Fitzgerald, B.: Grounded theory in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines. In: 38th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (2016)
Berntsson Svensson, R., Gorschek, T., Regnell, B.: Quality requirements in practice: an interview study in requirements engineering for embedded systems. In: Glinz, M., Heymans, P. (eds.) REFSQ 2009. LNCS, vol. 5512, pp. 218–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02050-6_19
Van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In: 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (2001)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank M. Broy, K. Beckers, J. Mund, S. Smith-Eckhardt, and M. Glinz for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Eckhardt, J., Vogelsang, A., Méndez Fernández, D. (2016). On the Distinction of Functional and Quality Requirements in Practice. In: Abrahamsson, P., Jedlitschka, A., Nguyen Duc, A., Felderer, M., Amasaki, S., Mikkonen, T. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10027. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49093-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49094-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)