Skip to main content

Applying Social Network Analysis and Centrality Measures to Improve Information Flow Analysis

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNPSE,volume 10027)

Abstract

In software development projects, documents are very important for sharing requirements and other information among employees. However, information can be transported in different ways. Conversations, meetings, workshops and emails convey and impart information as well. Especially large companies struggle in dealing with unclear and incorrect information flows. These information flows can be improved by means of information flow analysis and flow patterns. One technique to analyze information flows is the FLOW method. It supports visualization and analysis of information flows to detect lacks and anomalies and thereby improves information flows. An analyst gathers information transported in the company. Afterwards, information flows are visualized and analyzed based on patterns and personal experience. Nevertheless, analysis based on individual knowledge is error-prone. Hence, we improve the FLOW method with the help of social network analysis applying centrality measures to the FLOW method and to support the FLOW analyst.

Keywords

  • Information Flow Analysis
  • Social Network Analysis
  • Exchange Measurements
  • Applying Centrality Measures
  • Flow Method

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_25
  • Chapter length: 8 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-49094-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Refer to [16] for a detailed description of the FLOW syntax.

  2. 2.

    UCINET is a common used tool for social network analysis.

References

  1. Stapel, K.: Informationsflusstheorie der Softwareentwicklung, 1st edn., Univ, Hannover, Dr. Hut, München (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stapel, K., Knauss, E., Schneider, K.: Using FLOW to improve communication of requirements in globally distributed software projects. In: Workshop on Collaboration and Intercultural Issues on Requirements: Communication, Understanding and Softskills (CIRCUS 2009), pp. 5–14 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Durugbo, C., Tiwari, A., Alcock, J.R.: Modelling information flow for organisations: a review of approaches and future challenges. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 33(3), 597–610 (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Merrill, J., et al.: Findings from an organizational network analysis to support local public health management. J. Urban Health Bull. N.Y. Acad. Med. 85(4), 572–584 (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Borgatti, S.P., Foster, P.C.: The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. J. Manag. 29(6), 991–1013 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Braha, D., Bar-Yam, Y.: Information flow structure in large-scale product development organizational networks. In: Vervest, P., Heck, E., Pau, L.-F., Preiss, K. (eds.) Smart Business Networks, 1st edn., pp. 105–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Friedkin, N.E.: Information flow through strong and weak ties in intraorganizational social networks. Soc. Netw. 3(4), 273–285 (1982)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Ryynänen, H., Jalkala, A., Salminen, R.T.: Supplier’s internal communication network during the project sales process. Proj. Manag. J. 44(3), 5–20 (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Borgatti, S.P.: Centrality and network flow. Soc. Netw. 27(1), 55–71 (2005)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman, L.C., Roeder, D., Mulholland, R.R.: Centrality in social networks: II. Experimental results. Soc. Netw. 2(2), 119–141 (1979)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Borgatti, S.P.: Centrality and AIDS. Connections 18(1), 112–114 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schneider, K., Liskin, O.: Exploring FLOW distance in project communication. In: 2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE), pp. 117–118 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Faust, K.: Centrality in affiliation networks. Soc. Netw. 19(2), 157–191 (1997)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Newman, M.J.: A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Soc. Netw. 27(1), 39–54 (2005)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Stapel, K., Schneider, K., Lübke, D., Flohr, T.: Improving an industrial reference process by information flow analysis: a case study. In: Münch, J., Abrahamsson, P. (eds.) PROFES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4589, pp. 147–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73460-4_15

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research under grant number K3: FKZ 13N13548 (2015-2018) and by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under grant number 263807701 (Project TeamFLOW, 2015-2017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Kiesling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kiesling, S., Klünder, J., Fischer, D., Schneider, K., Fischbach, K. (2016). Applying Social Network Analysis and Centrality Measures to Improve Information Flow Analysis. In: Abrahamsson, P., Jedlitschka, A., Nguyen Duc, A., Felderer, M., Amasaki, S., Mikkonen, T. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10027. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49093-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49094-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)