Abstract
To explore how surveillance is perceived and represented in contemporary literature, the present essay analyses three contemporary novels: whose ethical dimension involves digital technologies and their impact on privacy, human interactions and also literature itself: Dave Eggers’s The Circle (2013), Jonathan Franzen’s Purity (2015) and Gary Shteyngart’s Super Sad True Love Story (2010). These post-postmodern novels, as they might be called, tell the opposite rhetoric of the one that emerged with the digital revolution (the rhetoric of a world improved by the Internet and social media). In these narratives, the Internet and social media help creating a dystopian society ruled by global surveillance. The first part of this chapter shows the interrelation of surveillance societies or surveillance systems with post-human characters and dystopian spaces. The second part explores the authors’ engagement with the same digital technologies criticized in their fictional narratives. It will argue for the need to discuss the ontological presence of the author in the digital world: Eggers’s, Franzen’s, and Shteyngart’s novels, with their strong ethical component, offer a good example of why this authorial presence or voice matters. Without aiming at providing a definitive overview of the connection between surveillance and post-postmodernism, this chapter explores how certain rhetorical resources and ethical issues offer a preliminary basis for future investigations on the literature/digital age nexus.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birke, D., & Christ, B. (2013). Paratext and digitized darrative: Mapping the field. NARRATIVE, 21(1), 65–87.
Booker, M. K. (2005). Dystopian fiction. In D. Herman et al. (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 127–128). London: Routledge.
Boxall, P. (2013). Twenty-first-century fiction: A critical introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Buchholz, S., & Jahn, M. (2005). Space. In D. Herman et al. (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 551–554). London: Routledge.
Dawson, P. (2013). The return of the omniscient narrator: Authorship and authority in twenty-first century fiction. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Eggers, D. (2013). The circle. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Fan, L. (2016). The digital intensification of postmodern poetics. In T. Lanzendörfer (Ed.), The poetics of genre in the contemporary novel (pp. 35–55).
Ferrando, F. (2013). Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms: Differences and relations. Existenz, 8(2), 26–32.
Fitting, P. (2010). Utopia, dystopia, and science fiction. In G. Claeys (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Utopian literature (pp. 135–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foer, J. S. (2013). How not to be alone. The New York Times. Retrieved March 6, 2016, form http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/09/opinion/sunday/how-not-to-be-alone.html?_r=0.
Franzen, J. (2011). Liking is for cowards. Go for what hurts. The New York Times. Retrieved March 6, 2016, from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/opinion/29franzen.html.
Franzen, J. (2013). What’s wrong with the modern world. The guardian. Retrieved September 6, 2013.
Franzen, J. (2015). Purity. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Greenwald, G. (2014). No place to hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Kammerer, D. (2012). Surveillance in literature, film and television. In K. Ball et al. (Eds.), Handbook of surveillance studies (pp. 99–106). London: Routledge.
Lyon, D. (2007). Surveillance, power, and everyday life. In R. Mansell et al. (Eds.), The Oxford hand book of information and communication technologies (pp. 449–472). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Lyon, D. (2015). Surveillance after Snowden. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Mann, S., & Ferenbok, J. (2013). New media and the power politics of Sousveillance in a surveillance-dominated world. Surveillance and Society, 11(1/2), 18–34.
McHale, B. (2015). The Cambridge introduction to postmodernism. New York: Cambridge UP.
McLaughlin, R. (2012). Post-postmodernism. In J. Bray, A. Gibbons, & B. McHale (Eds.), The Routledge companion to experimental literature (pp. 212–223). New York: Routledge.
McSweeney’s. (2013). A brief Q&A with Dave Eggers about his new novel. The Circle. Retrieved March 6, 2016, from http://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/a-brief-q-a-with-dave-eggers-about-his-new-novel-the-circle.
Murakami Wood, D. (2013). What is global surveillance? Towards a relational political economy of the global surveillant assemblage. Geoforum, 49, 317–326.
Nealon, J. (2012). Post-postmodernism: Or, the cultural logic of just-in-time capitalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Orwell, G. ([1949] 1961). Nineteen eighty-four. New York: Signet Classics.
Parker, J. (2016). Conceptions of place, space and narrative: Past, present and future. Amsterdam International Electronic Journal for Cultural Narratology (AJCN), (7 & 8), 74–101 (Autumn 2012/2014).
Phelan, J. (2014). Voice, tone, and the rhetoric of narrative communication. Language and Literature, 23(I), 49–60.
Phelan, J., & Rabinowitz P. (2012). Narrative theory: Core concepts and critical debates. With D. Herman, B. Richardson, & R. Warhol. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Pignagnoli, V. (2016a). Sincerity, sharing and authorial discourses on the fiction/nonfiction distinction: The case of Dave Eggers’s you shall know our velocity. In T. Lanzendörfer (Ed.), The poetics of genre in the contemporary novel (pp. 97–111).
Pignagnoli, V. (2016b). Paratextual interferences: Patterns and reconfigurations for literary narrative in the digital age. Amsterdam International Electronic Journal for Cultural Narratology (AJCN), (7 & 8), 102–119 (Autumn 2012/2014).
Ryan, M. L. (2014). Space. In P. Hühn, Peter et al. (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg University. Retrieved March 6, 2016, from http://www.lhn.unihamburg.de/article/space.
Shen, D. (2013). Implied author, authorial audience, and context: Form and history in Neo-Aristotelian rhetorical theory. Narrative, 21(2), 140–158.
Shteyngart, G. (2010). Super sad true love story. London: Granta.
Stockwell, P. (2005). Science fiction. In D. Herman et al. (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 518–520). London: Routledge.
Tally, Robert T. (2014). Lost in grand central: Dystopia and transgression in Neil Gaiman’s “American gods.” In Grubisic, Baxter, & Lee (Eds.), Blast, corrupt, dimantle, erase: Contemporary North American dystopian literature (pp. 357–371). Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
The Telegraph. (2013). Dave Eggers interview. The Telegraph. Retrieved March 6, 2016, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/authorinterviews/10356543/Dave-Eggers-interview.html.
Timmer, N. (2010). Do you feel it too? The post-postmodern syndrome in American fiction at the turn of the millennium. New York: Rodopi.
van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pignagnoli, V. (2017). Surveillance in Post-Postmodern American Fiction: Dave Eggers’s The Circle, Jonathan Franzen’s Purity and Gary Shteyngart’s Super Sad True Love Story. In: Flynn, S., Mackay, A. (eds) Spaces of Surveillance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49085-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49085-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49084-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49085-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)