Abstract
Knowledge exchange no longer occurs only in private email conversations, but also takes place on (semi-)public social media such as Facebook, LinkedIn or Twitter. These media help people maintaining and extending their social networks. They also expose users to a constant stream of tiny bits of information (e.g., news feeds). In this chapter, we examine how social media users can derive professional informational benefits from their online networks. We integrate sociological literature on social capital, organizational psychological literature on networking and social psychological research on impression formation. Results from a large-scale study on actual informational benefits of social media users show that especially users of business networks derive informational benefits. The role of platform usage, networking behavior and network composition was examined. In the second part, we present empirical work on the deliberate (expert search, who-knows-what) and ambient processes fostering informational benefits.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17–40.
Andrews, K. M., & Delahaye, B. L. (2000). Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: The psychosocial filter. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 797–810.
Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230.
Buder, J. (this volume). A conceptual framework of knowledge exchange.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
DiMicco, J., Millen, D. R., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B., & Muller, M. (2008). Motivations for social networking at work. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 711–720). New York, NY: ACM.
Ellison, N. B., Gibbs, J. L., & Weber, M. S. (2015). The use of enterprise social network sites for knowledge sharing in distributed organizations: The role of organizational affordances. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 103–123.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.
Forret, M. L., & Dougherty, T. W. (2001). Correlates of networking behavior for managerial and professional employees. Group & Organization Management, 26, 283–311.
Fulk, J., & Yuan, Y. C. (2013). Location, motivation, and social capitalization via enterprise social networking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 20–37.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82–111.
Hayes, R. A., Carr, C. T., & Wohn, D. Y. (2016). One click, many meanings: Interpreting paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60, 171–187.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8, 125–147.
Leonardi, P. M. (2014). Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Information Systems Research, 25, 796–816.
Leonardi, P. M. (2015). Ambient awareness and knowledge acquisition: Using social media to learn “who knows what” and “who knows whom”. MIS Quarterly, 39, 747–762.
Leonardi, P. M., & Meyer, S. R. (2015). Social media as social lubricant: How ambient awareness eases knowledge transfer. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 10–34.
Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50, 1477–1490.
Levordashka & Utz (2017). Spontaneous trait inferences on social media. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(1), 93–101.
Levordashka, A., & Utz, S. (2016). Ambient awareness: From random noise to digital closeness in online social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 147–154.
Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 38–55.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240–267.
Sassenberg, K. (this volume). Knowledge exchange as a motivated social process.
Shami, N. S., Ehrlich, K., Gay, G., & Hancock, J. T. (2009). Making sense of strangers’ expertise from signals in digital artifacts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 69–78). New York, NY: ACM.
Steinel, W., Utz, S., & Koning, L. (2010). The good, the bad and the ugly thing to do when sharing information: Revealing, concealing and lying depend on social motivation, distribution and importance of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(2), 85–96.
Thompson, C. (2008, September 5). Brave new world of digital intimacy. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html?_r=0
Tong, S., & Walther, J. B. (2011). Relational maintenance and CMC. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 98–118). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Treem, J., & Leonardi, P. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook, 36, 143–189.
Utz, S. (2010). Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one’s profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 15, 314–335.
Utz, S. (2016). Is LinkedIn making you more successful? The informational benefits derived from public social media. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2685–2702.
Utz, S., & Muscanell, N. (2014). Beruflicher Wissensaustausch auf sozialen Medien. Vortrag auf den 10. Stuttgarter Wissensmanagement-Tagen, Stuttgart.
Utz, S., & Muscanell, N. (2015). Der Einfluss von Profilinformationen und Status Updates auf die Identifizierung von Experten [The influence of profile information and status updates on location of expertise]. In Menschen, Medien, Möglichkeiten [People, media, possibilities] 9. Fachgruppentagung Arbeits-, Organisations- und Wirtschaftspsychologie der DGPs in Mainz, p. 61.
Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S.-Y., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 28–49.
Wickramasinghe, V., & Weliwitigoda, P. (2011). Benefits gained from dimensions of social capital: A study of software developers in Sri Lanka. Information Technology & People, 24, 393–413.
Wingender, L.-M., & Wolff, H.-G. (2015). Führt Networking zu Ressourcenerschöpfung? [Does networking lead to ego depletion?]. In T. Rigotti, V. C. Haun, & C. Dormann (Eds.), Menschen, Medien, Möglichkeiten [People, media, possibilities] 9. Fachgruppentagung Arbeits-, Organisations- und Wirtschaftspsychologie der DGPs in Mainz (p. 134). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1251–1263.
Wolff, H.-G., & Moser, K. (2009). Effects of networking on career success: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 196–206.
Zhao, D., & Rosson, M. B. (2009). How and why people twitter: The role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 243–252). New York, NY: ACM.
Acknowledgements
Parts of the research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement no. 312420.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Utz, S., Levordashka, A. (2017). Knowledge Networks in Social Media. In: Schwan, S., Cress, U. (eds) The Psychology of Digital Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49077-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49077-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49075-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49077-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)