Abstract
One of the oldest questions in group research is “What makes a group more than just a collection of individuals?” This chapter posits that as group members interact, their activities can become socially entrained, constituting the group as an entity beyond the individual members. Capturing social entrainment provides a unique marker on when and how unique properties emerge at the group level. Sequential synchronization analysis is a method for assessing the type and degree of entrainment in groups and teams based on member communication and behavior. It first defines meaningful sequences of actions for each team member and then analyzes how those sequences are synchronized over time. The chapter provides a step-by-step guide on the new approach and an example.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Preparation of this chapter was supported by National Science Foundation grant #BCS 0941268 and Army Research Institute grant W5J9CQ-12-C-0017. The contents of this chapter represent the opinions of the authors and not of these organizations.
References
Abbott, A., & Tsay, A. (2000). Sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in sociology review and prospect. Sociological Methods & Research, 29, 3–33.
Aisenbrey, S., & Fasang, A. E. (2010). New life for old ideas: The “second wave” of sequence analysis bringing the “course” back into the life course. Sociological Methods & Research, 38, 420–462.
Ancona, D. G., & Chong, C. (1996). Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (vol. 18, pp. 251–284). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Ancona, D. G., & Chong, C. L. (1992, August). Timing is everything: Entrainment and performance in organization theory. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1992, No. 1, pp. 166–169). Academy of Management.
Axelrod, R. (1976). Structure of decision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Axelrod, R. (Ed.) (2015). Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis; a method for the study of small groups. Oxford, England: Addison-Wesley Press.
Bales, R. F., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in group problem-solving. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 485–495.
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377–391.
Brzinsky-Fay, C., Kohler, U., & Luniak, M. (2006). Sequence analysis with Stata. Stata Journal, 6, 435–460.
Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823–847.
Cappella, J. N. (1991). The biological origins of automated patterns of human interaction. Communication Theory, 1(1), 4–35.
Cazelles, B., & Stone, L. (2003). Detection of imperfect population synchrony in an uncertain world. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 953–968.
Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234–246.
Cornwell, B. (2015). Social sequence analysis: Methods and applications (vol. 37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davis, J. H. (1969). Group performance. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
DeCarlo, L. T. (1997). On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2, 292–307.
DeChurch, L. A., & Marks, M. A. (2006). Leadership in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 311–329.
Fisher, B. A. (1970). Decision emergence: Phases in group decision-making. Communications Monographs, 37, 53–66.
Gabadinho, A., Ritschard, G., Mueller, N. S., & Studer, M. (2011). Analyzing and visualizing state sequences in R with TraMineR. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(4), 1–37.
Gersick, C. J. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9–41.
Gouhier, T. C., Guichard, F., & Gonzalez, A. (2010). Synchrony and stability of food webs in meta-communities. The American Naturalist, 175, 16–34.
Gouhier, T. C., & Guichard, F. (2014). Synchrony: Quantifying variability in space and time. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 524–533.
Halpin, B. (2014). Three narratives of sequence analysis. In Advances in sequence analysis: Theory, method, applications (pp. 75–103). Springer International Publishing.
Hare, A. P. (1976). Handbook of small group research (2nd ed., ). New York: Free Press.
Hare, A. P. (2010). Theories of group development and categories for interaction analysis. Small Group Research, 41, 106–140.
Harrison, D. A., Mohammed, S., McGrath, J. E., Florey, A. T., & Vanderstoep, S. W. (2003). Time matters in team performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psychology, 56, 633–669.
Herndon, B., & Lewis, K. (2015). Applying sequence methods to the study of team temporal dynamics. Organizational Psychology Review, 5, 318–332.
Hewes, D. E. (1996). Small group communication may not influence decision-making: An amplification of socio-egocentric theory. In R. Y. Hirokawa, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (2nd ed., pp. 179–212). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hollister, M. (2009). Is optimal matching suboptimal? Sociological Methods & Research, 38, 235–264.
Holmes, M. E., & Poole, M. S. (1991). Longitudinal analysis. In B. M. Montgomery, & S. Duck (Eds.), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 286–302). New York: Guilford Press.
Ishak, A. W., & Ballard, D. I. (2012). Time to re-group: A typology and nested phase model for action teams. Small Group Research, 43, 3–29.
Joshi, M. V., Karypis, G., & Kumar, V. (1999, May). A universal formulation of sequential patterns. In Proceedings of the KDD’2001 workshop on Temporal Data Mining.
Koonin, E. V., & Galperin, M. Y. (2003). Principles and methods of sequence analysis. In Sequence—Evolution—Function, Springer US, pp. 111–192.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
Kozlowski, S. W., Chao, G. T., Chang, C. H., & Fernandez, R. (2015). Team dynamics: Using “big data” to advance the science of team effectiveness. In S. Tonidandel, E. King, & J. Cortina (Eds.), Big data at work: The data science revolution and organizational psychology. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kozlowski, S. W., Chao, G. T., Grand, J. A., Braun, M. T., & Kuljanin, G. (2013). Advancing multilevel research design capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 581–615.
Lacoursiere, R. B. (1980). The life cycle of groups. New York: Human Sciences Press.
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Meyers, R. A., Kauffeld, S., Neininger, A., & Henschel, A. (2011). Verbal interaction sequences and group mood exploring the role of team planning communication. Small Group Research, 42, 639–668.
Loreau, M., & de Mazancourt, C. (2008). Species synchrony and its drivers: Neutral and nonneutral community dynamics in fluctuating environments. The American Naturalist, 172, 48–66S.
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376.
McGrath, J. E. (1990). Time matters in groups. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 23–61). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
McGrath, J. E., & Kelly, J. R. (1986). Time and human interaction: Toward a social psychology of time. New York: Guilford Press.
Murase, T., Asencio, R., McDonald, J., Poole M.S., DeChurch, L. A., & Contractor, N. (2015). The effect of synchronization of group processes on multiteam system effectiveness. Presented at the annual meeting of National Communication Association, Las Vegas, NV.
Murase, T., Doty, D., Wax, A. M. Y., DeChurch, L. A., & Contractor, N. S. (2012). Teams are changing: Time to “think networks”. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5, 41–44.
Needleman, S. B., & Wunsch, C. D. (1970). A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 48, 443–453.
Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric therapy. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Pondy, L. R. (1967). Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 296–320.
Poole, M. S. (1981). Decision development in small groups I: A comparison of two models. Communication Monographs, 48(1), 1–24.
Poole, M. S., & Holmes, M. E. (1995). Decision development in computer-assisted group decision making. Human Communication Research, 22, 90–127.
Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1989). Decision development in small groups IV a typology of group decision paths. Human Communication Research, 15, 323–356.
Poole, M. S., Lambert, N. J., Murase, T., Asencio, R., & McDonald, J. (2017). Sequential analysis of processes. In H. Tsoukas, & A. Langley (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational process studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rico, R., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge–based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33, 163–184.
Ritschard, G., Bürgin, R., & Studer, M. (2013). Exploratory mining of life event histories. In J. J. McArdle, & G. Ritschard (Eds.), Contemporary issues in exploratory data mining in the behavioral sciences (pp. 221–253). New York: Routledge.
Roberts, K. H., Hulin, C. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1978). Developing an interdisciplinary science of organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sambamurthy, V., & Poole, M. S. (1992). The effects of variations in capabilities of GDSS designs on management of cognitive conflict in groups. Information Systems Research, 3, 224–251.
Sankoff, D., & Kruskal, J. B. (Eds.) (1983). Time warps, string edits, and macromolecules: The theory and practice of sequence comparison. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Schiflett, S. G., Elliott, L. R., Salas, E., & Coovert, M. D. (Eds.) (2004). Scaled worlds: Development, validation, and applications. Hants: Ashgate.
Stachowski, A. A., Kaplan, S. A., & Waller, M. J. (2009). The benefits of flexible team interaction during crises. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1536–1543.
Stewart, G. L., Fulmer, I. S., & Barrick, M. R. (2005). An exploration of member roles as a multilevel linking mechanism for individual traits and team outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 58, 343–365.
Tschan, F. (1995). Communication enhances small group performance if it conforms to task requirements: The concept of ideal communication cycles. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 371–393.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384–399.
Wu, L. (2000). Some comments on sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in sociology: Review and prospect. Sociological Methods & Research, 29, 41–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murase, T., Poole, M.S., Asencio, R., McDonald, J. (2017). Sequential Synchronization Analysis. In: Pilny, A., Poole, M. (eds) Group Processes. Computational Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48941-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48941-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48940-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48941-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)