Advertisement

Commandment 5

Datafied: Research, Measure and Evaluate
  • Ralph Tench
  • Dejan Verčič
  • Ansgar Zerfass
  • Ángeles Moreno
  • Piet Verhoeven
Chapter

Abstract

In a professional environment research is indispensable. Successful strategies depend on research and so does the evaluation of the success of policies and interventions. Additionally the amount of data and information has grown exponentially in the last decades. Today’s question revolves around what to do with all this data? How do we analyse and interpret this plethora of information? All professions have to deal with these new phenomena of overwhelmingly available data, but for strategic communication and public relations this is even more important since basically we are in the business of information processing. Good fundamental and applied research is getting more and more important for the high-performing communication professionals.

References

  1. AMEC. (2016). Integrated Evaluation Framework. Retrieved from http://www.amecorg.com/amecframework/
  2. Chen, H., Chiang, R. H., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165–1188.Google Scholar
  3. Collister, S. (2015). Algorithmic public relations: Materiality, technology and power in a post‐hegemonic world. In J. L’Etang, D. McKie, N. Snow, & J. Xifra (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Public Relations (pp. 360‐371). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Cutlip, S. M., & Center, A. H. (1952). Effective Public Relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Cutlip, S. M., Center, A. H., & Broom, G. M. (2000). Effective Public Relations (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Daniels, M.(2012). ROI in PR Measurement: Developing a Practical Strategy. Presentation at the First Asia PR Pacific Summit on Measurement. Hong Kong, March 2012. Retrieved from http://amecorg.com/images/public/downloads/apac/Workshop_B.pdf
  7. Davenport, T. (2014). Big Data at Work: Dispelling the Myths, Uncovering the Opportunities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Digital Analytics Association (2013). Social Media Standards Definitions: Reach and Impressions. Retrieved from http://www.smmstandards.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/SMM-Standard-Definitions_DAA_v4.pdf
  9. DPRG, & ICV (2011). Position Paper Communication Controlling – How to Maximize and Demonstrate the Value Creation through Communication. Berlin and Gauting, Germany: DPRG, ICV.Google Scholar
  10. Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grunig, J. E. (2006). Furnishing the edifice: Ongoing research on public relations as a strategic management function. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(2), 151–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing Public Relations. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  13. Kendall, R. (1996). Public Relations Campaign Strategies Planning for Implementation: Longman. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  14. Long, L. W., & Hazelton, V. (1987). Public relations: A theoretical and practical response. Public Relations Review, 13(2), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Macnamara, J. (1992). Evaluation: The Achilles heel of the public relations profession. International Public Relations Review, 15(4), 17–31.Google Scholar
  16. Macnamara, J. (1999). Research in public relations: A review of the use of evaluation and formative research. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 1(2), 107–134.Google Scholar
  17. Macnamara, J. (2002). Research and evaluation. In C. Tymson & P. Lazar (Eds.), The New Australian and New Zealand Public Relations Manual (pp. 100–134). Sydney: Tymson Communications.Google Scholar
  18. Macnamara, J. (2012). Public Relations: Theories, Practices, Critiques. Sydney: Pearson.Google Scholar
  19. Macnamara, J. (2014). The Development of International Standards for Measurement and Evaluation of Public Relations and Corporate Communication: A Review. Report for the Australian Centre for Public Communication. Sydney: University of Technology Sydney.Google Scholar
  20. Macnamara, J. (2015). Breaking the measurement and evaluation deadlock: A new approach and model. Journal of Communication Management, 19(4), 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Markov, A. A. Translated by Jacques J. Schorr-Kon and PST staff (1954). Theory of Algorithms. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR.Google Scholar
  22. Marston, J. E. (1963). The Nature of Public Relations. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K (2013). Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  24. Michaelson, D., & Stacks, D. (2011). Standardization in public relations measurement and evaluation. Public Relations Journal, 5(2), 1–22.Google Scholar
  25. Rossi, P. H., & Freeman, H. E. (1993). Program monitoring for evaluation and management. In P. H. Rossi & H. E. Freeman (Eds.), Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (pp. 163–213). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Shirky, C. (2008). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York, NY: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  27. Taleb, H. M. (2010). Gender and leadership styles in single-sex academic institutions. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(4), 287–302.Google Scholar
  28. TechAmerica Foundation’s Federal Big Data Commission. (2012). Demystifying Big Data: A Practical Guide to Transforming the Business of Government. Retrieved from http://www.techamerica.org/Docs/fileManager.cfm?f=techamerica-bigdatareport-final.pdf
  29. Tufekci, Z. (2014). Engineering the public: Big data, surveillance and computational politics. First Monday, 19(7), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Volk, S. C. (2016). A systematic review of 40 years of public relations evaluation and measurement research: Looking into the past, the present, and the future. Public Relations Review. Doi:  10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Watson, T., & Noble, P. (2014). Evaluating Public Relations: A Best Practice Guide to Public Relations Planning, Research and Evaluation (3rd ed.). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  32. Watson, T., & Zerfass, A. (2011). Return on investment in public relations. A critique of concepts used by practitioners from communication and management sciences perspectives. PRism, 8(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  33. Weiner, M., & Kochhar, S. (2016). Irreversible: The Public Relations Big Data Revolution[IPR Whitepaper]. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.Google Scholar
  34. Wiesenberg, M., Zerfass, A., & Moreno, A. (2017). Big Data and Automation in Strategic Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 11(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wright, D., Gaunt, R., Leggetter, B., Daniels, M., & Zerfass, A. (2009). Global Survey of Communications Measurement 2009 – Final Report. London: AMEC.Google Scholar
  36. Zerfass, A. (2010). Assuring rationality and transparency in corporate communications. Theoretical foundations and empirical findings on communication controlling and communication performance management. In M. D. Dodd & K. Yamamura (Eds.), Ethical Issues for Public Relations Practice in a Multicultural World, 13th International Public Relations Research Conference (pp. 947–966). Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.Google Scholar
  37. Zerfass, A. (2015). Kommunikations-Controlling: Steuerung und Wertschöpfung. In R. Fröhlich, P. Szyszka, & G. Bentele (Eds.), Handbuch der Public Relations (3rd ed., pp. 715–738). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zerfass, A., Tench, R., Verhoeven, P., Verčič, D., & Moreno, A. (2010). European Communication Monitor 2010. Status Quo and Challenges for Public Relations in Europe. Results of an Empirical Survey in 46 Countries. Brussels: EACD, EUPRERA.Google Scholar
  39. Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Verhoeven, P., Moreno, A., & Tench, R. (2012). European Communication Monitor 2012: Challenges and Competencies for Strategic Communication. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA, Helios Media.Google Scholar
  40. Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Verhoeven, P., Moreno, A., & Tench, R. (2015). European Communication Monitor 2015. Creating Communication Value Through Listening, Messaging and Measurement. Results of a Survey in 41 Countries. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA, Helios Media.Google Scholar
  41. Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., & Volk, S. C. (2017). Communication Evaluation and Measurement: Skills, Practices and Utilization in European Organizations. Corporate Communications – An International Journal, 22(1), 2–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zerfass, A., Verhoeven, P., Moreno, A., Tench, R., & Verčič, D. (2016). European Communication Monitor 2016. Exploring Trends in Big Data, Stakeholder Engagement and Strategic Communication. Results Of A Survey In 43 Countries. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA, Quadriga Media Berlin.Google Scholar
  43. Zerfass, A., Verhoeven, P., Tench, R., Moreno, A., & Verčič, D. (2011). European Communication Monitor 2011. Empirical Insights into Strategic Communication in Europe. Results of an Empirical Survey in 43 Countries. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA.Google Scholar
  44. Zerfass, A., & Volk, S. (2018). Aligning and linking communication with organizational goals. Manuscript to be published. In M. J. Canel & V. Luoma-Aho (Eds.), Handbook of Public Sector Communication. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralph Tench
    • 1
  • Dejan Verčič
    • 2
  • Ansgar Zerfass
    • 3
  • Ángeles Moreno
    • 4
  • Piet Verhoeven
    • 5
  1. 1.Leeds Beckett UniversityLeedsUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.University of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  3. 3.University of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  4. 4.Universidad Rey Juan CarlosMadridSpain
  5. 5.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations