Commandment 4

Embedded: Influence Through Communicative Leadership
  • Ralph Tench
  • Dejan Verčič
  • Ansgar Zerfass
  • Ángeles Moreno
  • Piet Verhoeven
Chapter

Abstract

In the previous chapters we have seen how communication helps the organisation to be related to the dynamic of the world. To make this happen communication departments need also to be completely embedded into the organisation they work for. That is the fourth commandment in this book: excellent communication departments are embedded in the organisation they work for and the organisation is effectively embedded in the societal, cultural and social spaces they are part of (see Box 14). A prerequisite for being embedded is effective leadership. Communication professionals have to show leadership to be able to become embedded in the organisation and the organisation has to show leadership to become embedded in its surroundings.

References

  1. Aascher, M. (2016). De rol van de leider. De Gids, (3), 3–7.Google Scholar
  2. Amiguet, L. L. (2016). Interview with Howard Gardner, La Vanguardia, 11 April 2016. Retrieved from www.lavanguardia.com/lacontra/20160411/401021583313/una-mala-persona-no-llega-nunca-a-ser-buen-profesional.html
  3. Berger, B. K. (2005). Power over, power with, and power to relations: Critical reflections on public relations, the dominant coalition, and activism. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(1), 5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, B. K., & Meng, J. (2014). Public Relations Leaders as Sensemakers: A Global Study of Leadership in Public Relations and Communication Management. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Dahlgaard-Park, S., & Dahlgaard, J. J. (2007). Excellence – 25 years evolution. Journal of Management History, 13(4), 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ernest, R. C. (1985). Corporate cultures and effective planning. Personnel Administrator, 30(3), 49–60.Google Scholar
  7. Falkheimer, J. (2014). The power of strategic communication in organizational development. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 6(2/3), 124–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grunig, L. A., Grunig, J. E., & Dozier, D. M. (2002). Excellent Public Relations and Effective Organizations. A Study of Communication Management in Three Countries. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., Van Ruler, B., VerčIč, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007). Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R. E., & Pennings, J. M. (1971). A strategic contingencies’ theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(2), 216–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holtzhausen, D. R., & Voto, R. (2002). Resistance from the margins: The postmodern public relations practitioner as organizational activist. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14(1), 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holtzhausen, D., & Zerfass, A. (2015). Strategic communication: Opportunities and challenges of the research area. In D. R. Holtzhausen & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Strategic Communication (pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Jin, Y. (2010). Emotional leadership as a key dimension of public relations leadership: A national survey of public relations leaders. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22(2), 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meng, J. (2012). Strategic leadership in public relations: An integrated conceptual framework. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 336–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meng, J. (2014). Unpacking the relationship between organizational culture and excellent leadership in public relations: an empirical investigation. Journal of Communication Management, 18(4), 363–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meng, J., & Berger, B. (2013). An integrated model of excellent leadership in public relations: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 25(2), 141–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meng, J., Berger, B. K., Gower, K. K., & Heyman, W. C. (2012). A test of excellent leadership in public relations: Key qualities, valuable sources, and distinctive leadership perceptions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24(1), 18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers, not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  20. Moreno, A., Navarro Ruiz, C., & Humanes, M. L. (2014a). El liderazgo en relaciones públicas y gestión de comunicación. Análisis cuantitativo de los factores de liderazgo en el sector en España. Palabra Clave, 17(3), 946–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moreno, A., Verhoeven, P., Tench, R., & Zerfass, A. (2014b). Increasing power and taking a lead – What are practitioners really doing? Empirical evidence from European communications managers. Revista Internacional de Relaciones Públicas, 4(7), 73–94.Google Scholar
  22. Neill, M. S. (2015). Beyond the c-suite: Corporate communications’ power and influence. Journal of Communication Management, 19(2), 118–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pfeffer, J. (1977). The ambiguity of leadership. Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 104–112.Google Scholar
  24. Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  25. Reber, B. H., & Berger, B. K. (2006). Finding influence: Examining the role of influence in public relations practice. Journal of Communication Management, 10(3), 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, B. G., & Place, K. R. (2013). Integrating power? Evaluating public relations influence in an integrated communication structure. Journal of Public Relations Research, 25(2), 168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smudde, P. M., & Courtright, J. L. (2010). Public relations and power. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations (pp. 177–189). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Thoening, J., & Waldman, C. (2007). The Marking Enterprise. Business Success and Societal Embedding. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Werder, K. P., & Holtzhausen, D. (2009). An analysis of the influence of public relations department leadership style on public relations strategy use and effectiveness. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(4), 404–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zerfass, A. (2008). Corporate communication revisited: Integrating business strategy and strategic communication. In A. Zerfass, B. Van Ruler, & K. Sriramesh (Eds.), Public Relations Research. European and International Perspectives and Innovations (pp. 65–96). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  31. Zerfass, A., Moreno, A., Tench, R., Verčič, D., & Verhoeven, P. (2009). European Communication Monitor 2009. Trends in Communication Management and Public Relations – Results of a Survey in 34 Countries. Brussels: EUPRERA.Google Scholar
  32. Zerfass, A., Verhoeven, P., Tench, R., Moreno, A., & Verčič, D. (2011). European Communication Monitor 2011. Empirical Insights into Strategic Communication in Europe. Results of an Empirical Survey in 43 Countries. Brussels: EACD, EUPRERA.Google Scholar
  33. Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Verhoeven, P., Moreno, A., & Tench, R. (2012). European Communication Monitor 2012: Challenges and Competencies for Strategic Communication. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA, Helios Media.Google Scholar
  34. Zerfass, A., Tench, R., Verčič, D., Verhoeven, P., & Moreno, A. (2014). European Communication Monitor 2014. Excellence in Strategic Communication – Key Issues, Leadership, Gender and Mobile Media. Results of a Survey in 42 Countries. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA, Helios Media.Google Scholar
  35. Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Verhoeven, P., Moreno, A., & Tench, R. (2015). European Communication Monitor 2015. Creating Communication Value Through Listening, Messaging and Measurement. Results of a Survey in 41 Countries. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA, Helios Media.Google Scholar
  36. Zerfass, A., Verhoeven, P., Moreno, A., Tench, R., & Verčič, D. (2016). European Communication Monitor 2016. Exploring Trends in Big Data, Stakeholder Engagement and Strategic Communication. Results of A Survey In 43 Countries. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA, Quadriga Media Berlin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralph Tench
    • 1
  • Dejan Verčič
    • 2
  • Ansgar Zerfass
    • 3
  • Ángeles Moreno
    • 4
  • Piet Verhoeven
    • 5
  1. 1.Leeds Beckett UniversityLeedsUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.University of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  3. 3.University of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  4. 4.Universidad Rey Juan CarlosMadridSpain
  5. 5.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations