Skip to main content

Instigating Start-Up Industries as a Foundation for International High-Growth Venturing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 835 Accesses

Part of the book series: The Academy of International Business ((AIB))

Abstract

The present study approaches international venturing with a deep contextualized view, emphasizing the social setting in which international entrepreneurial behavior is embedded. Relying on a review of research on contextual influences on international entrepreneurship and the concept of high-growth venturing, we develop a conceptualization of a collective activity-based start-up industry for international high-growth venturing. Through an empirical study of the start-up industry in Israel, we explicate the contextual determinants of international venturing in start-up industries. We contribute to the understanding of start-up industries as a particular growth frontier in international business.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acs, Z., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z., Parsons, W., & Tracy, S. (2008). High impact firms: Gazelles revisited (Working Paper No. 328). Washington, DC: SBA Office of Advocacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S., & Evers, N. (2015). International opportunity recognition in international new ventures—A dynamic managerial capabilities perspective. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 13(3), 260–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anokhin, S., & Wincent, J. (2012). Start-up rates and innovation: A cross-country examination. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D., & Thurik, R. A. (2001). Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century: From the managed to the entrepreneurial economy. In D. C. Mueller & U. Cantner (Eds.), Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century (pp. 23–40). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D., & Thurik, R. A. (2010). Unraveling the shift to the entrepreneurial economy (Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 10-080/3). Amsterdam and Rotterdam: Tinbergen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avnimelech, G., Kenney, M., & Teubal, M. (2004). Building venture capital industries: Understanding the US and Israeli experiences (BRIE Working Paper 160). Berkeley, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avnimelech, G., & Teubal, M. (2004). Venture capital start-up co-evolution and the emergence and development of Israel’s new high tech cluster. Part 1: Macro- background and industry analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(1), 33–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avnimelech, G., & Teubal, M. (2006). Creating venture capital industries that co-evolve with high tech: Insights from an extended industry life cycle perspective of the Israeli experience. Research Policy, 35(10), 1477–1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T., Gedajlovic, E., & Lubatkin, M. (2005). A framework for comparing entrepreneurship processes across nations. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(5), 492–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D. (1979). The job generation process. MIT program on neighborhood and regional change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D. (1987). Job creation in America: How our smallest companies put the most people to work. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D., & Medoff, J. (1994). Gazelles. In L. Solmon & A. Levenson (Eds.), Labor markets, employment policy and job creation (pp. 159–167). London: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breznitz, D. (2006). Innovation-based industrial policy in emerging economies? The case of Israel’s IT industry. Business and Politics, 8(3), 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breznitz, D. (2007). Industrial R&D as a national policy: Horizontal technology policies and industry-state co-evolution in the growth of the Israeli software industry. Research Policy, 36(9), 1465–1482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, Y., Styles, C., & Wilkinson, I. F. (2012). An opportunity-based view of rapid internationalization. Journal of International Marketing, 20(1), 74–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, Y., Styles, C., & Wilkinson, I. F. (2015). Opportunity portfolio: Moving beyond single opportunity explanations in international entrepreneurship research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(1), 199–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. (2015). Re-thinking research on born globals. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1), 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N., & Jones, M. (2004). Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 485–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, D., Chaundry, S., & Batstone, S. (2001). An investigation into the overseas expansion of small Asian-owned U.K. firms. Small Business Economics, 16(2), 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J., Johnson, J., & Parboteeah, P. (2014). National rates of opportunity entrepreneurship activity: Insights from institutional anomie theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(4), 775–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana, L.-P. (1995). Entrepreneurship in a remote sub-arctic community. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(1), 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana, L.-P., Hamilton, R., & Wick, K. (2009). Deciding to export: An exploratory study of Singaporean entrepreneurs. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 7(2), 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., Hunter, E., & Klofsten, M. (2006). Institutional forces: The invisible hand that shapes venture ideas? International Small Business Journal, 24(2), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D., Danis, W., & Dakhli, M. (2010). The moderating effect of institutional context on the relationship between associational activity and new business activity in emerging economies. International Business Review, 19(1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gregorio, D., Musteen, M., & Thomas, D. (2008). International new ventures: The cross-border nexus of individuals and opportunities. Journal of World Business, 43(2), 186–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson, G., & Eliasson, Å. (1996). The biotechnological competence bloc. Revue d’Economie Industrielle, 78(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson, G., & Eliasson, Å. (2005). The theory of the firm and the markets for strategic acquisitions. In U. Cantner, E. Dinopoulos, & R. Lanzilotti (Eds.), Entrepreneurships, the new economy and public policy (pp. 91–115). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B. (2012). Startup communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, D. (2004). International entrepreneurship and the small business. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16(4), 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., & Giuliani, A. (2013). A narrative perspective on entrepreneurial opportunities. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 157–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghauri, P. (2004). Designing and conducting case studies in international business research. In R. Marschan-Piekkari & C. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business (pp. 109–124). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenthal, J., Johanson, J., & Johanson, M. (2003). Market discovery and the international expansion of the firm. International Business Review, 12(6), 659–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrekson, M., & Johansson, D. (2010). Gazelles as job creators: A survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 35(2), 227–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. (2009). Boulevard of broken dreams: Why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital have failed—And what to do about it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. (2010). The future of public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital. Small Business Economics, 35(3), 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levie, J., Autio, E., Acs, Z., & Hart, M. (2014). Global entrepreneurship and institutions: An introduction. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 437–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Xiao, W., & Huang, X. (2008). Bounded entrepreneurship and internationalization of indigenous Chinese private-owned firms. International Business Review, 17(4), 488–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainela, T., & Puhakka, V. (2009). Organising new business in turbulent context: Opportunity-creation and effectuation behaviours for IJV in transition markets. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 7(2), 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainela, T., Puhakka, V., & Servais, P. (2014). The concept of international opportunity in international entrepreneurship: A review and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(1), 105–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. (2009). Public policy support for the informal venture capital market in Europe a critical review. International Small Business Journal, 27(5), 536–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth-oriented entrepreneurship. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C., & Harrison, R. (2006). After the exit: Acquisitions, entrepreneurial recycling and regional economic development. Regional Studies, 40(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, P. (1989). International vs. domestic entrepreneurship: New venture strategic behavior and industry structure. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(6), 387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, J., Ward, W., & Nowlin, E. (2006). Location, industrial concentration and the propensity of small US firms to export: Entrepreneurship in the international marketplace. International Marketing Review, 23(5), 486–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzychenko, O. (2008). Cross-cultural entrepreneurial competence in identifying international business opportunities. European Management Journal, 26(6), 366–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasra, R., & Dacin, T. (2010). Institutional arrangements and international entrepreneurship: The state as institutional entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 583–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B., & McDougall, P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senor, D., & Singer, S. (2009). Start-up nation: The story of Israel’s economic miracle. New York: Hachette Book Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sequeira, J., Carr, J., & Rasheed, A. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurship: Determinants of firm type and owner attributions of success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1023–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. (2015). Party on! A call for entrepreneurship research that is more interactive, activity based, cognitively hot, compassionate, and prosocial. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sipola, S., Puhakka, V., & Mainela, T. (2016). A start-up ecosystem as a structure and context for high-growth. In T. M. Devinney, G. Markman, T. Pedersen, & L. Tihanyi (Eds.), Global entrepreneurship: Past, present & future (Advances in International Management, Vol. 29, pp. 179–202). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenholm, P., Acs, Z., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the tate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 176–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, P., & Phillips, N. (2011). Entrepreneurship in emerging markets. Management International Review, 51(1), 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, S., Sarasvathy, S., Dew, N., & Forster, W. (2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade award: Whither the promise? Moving forward with entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J., Kistruck, G., Ireland, D., & Ketchen, D. (2010). The entrepreneurship process in base of the pyramid markets: The case of multinational enterprise/nongovernment organization alliances. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 555–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2011). Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 740–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship–Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennberg, K., & DeTienne, D. (2014). What do we really mean when we talk about ‘exit’? A critical review of research on entrepreneurial exit. International Small Business Journal, 32(1), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., Audretsch, D., & Karlsson, C. (2011). The future of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., Korri, J. S., & Yu, J. F. (2005). Cognition and international entrepreneurship: Implications for research on international opportunity recognition and exploitation. International Business Review, 14(2), 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander, I. (2004). The microfoundations of cluster stickness—Walking in the shoes of the entrepreneur. Journal of International Management, 10(2), 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mainela, T., Puhakka, V., Sipola, S. (2017). Instigating Start-Up Industries as a Foundation for International High-Growth Venturing. In: Ibeh, K., Tolentino, P., Janne, O., Liu, X. (eds) Growth Frontiers in International Business. The Academy of International Business. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48851-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics