The Advanced Network of Things: A Middleware to Provide Enhanced Performance and Functionality in IoT

  • Gabriel Urzaiz
  • Ramon Hervas
  • Jesus Fontecha
  • Jose Bravo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10070)

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) imposes several challenges and opportunities. Most of the existing and ongoing network solutions are limited in scope and technology, ignoring important IoT aspects and using traditional protocols and technologies that are not necessarily suitable for things. The proposal is named the Advanced Network of Things (ANT) which constitutes an alternate solution to provide network enhanced services in IoT. In this paper the ANT model design is presented.

Keywords

Internet of things (IoT) Middleware Enhanced services 

References

  1. 1.
    Chen, Y.-K.: Challenges and opportunities of internet of things. In: 2012 17th Asia and South Pacific, pp. 383–388, 30 January 2012–2 February 2012. doi: 10.1109/ASPDAC.2012.6164978
  2. 2.
    Khan, R., Khan, S.U., Zaheer, R., Khan, S.: Future internet: the internet of things architecture, possible applications and key challenges. In: 2012 10th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT), pp. 257–260, 17–19 December 2012. doi: 10.1109/FIT.2012.53
  3. 3.
    Krco, S., Pokric, B., Carrez, F.: Designing IoT architecture(s): a european perspective. In: 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), pp. 79–84, 6–8 March 2014. doi: 10.1109/WF-IoT.2014.6803124
  4. 4.
    Name Data Networking project overview. http://named-data.net/project/, date consulted October 06, 2015
  5. 5.
    Mobility First Future Internet Architecture project overview. http://mobilityfirst.winlab.rutgers.edu/, date consulted October 06, 2015
  6. 6.
    NEBULA: a trustworthy, secure and evolvable Future Internet Architecture. http://nebula-fia.org/, date consulted October 06, 2015
  7. 7.
    eXpressive Internet Architecture. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~xia/, date consulted October 06, 2015
  8. 8.
    Choicenet: network innovation through choice. https://code.renci.org/gf/project/choicenet/. Date consulted October 06, 2015
  9. 9.
    Li, J., Shvartzshnaider, Y., Francisco, J., Martin, R.P., Nagaraja, K., Raychaudhuri, D.: Delivering internet-of-things services in mobility first future internet architecture. In: 2012 3rd International Conference on the Internet of Things (IOT), pp. 31–38, 24–26 October 2012. doi: 10.1109/IOT.2012.6402301
  10. 10.
    Li, J., Shvartzshnaider, Y., Francisco, J., Martin, R.P., Raychaudhuri, D.: Enabling internet-of-things services in the mobility first future internet architecture. In: 2012 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), pp. 1–6, 25–28 June 2012. doi: 10.1109/WoWMoM.2012.6263787
  11. 11.
    Li, S., Zhang, Y., Raychaudhuri, D., Ravindran, R.: A comparative study of MobilityFirst and NDN based ICN-IoT architectures. In: 2014 10th International Conference on Heterogeneous Networking for Quality, Reliability, Security and Robustness (QShine), pp. 158–163, 18–20 August 2014. doi: 10.1109/QSHINE.2014.6928680
  12. 12.
    Evdokimov, S.; Fabian, B.; Kunz, S.; Schoenemann, N., “Comparison of Discovery Service Architectures for the Internet of Things. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing (SUTC), pp. 237–244, 7–9 June 2010. doi: 10.1109/SUTC.2010.22
  13. 13.
    Lan, L., Li, F., Wang, B., Zhang, L., Shi, R.: An Event-Driven Service-Oriented Architecture for the Internet of Things. In: Services Computing Conference (APSCC), 2014 Asia-Pacific, pp. 68–73, 4–6 December 2014. doi: 10.1109/APSCC.2014.34
  14. 14.
    Sarkar, C., Nambi, A.U.S.N., Prasad, R.V., Rahim, A., Neisse, R., Baldini, G.: DIAT: a scalable distributed architecture for IoT. IEEE Internet Things J. 2(3), 230–239 (2015). doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2014.2387155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Singh, D., Tripathi, G., Jara, A.J.: A survey of internet-of-things: future vision, architecture, challenges and services. In: 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), pp. 287–292, 6–8 March 2014. doi: 10.1109/WF-IoT.2014.6803174
  16. 16.
    Singh, D., Alberti, A.M.: Developing nova genesis architecture for internet of things services: observation, challenges and ITMS application. In: 2014 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), pp. 1009–1014, 22–24 October 2014. doi: 10.1109/ICTC.2014.6983361
  17. 17.
    Duan, R., Chen, X., Xing, T.: A QoS architecture for IOT. In: 2011 International Conference on and 4th International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing Internet of Things (iThings/CPSCom), pp. 717–720, 19–22 October 2011. doi: 10.1109/iThings/CPSCom.2011.125
  18. 18.
    Conzon, D., Bolognesi, T., Brizzi, P., Lotito, A., Tomasi, R., Spirito, M.A.: The VIRTUS middleware: an XMPP based architecture for secure IoT communications. In: 2012 21st International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), pp. 1–6, 30 July 2012–2 August 2012. doi: 10.1109/ICCCN.2012.6289309
  19. 19.
    ITU-T, IoT Global Standards Initiative, IoT reference model. Y.2060). http://www.itu.int/itu-t/recommendations/rec.aspx?rec=Y.2060. Date consulted 07 June 2016
  20. 20.
    P2413 - Standard for an Architectural Framework for the Internet of Things (IoT). IEEE Standards Association. https://standards.ieee.org/develop/project/2413.html. Date consulted 07 June 2016
  21. 21.
    IETF RFC7452: Architectural considerations in Smart Object Networking. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7452. Date consulted 07 June 2016

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriel Urzaiz
    • 1
  • Ramon Hervas
    • 2
  • Jesus Fontecha
    • 2
  • Jose Bravo
    • 2
  1. 1.Universidad Anahuac MayabMeridaMexico
  2. 2.Universidad de Castilla-La ManchaCiudad RealSpain

Personalised recommendations