Abstract
In 2012, two additional questions not in the initial survey sought also to probe differences between junior and senior women. The 2012 written responses from all four cohorts of POWRE awardees overwhelmingly affirm that they believe junior and senior women face different issues from those faced by the senior women colleagues. Most discussed a number of changes in institutional policies and practices that they believe would be most useful for facilitating careers and laboratory climates for junior women. Although they acknowledged that issues differed for junior and senior women, overall, relatively few respondents had ideas about how to improve the situation for senior STEM academic women compared to their junior colleagues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bartlett, T. (2005). More time. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(2), A-16.
Fogg, P. (2005, August 19). Princeton gives automatic tenure extension to new parents. Chronicle of Higher Education Today’s News. http://chronicle.com/temp/email.php?id=unlwfuntjabwyhvh5whlr7usj. Accessed 20 August 2005.
Karukstis, K. K., Gourley, B. L., Rossi, M., Wright, L. L., & Hunter, A. B. (2011). A horizontal mentoring initiative for senior women scientists at liberal arts colleges. In K. K. Karukstis, B. L. Gourley, M. Rossi, & L. L. Wright (Eds.), ACS symposium series (Chapter 10, pp. 141–151). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
Pope, J. (2005, May 17). Harvard to commit $50 M to women’s programs. Boston Globe. www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2005/05/17/html.
Rosser, S. V. (2001). Balancing: Survey of fiscal year 1997, 1998, and 1999 POWRE awardees. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7(1), 1–11.
Rosser, S. V. (2006). Senior women scientists: Overlooked and understudied? Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12(4), 275–293.
Rosser, S., & Daniels, J. Z. (2004). Widening paths to success, improving the environment, and moving toward lessons learned from experiences of POWRE and CBL awardees. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 10(2), 131–148.
Rosser, S. l., & Lane, E.O. (2002). Key barriers for academic institutions seeking to retain women scientists and engineers: Family unvriendly policies, low numbers, stereotypes, and harassment. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(2), 163–191.
Sheridan, J., Brennan, P. F., Carnes, M., & Handelsman, J. (2006). Discovering directions for change in higher education through the experiences of senior women faculty. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 387–396.
Stewart, A., Malley, J., & LaVaque-Manty, D. (2007). Transforming science and engineering: Advancing academic women. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Wilson, R. (2006). Just half of professors earn tenure in 7 years, Penn state study finds. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(46), A-10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosser, S.V. (2017). Senior Compared to Junior Women Academic Scientists: Similar or Different Needs?. In: Academic Women in STEM Faculty. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48793-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48793-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48792-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48793-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)