Skip to main content

The Deconstruction of Stereotypes: Homosexuals and Military Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Storied Nature of Human Life

Abstract

Four years ago, Captain Kenneth Karols and I submitted to the Department of Defense a draft report in which we recommended that research be undertaken, the results of which might facilitate the integration of gay men and lesbians into the armed forces. The recommendation followed from a historical and social psychological analysis, and also from the expectation that continuing pressures from civil rights advocates would influence the president, the Congress, or the Courts to rescind the discriminatory policy. On the basis of our conclusions that stereotypes, rather than empirically confirmed facts, provided the support for the resistance to changing the exclusionary policy, the recommended research would have focused on ways and means of deconstructing stereotypes (Sarbin & Karols, 1988). Our recommendation fell on deaf ears.

Prepared for the symposium Integrating Lesbians and Gay Men into the Military: 101st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, August 23, 1993, Toronto, Canada. Discussions with Ralph Carney, Peter Lenrow, Mark Eithelberg, and John Kitsuse helped me in the formulation of the argument.

The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and are not be construed as representing the position or policy of any government agency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Research Psychologist, Defense Personnel Security Research Center, Monterey, CA.

  2. 2.

    “Stereotype” as used in this paper carries the connotation of negative judgments of a class of people, often in the absence of any direct experience with members of the class. I am aware that the literature on the subject shows that stereotypes can be made up of positive attributions as well. Elsewhere I have made the claim that “social type” would serve a better descriptor for the purpose of this essay, and I am following the current common usage: “Stereotype” refers to a set of beliefs and attitudes, predominantly negative, a subset of the general category “social type.” It would be cumbersome to substitute “negatively valued social types” for “stereotypes.”

  3. 3.

    Not all politicians avoid “sin” in phrasing their arguments. In discussions about expert testimony given to the House Armed Services Committee in May 1993, Rep. Robert Dornan (D-California) said, “all of the psychologists and psychiatrists in the world aren’t ever going to convince me that heterosexual sex (outside marriage) is not a sin, and I’m not going to cut a different standard” for homosexual sex (Monitor, American Psychological Association, July, 1993).

References

  • Allport, G. (1937). Personality. New York: Henry Holt and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, V. (1976). Sexual variance in society and history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. (1978). Interpersonal and attitude outcomes in cooperating interracial groups. Journal of Research in Development and Education, 12, 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. (1974). Further thoughts on the processes of compliance, identification, and internalization. In J. Tedeschi & T. (Eds.), Perspectives on social power (pp. 125–121). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, S. A. (1988). Homosexuality and the social meaning of gender. Wisconsin Law Review, 88, 187–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1986). The intergroup contact hypothesis reconsidered. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 169–195). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T. R. (1968a). On the distinction between social roles and social types, with special reference to the hippie. American Journal of Psychiatry, 125, 1024–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T. R. (1968b). Ontology recapitulates philology: The mythic nature of anxiety. American Psychologist, 23, 411–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T. R., & Karols, K. (1988). Nonconforming sexual orientations and military suitability. Monterey, CA: Defense Personnel Security Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T. R., & Kitsuse, J. I. (Eds.). (1994). Constructing the social. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. E. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgement-involvement approach. Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., & Miene, P. (1994). On the functions of stereotypes and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 33–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scheibe, K.E., Barrett, F.J. (2017). The Deconstruction of Stereotypes: Homosexuals and Military Policy. In: The Storied Nature of Human Life. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48790-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics