REWAS 2013 pp 332-340 | Cite as

Resource Efficient Metal and Material Recycling

  • Markus A. Reuter
  • Antoinette van Schaik

Abstract

Metals enable sustainability through their use and their recyclability. However, various factors can affect the Resource Efficiency of Metal Processing and Recycling. Some typical factors that enable Resource Efficiency include and arranged under the drivers of sustainability: Environment (Maximize Resource Efficiency — Energy, Recyclates, Materials, Water, Sludges, Emissions, Land); Economic Feasibility (BAT & Recycling Systems Simulation / Digitalization, Product vis-à-vis Material Centric Recycling); and Social — Licence to Operate (Legislation, consumer, policy, theft, manual labour.). In order to realize this primary production has to be linked systemically with typical actors in the recycling chain such as Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), Recyclers & Collection, Physical separation specialists as well as process metallurgical operations that produce high value metals, compounds and products that recycle back to products. This is best done with deep knowledge of multi-physics, technology, product & system design, process control, market, life cycle management, policy, to name a few. The combination of these will be discussed as Design for Sustainability (DfS) and Design for Recycling (DfR) applications.

Keywords

Design for Recycling Design for Sustainability Resource Efficiency 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    UNEP, 2013. Metal Recycling — Opportunities, Limits, Infrastructure. Reuter, M., Hudson, C., Hagelüken, C., Heiskanen, K., Meskers, C., Van Schaik, A., et al. In preparation.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van Schaik, A., Reuter, M.A., 2012. Shredding, sorting and recovery of metals from WEEE: linking design to resource efficiency, In: Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) handbook (Edited by V Goodship, University of Warwick, UK and A Stevels, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands), 163–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reuter, M.A., Van Schaik, A., 2012. Opportunities and Limits of WEEE Recycling — Recommendations to Product Design from a Recyclers Perspective. In: Proceedings of Electronics Goes Green 2012+, 9–12 September 2012, Berlin, Germany, 10p.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reuter, M.A., Heiskanen, K, Boin, U., Van Schaik, A., Verhoef, E., Yang, Y., 2005. The Metrics of Material and Metal Ecology, Harmonizing the resource, technology and environmental cycles Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, 706p. (ISBN: 13 978–0-444–51137-9).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reuter, M.A., Van Schaik, A., 2012. Opportunities and limits of recycling: A dynamic-model-based analysis, MRS BULLETIN, Vol. 37(4), 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Schaik, A., Reuter, M.A., 2010. Dynamic modelling of E-waste recycling system performance based on product design. Minerals Engineering, 23, 192–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Recyclable Printed Circuit Boards. National Physical Laboratory (NPL), UK. 2012. http://www.npl.co.uk/news/recyclable-printed-circuit-boards (25 October 2012).

Copyright information

© TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus A. Reuter
    • 1
  • Antoinette van Schaik
    • 2
  1. 1.Outotec OyjEspooFinland
  2. 2.MARASThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations