Advertisement

REWAS 2013 pp 240-260 | Cite as

Assessing a Reclaimed Concrete Up-Cycling Scheme through Life-Cycle Analysis

  • Sylvain Guignot
  • Kathy Bru
  • Solène Touzé
  • Yannick Ménard

Abstract

The present study evaluates the environmental impacts of a recycling scheme for gravels from building concretes wastes, in which the liberated aggregates are reused in structural concretes while the residual mortar fines are sent to the raw mill of a clinker kiln.

The evaluation follows a life-cycle analysis approach performed according to the ISO standard 14040, and whose scope encompasses the production of clinker through a dry kiln technology, the mining processes of the raw materials needed in the kiln, the extraction of round and crushed natural aggregates, and the crushing of concrete wastes using usual jaw crushers or pulsed-power electrical fragmentation. Insofar as possible, the inventory data are collected at the national scale of France and are recovered from the supplier of the fragmentation device, from local quarries and from an estimated mean-technology of clinker production. The choice of the impact assessment indicators is restricted to midpoints according to a problem-oriented methodology, and primarily focuses on a potential reduction in the natural resources depletion and in the CO2 emissions. The study specifically addresses the influence of (i) the amount of recovered cement paste added to the kiln raw mill, and (ii) the distance of transportation modalities of concrete wastes to the crushing processes and of the recycled aggregates to construction sites. The results establish links between significant environmental gains and the various distances of transportations that intervene in the alternative processing of concrete wastes. These links will be probed more deeply in a future work.

Concrete aggregate electro-fragmentation recycling life-cycle analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Chisholm, “Best practice guide for the use of RA in new concretes” (CCANZ technical report TR14, ISSN 1171–4204, 2011).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Marinkovic et al., “Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete,” Waste Management, 30 (2010), 2255–2264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T.C. Hansen and H. Narud, “Strength of recycled concrete made from crushed concrete coarse aggregate,” Concrete International, 5 (1983), 79–83.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C.S. Poon et al., “Influence of moisture states of natural and recycled aggregates on the slump and compressive strength of concrete,” Cem. Concrete Research, 34 (2004), 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Bauchard, “Utilisation en technique routière de granulats provenant du concassage de béton de démolition,” Bull. liaison Labo P. et Ch., 134 (1984), 53–57.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Dosho, “Development of a sustainable concrete waste recycling system — application of recycled aggregate concrete produced by aggregate replacing method,” J. Advanced Concrete Tech., 5 (1) (2007), 27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Portland Cement Association, “Recycled aggregates for reinforced concrete?” Concrete Technology Today, 23(2) (2002).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Corinaldesi and G. Moriconi, “Influence of mineral additions on the performance of 100 % recycled aggregate concrete,” Con. Build. Mat., 23 (2009), 2869–2876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Kikuchi, T. Mukai, and H. Koizumi, Demolition and reuse of concrete and masonry: reuse of demolition waste (London: Chapman and Hall, 1988), 595–604.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Abe, “Study on production of recycled aggregate by gravity concentration method,” (1997). JCA Proceedings of Cement and Concrete, 51, (1997), 482–487.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y. Sakasume et al., “Development for production technique on high quality recyclable aggregate. Part 4. Method of screw grinding” (Paper presented at the Annual Meeting Architectural Institute of Japan, 2002), A-1, 1027–1028.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. Kuroda and H. Hashida, “A closed-loop concrete on a construction site” (Paper presented at the International symposium on sustainable development of cement, concrete and concrete structures, Toronto, Canada, 2005), 667–683.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Etxeberria et al., “Influence of amount of recycled coarse aggregate and production process on properties of recycled aggregate concrete,” Cem. Concr. Res., 37 (2007), 735–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Tsujino et al., “Application of conventionally recycled coarse aggregate to concrete structure by surface modification treatment,” J. Advanced Concrete Tech., 5 (2007), 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.S. Damtofts et al., “Sustainable development and climate change initiatives,” Cem Concr Res., 38 (2008), 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clamens (2012) http://www.groupeclamens.org/recyclage-beton les_tarifs_du_recyclage. html? qs= tarif.
  17. 17.
    S. Maeda et al., “Research on concrete aggregate collection technology by pulsed power discharge” (Paper presented at the 34th Conference on Our World in Concrete & Structures, Singapore, 2009 August 16th–18th).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Braunschweig, S. Kytzia and S. Bischof, “Recycled concrete: environmentally beneficial over virgin concrete?” (Paper presented at LCM 2011–Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Management, Berlin, 2011).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y. Ishikawa, “Issues in LCA in the concrete industry,” JLCA Newsletter, 7 (2009), 13–16.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    SETAC, Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: a code of practice (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Press, Pensacola, FL, 1993).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    N. Lippiat and F. Bourgeois, “Investigation of microwave-assisted concrete recycling using single-particle testing,” Min. Eng., 21 (2012), 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 14040. Environmental Management (1997). Life Cycle Assessment. Part I. Principles and Framework, Geneva, CH.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Tillman, T. Ekvall, H. Baumann, “Choice of system boundaries in life cycle assessment,” J. Clean. Prod., 2 (1994), 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    H. Udo de Haes et al., Life-cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice (Pensacola, FL: SETAC Books, 2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    D.N. Huntziger and T.D. Eatmon, “A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies,” J. Clean Prod., 17 (2009), 668–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J.W. Owens, “Life — Cycle Assessment — Constraints on moving from Inventory to Impact Assessment,” J. Ind. Ecol., 1 (1997), 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Goedkoop et al., “ReCiPe 2008–a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonized category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. First edition”, (http://www.leidenuniv.nl/cml/ssp/publications/recipe_characterisation.pdf).
  28. 28.
    C. Chen et al., “Environmental impact of cement production: detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation,” J. Clean Prod., 18 (2010), 478–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    S. Solomon et al., Climate change 2007. The physical science basics. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    B. Von Bahr et al., “Experiences of environmental performance evaluation in the cement industry. Data quality of environmental performance indicators as a limiting factor for benchmarking and rating,” J. Clean Prod., 11 (2003), 713–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    S. Guignot et al., “Development of an innovative technique for demolition concrete up-cycling: a response to mitigate GHG’s emissions and natural resources depletion” (Paper presented at the XXVI International Mineral Processing Congress — IMPC 2012, New Delhi, India, 2012).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    C.W. Moore, “Chemical control of Portland cement clinker,” Am. Ceram. Bull., 61 (1982), 511–515.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    R.H. Bogue, “Calculation of the compounds in Portland cement,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 1(4) (1929), 192–197.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    H.F.W. Taylor, Cement chemistry (ICE Publishing, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    G. Baudet, “Production de CO2 dans l’élaboration des ciments Portland. Bilans et possibilités de réduction des émissions” (Report 410, BRGM/French Geological Survey, 2004).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    S.B. Marinkovic and I.S. Ignjatovic, Innovative materials and techniques in concrete construction (ACES Workshop). Chapter 7. Recycled Aggregate Concrete for structural use. An overview of Technologies, Properties and Applications (Michael N. Fardis Editor, Springer Science, 2010).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    P. Van den Heede and N. De Belie, “Environmental impact and life cycle assessment (LCA) of traditional and ‘green’ concretes: Literature review and theoretical calculations,” Cement Concrete Comp., 34 (2012), 431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    T. Martaud, “Evaluation environnementale de la production de granulats naturels en exploitation de carrières” (PhD Thesis, Orleans University, 2008).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    U.M. Mroueh et al., Life cycle assessment of road construction (Finnra Reports 17/2000, Finnish National Road Administration, 1999).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Aggregate Industries, (Sustainability report, 2009). From: http://www.aggregate.com/sustainability/. Accessed 11/05/12.
  41. 41.
    S. Sayagh, “Approche multicritères de l’utilisation de matériaux alternatifs dans les chaussées” (Ph.D Thesis, ENPC, 2007).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    INSEE — Service de Statistiques Nationales d’Entreprises (French National Statistics Office). La protection de l’environnement. Le transport des matériaux de construction. Accessed 11/05/12.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    G. Habert et al., “Development of a depletion indicator for natural resources used in concrete,” Resources, conservation and recycling, 54 (2010), 364–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    ATILH — Association Technique des Industries des Liants Hydrauliques (2002). Module d’informations environnementales des ciments. From: http://www.infociments.fr/developpement-durable/construction-durable/icv-ciments
  45. 45.
    UNICEM “Etudes d’impact environnemental. Plus de complexité,” Unicem Magazine, 760 (2012).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    P. Lebret, “Inventaire des carrières d’approvisionnement des cimenteries en France métropolitaine” (Report BRGM/RP-56986-FR, BRGM/French Geological Survey, 2009).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Eurostat (2011). Electricity production and supply statistics. From: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Electricity_production_and_suppl y_statistics. Accessed on 11/05/12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylvain Guignot
    • 1
  • Kathy Bru
    • 1
  • Solène Touzé
    • 1
  • Yannick Ménard
    • 1
  1. 1.BRGMOrléansFrance

Personalised recommendations