Three-Dimensional Investigation of Void Growth Leading to Fracture in Commercially Pure Titanium

  • Marina Pushkareva
  • Jérôme Adrien
  • Eric Maire
  • Arnaud Weck
Conference paper


The fracture process of commercially pure titanium was visualized in model materials containing artificial holes. These model materials were fabricated using a femtosecond laser coupled with a diffusion bonding technique to obtain voids in the interior of titanium samples. Changes in voids dimensions during in-situ straining were recorded in three dimensions using x-ray computed tomography. Void growth obtained experimentally was compared with analytical model. The model predicted well void growth. Behavior between voids was justified in terms of grain orientation. Depending on the number of grains between voids and the grains orientation, two types of fracture behaviors were observed: i) brittle fracture when grains were in a hard orientation and when few grains were present between voids; ii) ductile fracture when grains were in a soft orientation and when several grains were present between voids.


Void growth, X-ray tomography, In-situ tensile test Fracture 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M.H. Yoo, “Slip, Twinning, and Fracture in Hexagonal Close-Packed Metals,“ Metallurgical Transactions A, 12A (1981), 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.H. Buckley, “Influence of crystal orientation on friction characteristics of titanium single crystals in vacuum” (NASA technical note, National aeronautics and administration, 1965).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Salishchev et al., “Changes in misorientations of grain boundaries in titanium during deformation,“ Materials Characterization, 61 (7) (2010), 732–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V.V. Stolyarov et al., “Grain refinement and properties of pure Ti processed by warm ECAP and cold rolling,” Materials Science and Engineering, A343 (2003), 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N.P. Gurao and S. Suwas, “Evolution of crystallographic texture during deformation of submicron grain size titanium” Journal of Materials Research, 26 (4) (2011), 523–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.J. Fundenbergert et al., ”Modelling and prediction of mechanical properties for materials with hexagonal symmetry (zinc, titanium and zirconium alloys),” ActaMaterialia, 45 (10) (1997), 4041–4055.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.A. Salem, S.R.Kalidindi, and S.L.Semiatin, “Strain hardening due to deformation twinning in α-titanium: Constitutive relations and crystal-plasticity modeling,” ActaMaterialia, 53 (2005), 3495–3502.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    X. Wu et al., ”Prediction of crystallographic texture evolution and anisotropic stress-strain curves during large plastic strains in high purity α-titanium using a Taylor-type crystal plasticity model,” ActaMaterialia, 55 (2) (2007), 423–432.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Proust, C.N. Tome and G.C.Kaschner, “Modeling texture, twinning and hardening evolution during deformation of hexagonal materials,” ActaMaterialia, 55 (6) (2007), 2137–2148.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Krishna Mohan Rao, V.V. KutumbaRao, E. Rama Rao, “Influence of microstructure on void nucleation and growth in a near-α titanium alloy IMI 685,” Materials Science and Engineering A, 110 (1989) 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.N. Tome, R.A. Lebensohn, U.F. Kocks, “A model for texture development dominated by deformation twinning: Application to zirconium alloys,” ActaMetallurgica, 39 (11) (1991), 2667–2680.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.A. Lebensohn and C.N. Tome, “A self-consistent anisotropic approach for the simulation of plastic deformation and texture development of polycrystals: Application to zirconium alloys,” ActaMaterialia, 41 (9) (1993), 2611–2624.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G.C. Kaschner et al., “Mechanical response of zirconium—II.Experimental and finite element analysis of bent beams,” ActaMaterialia, 49 (15) 2001, 3097–3108.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Bhattacharya and M. Niewczas, “Work-hardening behaviour of Mg single crystals oriented for basal slip,” Philosophical Magazine, 91 (17) (2011), 2227–2247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown D.W. et al., “Internal strain and texture evolution during deformation twinning in magnesium,” Materials Science and Engineering A, 399 (1–2) (2005) 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Jain et al., “Grain size effects on the tensile properties and deformation mechanisms of a magnesium alloy, AZ31B, sheet,” Materials Science and Engineering A, 486 (2008), 545–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G.P. Potirniche et al., “Lattice orientation eff ects on void growth and coalescence in fcc single crystals,” International Journal of Plasticity 22 (2006), 921–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. Roters et al., “Overview of constitutive laws, kinematics, homogenization and multiscale methods in crystal plasticity finite-element modeling: Theory, experiments, applications,” ActaMaterialia, 58 (2010), 1152–1211.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Rice and D. Tracey, “On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields,” Journal of the M echanics and Physics of Solids, 17 (3) (1969), 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    P.F. Thomason, Ductile Fracture of Metals (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Weck et al., “Visualization by x-ray tomography of void growth and coalescence leading to fracture in model materials”, ActaMaterialia, 56 (12) (2008), 2919–2928.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    W.S.Rasband, ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA,, 1997–2011.
  23. 23.
    Bridgman P.W., Studies in Large Plastic Flow and Fracture, New York,McGraw-Hill: 1952.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marina Pushkareva
    • 1
  • Jérôme Adrien
    • 2
  • Eric Maire
    • 2
  • Arnaud Weck
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OttawaCanada
  2. 2.INSA de LyonFrance

Personalised recommendations