Advertisement

Appendix A: Review of Empirical NeuroIS Literature

  • René Riedl
  • Fred D. Davis
  • Rajiv D. Banker
  • Peter H. Kenning
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 21)

Abstract

To identify empirical NeuroIS papers published in peer-reviewed journals, we searched for articles via WEB OF KNOWLEDGESM (June 30, 2015). Specifically, we searched for “NeuroIS” based on the constraint <TOPIC>.

References

  1. Astor, P. J., Adam, M. T. P., Jerčić, P., Schaaff, K., & Weinhardt, C. (2013). Integrating biosignals into information systems: A NeuroIS tool for improving emotion regulation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 247–278.Google Scholar
  2. Dimoka, A. (2010). What does the brain tell us about trust and distrust? Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 373–396.Google Scholar
  3. Dimoka, A. (2012). How to conduct a functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) study in social science research. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 811–840.Google Scholar
  4. Dimoka, A., Pavlou, P. A., & Davis, F. D. (2007). NEURO-IS: the potential of cognitive neuroscience for information systems research. ICIS 2007.Google Scholar
  5. Dimoka, A., Pavlou, P. A., & Davis, F. D. (2011). NeuroIS: the potential of cognitive neuroscience for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 22(4), December, 687–702.Google Scholar
  6. Dimoka, A. et al. (2012). On the use of neurophysiological tools in IS research: Developing a research agenda for NeuroIS. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 679–702.Google Scholar
  7. Gregor, S., Lin, A. C. H., Gedeon, T., Riaz, A., & Zhu, D. (2014). Neuroscience and a nomological network for the understanding and assessment of emotions in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(4), 13–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kuan, K. K. Y., Zhong, Y., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2014). Informational and normative social influence in group-buying: Evidence from self-reported and EEG data. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(4), 151–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Léger, P.-M., Sénecal, S., Courtemanche, F., Ortiz de Guinea, A., Titah, R., Fredette, M., et al. (2014). Precision is in the eye of the beholder: Application of eye fixation-related potentials to information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(10) (Article 3).Google Scholar
  10. Li, M., Jiang, Q., Tan, C.-H., & Wei, K.-K. (2014). Enhancing user-game engagement through software gaming elements. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(4), 115–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liapis, C., & Chatterjee, S. (2011). On a NeuroIS design science model. In H. Jain, A. P. Sinha, & P. Vitharana (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology. DESRIST, LNCS 6629, 440–451.Google Scholar
  12. Loos, P. et al. (2010). NeuroIS: neuroscientific approaches in the investigation and development of information systems. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2(6), December, pp. 395–401. Google Scholar
  13. Minas, R. K., Potter, R. F., Dennis, A. R., Bartelt, V., & Bae, S. (2014). Putting on the thinking cap: Using NeuroIS to understand information processing biases in virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(4), 49–82.Google Scholar
  14. Nunamaker, J. F., Derrick, D. C., Elkins, A. C., Burgoon, J. K., & Patton, M. W. (2011). Embodied conversational agent-based kiosk for automated interviewing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(1), 17–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ortiz de Guinea, A., & Webster, J. (2013). An investigation of information systems use patterns: Technological events as triggers, the effects of time, and consequences for performance. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 1165–1188.Google Scholar
  16. Ortiz de Guinea, A., Titah, R., & Leger, P. M. (2014). Explicit and implicit antecedents of users’ behavioral beliefs in information systems: A neuropsychological investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(4), 179–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Riedl, R., Hubert, M., & Kenning, P. (2010). Are there neural gender differences in online trust? An fMRI study on the perceived trustworthiness of eBay offers. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 397–428.Google Scholar
  18. Riedl, R., Kindermann, H., Auinger, A., & Javor, A. (2012). Technostress from a neurobiological perspective: System breakdown increases the stress hormone cortisol in computer users. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 4(2), 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Riedl, R., Mohr, P. N. C., Kenning, P. H., Davis, F. D., & Heekeren, H. R. (2014). Trusting humans and avatars: A brain imaging study based on evolution theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(4), 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tams, S., Hill, K., Ortiz de Guinea, A., Thatcher, J., & Grover, V. (2014). NeuroIS—Alternative or complement to existing methods? Illustrating the holistic effects of neuroscience and self-reported data in the context of technostress research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(10) (Article 1).Google Scholar
  21. Vance, A., Anderson, B. B., Kirwan, C. B., & Eargle, D. (2014). Using measures of risk perception to predict information security behavior: Insights from electroencephalography (EEG). Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(10) (Article 2). Google Scholar
  22. vom Brocke, J., & Liang, T.-P. (2014). Guidelines for neuroscience studies in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(4), 211–234 (Spring).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • René Riedl
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fred D. Davis
    • 3
  • Rajiv D. Banker
    • 4
  • Peter H. Kenning
    • 5
  1. 1.University of Applied Sciences Upper AustriaSteyrAustria
  2. 2.Johannes Kepler University LinzLinzAustria
  3. 3.Information SystemsTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  4. 4.Fox School of Business and ManagementTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  5. 5.University of DuesseldorfDüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations