Conclusion

  • René Riedl
  • Fred D. Davis
  • Rajiv D. Banker
  • Peter H. Kenning
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 21)

Abstract

The field of NeuroIS has made advancements during the recent past.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank all scholars from the IS and neuroscience disciplines, as well as six anonymous reviewers, for their work in providing guidance on ways to improve the paper. Also, we thank Deborah C. Nester for proof-reading.

References

  1. Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005, March). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(1), 9–64.Google Scholar
  2. Dimoka, A. (2012). How to conduct a functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) study in social science research. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 811–840.Google Scholar
  3. Dimoka, A., Banker, R. D., Benbasat, I., Davis, F. D., Dennis, A. R., Gefen, D., et al. (2012). On the use of neurophysiological tools in IS research: Developing a research agenda for NeuroIS. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 679–702.Google Scholar
  4. Dimoka, A., Pavlou, P. A., & Davis, F. D. (2007). NEURO-IS: The potential of cognitive neuroscience for information systems research. In ICIS 2007.Google Scholar
  5. Dimoka, A., Pavlou, P. A., & Davis, F. D. (2011, December). NeuroIS: The potential of cognitive neuroscience for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 22(4), 687–702.Google Scholar
  6. Hubert, M., Linzmajer, M., Riedl, R., Kenning, P., & Weber, B. (2017). The use of psycho-physiological interaction analysis with fMRI-data in IS research: A guideline. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, forthcoming 2017.Google Scholar
  7. Loos, P., Riedl, R., Müller-Putz, G. R., vom Brocke, J., Davis, F. D., Banker, R., et al. (2010, December) “NeuroIS: Neuroscientific approaches in the investigation and development of information systems. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 2(6), 395–401.Google Scholar
  8. Müller-Putz, G. R.; Riedl, R., & Wriessnegger, S. C. (2015). Electroencephalography (EEG) as a research tool in the information systems discipline: Foundations, measurement, and applications. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, 911–948.Google Scholar
  9. Riedl, R. (2009). Zum Erkenntnispotenzial der kognitiven Neurowissenschaften für die Wirtschaftsinformatik: Überlegungen anhand exemplarischer Anwendungen. NeuroPsychoEconomics (4), 32–44.Google Scholar
  10. Riedl, R., Banker, R. D., Benbasat, I., Davis, F. D., Dennis, A. R., Dimoka, A., et al. (2010). On the foundations of NeuroIS: Reflections on the Gmunden Retreat 2009. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27(15), 243–264.Google Scholar
  11. Riedl, R., Davis, F. D., & Hevner, A. R. (2014). Towards a NeuroIS research methodology: Intensifying the discussion on methods, tools, and measurement. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(10) (Article 4).Google Scholar
  12. vom Brocke, J., & Liang, T. P. (2014). Guidelines for neuroscience studies in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(4), 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wolfschmidt, G. (2004). Die Eroberung des Himmels. In R. Van Dülmen & S. Rauschenbach (Eds.), Macht des Wissens: Die Entstehung der modernen Wissensgesellschaft (pp. 187–212). Wien: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • René Riedl
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fred D. Davis
    • 3
  • Rajiv D. Banker
    • 4
  • Peter H. Kenning
    • 5
  1. 1.University of Applied Sciences Upper AustriaSteyrAustria
  2. 2.Johannes Kepler University LinzLinzAustria
  3. 3.Information SystemsTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  4. 4.Fox School of Business and ManagementTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  5. 5.University of DuesseldorfDüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations