Advertisement

Advancing Different Ideas

  • Richard MeissnerEmail author
Chapter
  • 163 Downloads

Abstract

There is no doubt that research paradigms and (social) theories influence practices, not only in the public sector but also the private sector. To get to the root of the problems facing society and the ways and means we utilise water resources, we need to investigate reality through a different set of paradigmatic lenses and theoretical perspectives. It is through these different ways of investigating reality that we will be able to advance different and innovative ideas, now and into the future. I reached this conclusion after more than two decades of learning about and researching various water governance and politics aspects linked to International Relations as an academic discipline.

Keywords

Constant critique Critical solidarity Beacon PULSE3 Research journey 

References

  1. Agnew C, Anderson E (1992) Water resources in the arid realm. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvesson M, Spicer A (eds) (2011) Metaphors we lead by: understanding leadership in the real world. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson C (1978) The logic of public problems: evaluation in comparative policy research. In: Ashford D (ed) Comparing public policies. Sage, Beverley HillsGoogle Scholar
  4. Aragón-Correa JA, García-Morales VJ, Cordón-Pozo E (2007) Leadership and the organizational learning’s role on innovation and performance: lessons from Spain. Ind Mark Manage 36:349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Archer C (1992) International organizations, 2nd edn. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkinson A (1991) Principles of political ecology. Bellhaven Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Bak P (1996) How nature works: the science of self-organised criticality. Copernicus, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bak P, Paczuski M (1995) Complexity, contingency, and criticality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92(15):6689–6696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ball AR (1988) Modern politics and government. Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baradat LP (2000) Political ideologies: their origins and impact, 8th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  11. Bavinck M, Kooiman J (2008). Slippery as fish–How variations in capture fisheries affect opportunities for governance. Paper presented at the American Fisheries Society Congress, Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  12. Beck U, Ritter M (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  13. Beck U (2007). World risk society and the changing foundations of transnational politics. In: Grande E, Pauly LW (eds) Complex sovereignty. Reconstituting political authority in the Twenty-First century. University of Toronto Press, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  14. Bello DC, Lohtia R, Sangtani V (2004) An institutional analysis of supply chain innovations in global marketing channels. Ind Mark Manage 33(1):57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berejikian J, Dryzek JS (2000) Reflexive action in international politics. Br J Polit Sci 30(2):193–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Berry JM (1997) The interest group society. Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Beschorner N (1992/1993) Water and instability in the Middle East. Adelphi Paper 273, International Institute for Strategic Studies, London, pp 41–42Google Scholar
  18. Björkman M (1987) Time and risk in the cognitive space. In: Sjöberg L (ed) Risk and society: studies of risk generation and reactions to risk. Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Blaikie P, Brookfield H (1987) Land degradation and society. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Bousquet A, Curtis S (2011) Beyond models and metaphors: complexity theory, systems thinking and international relations. Camb Rev Intl Aff 24(1):43–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brown C (1997) Understanding international relations. Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brown ME, Lynn-Jones SM, Miller SE (eds) (1996) Debating the democratic peace: An international security reader. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Brown C (2002) Sovereignty, rights and justice: International political theory today. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Bryant R, Bailey S (1997) Third World political ecology. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Bull H (1977). The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Butler J (1988) Performative acts and gender constitution: an essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal 40(4):519–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Byrne D (1998) Complexity theory and the social sciences: An introduction. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Calder BJ (1977) An attribution theory of leadership. In: Staw BM, Salanick GR (eds) New directions in organizational behaviour. St Clair, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  29. Carr EH (1939). The twenty years’ crisis: An introduction to the study of International Relations. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Carrasco G (1991) Democracy’s interest in groups: Interest group corporatism and democratic theory. Master’s thesis. Simon Fraser University, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  31. Cilliers P (2000) What can we learn from a theory of complexity? Emergence 2(1):23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cilliers P (2001) Boundaries, hierarchies and networks in complex systems. Int J Innov Manag 5(2):135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Comeliau C (2002) The impasse of modernity: debating the future of the global market economy. Translated by P. Camilier. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Cummings MC, Wise D (1971) Democracy under pressure: an introduction to the American political system. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Dahl RA (1963). A preface to democratic theory. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  36. Davies SM (1996) Environmental politics and the changing context of interest group organization. Soc Sci J 33(4):343–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dent EB, Higgins ME, Wharff DM (2005) Spirituality and leadership: an empirical review of definitions, distinctions, and embedded assumptions. The Leadership Quarterly 16:625–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Doyle MW (1986). Liberalism and world politics. Am Polit Sci Rev 80(4):1151–1169Google Scholar
  39. Dougherty JE, Pfalzgraff RL (1990) Contending theories of international relations: a comprehensive survey, 3rd edn. Harper and Row Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Du Plessis A (2000) Charting the course of the water discourse through the fog of international relations theory. In Solomon H, Turton A (eds) Water wars: enduring myth or impending reality. Durban: The African Centre for the constructive resolution of disputesGoogle Scholar
  41. Dunne T (1997) Realism. In: Baylis J, Smith S (eds) The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Easton D (1985) Political science in the United States: Past and present. Int Polit Sci Rev 6(1):133–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Eckersley R (1992) Environmentalism and political theory: Toward an ecocentric approach. University College of London Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Falkenmark M (1986) Fresh water as a factor in strategic policy and action. In: Westing AH (ed) Global resources and international conflict: environmental factors in strategic planning and action. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Falkenmark M (1990) Global water issues confronting humanity. J Peace Res 27(2):177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Finnemore M, Sikkink K, (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization 52(4):887–917Google Scholar
  47. Finnemore M, Sikkink K (2001). Taking stock: The constructivist research program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Ann Rev Polit Sci 4:391–416Google Scholar
  48. Forsyth T (2003) Critical political ecology: the politics of environmental science. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Geldenhuys D (1984) The diplomacy of isolation: South African foreign policy making. St Martin’s Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Geldenhuys D (1990) Isolated states: a comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. Geldenhuys D (1998) Foreign political engagement: remaking states in the post-cold war world. Macmillan, HoundmillsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Geldenhuys D (2004) Deviant conduct in world politics. Palgrave Macmillan, HoundmillsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gibbs PE (2010) Horizon: Before the big bang. Sci GOD J 1(7):510–513Google Scholar
  54. Giddens A (1990) The consequences of modernity. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  55. Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  56. Giddens A (1994) Living in a post-traditional society. In: Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S (eds) Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics. Blackwell Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  57. Gilbert A (1992) Must global politics constrain democracy? Realism, regimes and democratic internationalism. Political Theory 20(1):8–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gilpin RG (1981) War and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Gilpin RG (1984) The richness of the tradition of political realism. Int Org 38(2):285–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Gilpin RG (1987) The political economy of international relations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Gleick PH (1993a) Water in the 21st century. In: Gleick PH (ed) Water in crisis: a guide to the world’s freshwater resources. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  62. Gleick PH (1993b) Water and conflict: fresh water resources and international security. Int Secur 18(1):79–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hague R, Harrop M, Breslin S (1998) Comparative government and politics: an introduction. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. Hall PA (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25(3):275–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Haralambos M, Holborn M (2000) Sociology: themes and perspectives. Harper-Collins Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Hartsock N (1983) Feminist standpoint: developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In: Harding S, Hintikka M (eds) Discovering reality: feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology and philosophy of science. Reidel, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  67. Hayward T (1998) Political theory and ecological values. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  68. Heywood A (1997) Politics. Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Heywood A (1999) Political theory: an introduction, 2nd edn. St Martin’s Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hobson JM (1997) The wealth of states: a comparative sociology of international economic and political change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  71. Hobson JM (2000) The state and international relations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hobson JM (2001) The ‘second state debate’ in international relations: theory turned upside-down. Review of International Studies 27(3):395–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Hobson JM (2002) The two waves of Weberian historical sociology in international relations. In: Hobden S, Hobson JM (eds) Historical sociology of international relations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  74. Hobson JM, Ramesh M (2002) Globalisation makes of states what states make of it: between agency and structure in the state/globalization debate. New Political Econ 7(1):5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Hobson JM, Seabrooke L (2007) Everyday IPE: revealing everyday forms of change in the world economy. In: Hobson JM, Seabrooke L (eds) Everyday politics of the world economy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  76. Hoffmann S (1987). Liberalism and international affairs. In: Hoffmann J, Hoffmann M (eds) Essays in the theory and practice of international politics. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  77. Hoffmann MJ (2003) Constructing a complex world: the frontiers of international relations theory and foreign policy-making. Asian J Political Sci 11(2):37–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Holling CS (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  79. Hopf T (2000) The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. In: Linklater A (ed) International relations: critical concepts in political science, vol IV. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  80. Huggins R, Turner J (1997) The politics of influence and control. In: Axford B, Browning GK, Huggins R, Rosamund B (eds) Politics: an introduction. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  81. Huntington SP (1993) The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs 72(3):22–49Google Scholar
  82. Hymans JEC (2010) The arrival of psychological constructivism. International Theory 2(3):461–467Google Scholar
  83. Jackson R, Sørensen G (2003) Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  84. Jacobs IM (2009) Norms and transboundary co-operation in Africa: the cases of the Orange-Senqu and Nile Rivers. PhD Dissertation, School of International Relations. University of St Andrews, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  85. Jentoft S (2007) Limits of governability: institutional implications for fisheries and coastal governance. Marine Policy 31:360–370Google Scholar
  86. Jentoft S, Chuenpagdee R (2009) Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Marine Policy 33:553–560Google Scholar
  87. Kaku M (2014) M-theory: the mother of all superstrings. New York. Accessed at: http://mkaku.org/home/articles/m-theory-the-mother-of-all-superstrings/. Accessed on 23 May 2014
  88. Katzenstein PJ (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  89. Karsten H (2003) Constructing interdependencies with collaborative information technology. Comput Support Coop Work 12:437–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Kegley CW, Wittkopf ER (1997) World politics: trends and transformation, 6th edn. St Martin’s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  91. Keohane RO (1983) Theory of world politics: structural realism and beyond. In Finifter AW (ed) Political science: the state of the discipline. American Political Science Association, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  92. Kingsford RT, Biggs HC, Pollard SR (2011) Strategic adaptive management in freshwater protected areas and their rivers. Biol Conserv 144:1194–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Kissinger HA (1977) American foreign policy. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  94. Klotz A (1995) Norms reconstituting interests: Global racial equality and U.S. sanction against South Africa. Int Org 49(3):451–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Koh K (2013) Theory-to-research-to-theory strategy: a research-based expansion of radical change theory. Libr Inf Sci Res 35:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Kolars J (1986) The hydro-imperative of Turkey’s search for energy. Middle East J 40(1):53–67Google Scholar
  97. Kooiman J (2003) Governing as governance. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  98. Kooiman J (2008) Exploring the concept of governability. J Comp Policy Anal 10(2):171–190Google Scholar
  99. Kooiman J, Bavinck M (2005) The governance perspective. In: Kooiman J, Bavinck M, Jentoft S, Pullin R (eds) Fish for life: interactive governance for fisheries. Amsterdam University Press, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Kooiman J, Bavinck M (2013) Theorizing governability—the interactive governance perspective. In: Bavinck M, Chuenpagdee R, Jentoft S, Kooiman J (eds) Governability of fisheries and aquaculture: theory and applications. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  101. Krasner S (1976) State power and the structure of international trade. World Politics 28(3):317–47Google Scholar
  102. Le Billon P (2001) The political ecology of war: natural resources and armed conflicts. Political Geogr 20:561–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Le Marquand DG (1977) International rivers: the politics of cooperation. Westwater Research Centre, University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  104. Le Roux R (1989) International law principles in respect of the utilization of common water resources: the Lesotho Highlands Water Project. MA Thesis in International Law, University of Stellenbosch, StellenboschGoogle Scholar
  105. Lebow RN (1994) The long peace, the end of the Cold War, and the failure of realism. Int Org 48(2):249–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Lebow RN (2008) A cultural theory of international relations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Lee KN (1993) Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  108. Lowi MR (1993) Water and power: the politics of a scarce resource in the Jordan River basin. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Lynn-Jones SM (1999) Realism and security studies. In: Snyder CA (ed) Contemporary security and strategy, 2nd edn. Macmillan, HoundmillsGoogle Scholar
  110. Mansbach RW, Vasquez JA (1981) In search of theory: a new paradigm for global politics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  111. Martin-Carasco F, Garrote L, Iglesias A, Medeiro L (2013) Diagnosing causes of water scarcity in complex water resources systems and identifying risk management actions. Water Resour Manag 27:1693–1705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Mastanduno M, Lake DA, Ikenberry GJ (1989) Toward a realist theory of state action. Int Stud Quart 33(4):457–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Matthew RA, Zacher, MW (1995) Liberal international theory: Common threads, divergent strands. In: Kegley CW (ed) Controversies in International Relations theory: Realism and the neo-liberal challenge. St Martin’s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  114. McCaffrey SC (1993) Water, politics, and international law. In: Gleick PH (ed) Water in crisis: a guide to the world’s freshwater resources. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  115. Meissner R (1998a) Water as ‘n bron van politieke konflik en samewerking: ‘n Vergelykende studie van die Midde-Ooste en Suider-Afrika. Rand Afrikaans University, JohannesburgGoogle Scholar
  116. Meissner R (1998b) Piping water from the Okavango River to Namibia—the role of communities and pressure groups in water politics. Global Dialogue 3(2):1998Google Scholar
  117. Meissner R (2004) The transnational role and involvement of interest groups in water politics: a comparative analysis of selected Southern Africa case studies. D.Phil. Dissertation: University of Pretoria, Faculty of HumanitiesGoogle Scholar
  118. Meissner R (2005) Interest groups and the proposed Epupa Dam: towards a theory of water politics. Politeia 24(3):354–369Google Scholar
  119. Meissner R, Jacobs I (2016) Theorising complex water governance in Africa: the case of the proposed Epupa Dam on the Kunene River. Intl Environ Agreem: Politics Law Econ 14(2):21–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Meissner R, Turton AR (2003) The hydrosocial contract theory and the Lesotho Highlands Water Project. Water Policy 5(2):115–126Google Scholar
  121. Millett K (1970) Sexual politics. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  122. Mitchell J (1974) Psychoanalysis and feminism: Freud, Reich, Laing, and women. Pantheon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  123. Moore JA, Roberts M (1992) The pursuit of happiness: government and politics in America. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  124. Moravcsik A (1997) Taking preferences seriously: a liberal theory of international politics. Int Org 51(4):513–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Morgenthau HJ (1978) Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace, 5th edn. Alfred Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  126. Morgenthau HJ (1948) Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. 3rd Edition. Alfred Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  127. Mumme SP (1985) State influence in foreign policy making: water environmental disputes along the United States-Mexico border. West Political Q 38(4):620–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Naess A (1973) The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: a summary. Inquiry 16:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Naff T, Matson RC (1984) Water in the Middle East: conflict of cooperation?. Westview Replica, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
  130. Nel P (1999) Theories of international relations. In: Nel P, McGowan PJ (eds) Power, wealth and global order: an international relations textbook for Africa. University of Cape Town Press, Rondebosch, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  131. Nooteboom S (2007) Impact assessment procedures for sustainable development: a complexity theory perspective. Environ Impact Assess Rev 27:645–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Nye JS (2004) Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  133. Nye JS (2010) Joseph Nye on global power shifts. TED Global 2010. Accessed at: http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/joseph_nye_on_global_power_shifts.html. Accessed on 9 Nov 2010
  134. Oneal JR, Russett BM (1997) The classical liberals were right: democracy, interdependence, and conflict, 1950–1985. Int Stud Q 41:267–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Onuf N (1998) Constructivism: a user’s manual. In: Kubálková V, Onuf N, Kowert P (eds) International relations in a constructed world. Armonk, M.E. SharpeGoogle Scholar
  136. Pahl-Wostl C (2007a) The implications of complexity for integrated resources management. Environ Model Softw 22:561–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Pahl-Wostl C (2007b) Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour Manag 21:49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Paterson M (1996) Green politics. In: Burchill S, Linklater A (eds) Theories of international relations. St Martin’s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  139. Pauly LW, Grande E (2007) Reconstituting political authority: sovereignty, effectiveness, and legitimacy in a transnational order. In: Grande E, Pauly LW (eds) Complex sovereignty: reconstituting political authority in the twenty-first century. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  140. Pepper D (1984) The roots of modern environmentalism. Croom Helm, BeckenhamGoogle Scholar
  141. Pettman JJ (1999) Gender issues. In: Burchill S, Devetak R, Linklater A, Paterson M, Reus-Smit C, True J (eds) Theories of international relations, 2nd edn. Palgrave, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  142. Pollard S, Cousins T (2008) Community-based governance of freshwater resources in Southern Africa. WRC Report No. TT328/08. Water Research Commission, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  143. Pollard S, Du Toit D (2008) Integrated water resource management in complex systems: how the catchment management strategies seek to achieve sustainability and equity in water resources in South Africa. Water SA 34(6):671–679Google Scholar
  144. Price R (1998) Reversing the gun sights: transnational civil society targets land mines. Int Org 52(3):613–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Price R, Reus-Smit C (1998) Dangerous liaisons? Critical international relations theory and constructivism. Eur J Int Relat 4:259–294.Google Scholar
  146. Ramo JC (2009) The age of the unthinkable: why the new world disorder constantly surprises us and what to do about it. Little Brown, LondonGoogle Scholar
  147. Rangan H, Kull CA (2009) What makes ecology ‘political’?: rethinking ‘scale’ in political ecology. Prog Hum Geogr 33(1):28–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Ray JL (1998). Does democracy cause peace? Ann Rev Polit Sci 1:27–46.Google Scholar
  149. Reus-Smit C (2001) Constructivism. In: Burchill S, Devetak R, Linklater A, Paterson M, Reus-Smit C, True J (eds) Theories of international relations, 2nd edn. Palgrave, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  150. Ritzer G (2000) Sociological theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  151. Roberts N (1991) Geopolitics and the Euphrates’ water resources. Geography 76:157–159Google Scholar
  152. Rogers K, Biggs, HC (1999) Integrating indicators, endpoints and value systems in strategic management of the Kruger National Park. Freshwater Biology 41:439–451Google Scholar
  153. Rogers K, Roux D, Biggs H (2000) Challenges for catchment management agencies: lessons from bureaucracies, business and resource management. Water SA 26(4):505–511Google Scholar
  154. Rosenau JN (1980) The study of global interdependence: essays on the transnationalisation of world affairs. Nicols, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  155. Rosenau JN (1990) Turbulence in world politics. a theory of change and continuity. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  156. Rosenau JN (1996) Many damn things simultaneously: complexity theory and world politics. Paper presented at the conference on complexity, global politics and national security, November 13, 1996, Washington, D.C. Accessed at: http://www.dodccrp.org/html4/bibliography/comch04.html. Accessed on 20 Oct 2010
  157. Rosenau JN (1997) Along the domestic-foreign frontier: exploring governance in a turbulent world. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Rosenau JN (2003a) The theoretical imperative: unavoidable explication. Asian J Political Sci 11(2):7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Rosenau JN (2003b) Distant proximities: dynamics beyond globalization. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  160. Rosenau JN (2006) The study of world politics: theoretical and methodological challenges. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  161. Roux D, Murray K, Van Wyk E (2009) Enabling effective learning in catchment management agencies: a philosophy and strategy. WRC Report No. TT 421/09. Water Research Commission, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  162. Ruggie JG (1998) What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social construction challenge. International Organization 52(4):855–887Google Scholar
  163. Russett B (1990) Controlling the sword: The democratic governance of national security. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  164. Sacks P (1980) Review Article. State structure and the asymmetrical society: an approach to public policy in Britain. Comp Politics 12(3):349–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Sadie Y (1998) Political parties and interest groups. In: Venter AJ (ed) Government and politics in the new South Africa. Pretoria, J.L. Van SchaikGoogle Scholar
  166. Schmitter PC (1983) Democratic theory and neocorporatist practice. Social research, 50(4):885–928Google Scholar
  167. Schoeman M (1997) Celebrating Westphalia’s 350th birthday: reflections on the state of the state in southern Africa. South Afr J Intl Aff 5(2):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Schoeman M (2002) From SADCC to SADC and beyond: the politics of economic integration. In: Congress of the international economic history organisation, Buenos Aires, July 2002Google Scholar
  169. Schoeman M (2007) China in Africa: the rise of hegemony? Strateg Rev South Afr 29(2):74–97Google Scholar
  170. Schoeman M (2011) Of BRICs and mortar: the growing relations between Africa and the global south. Intl Spect 46(1):33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Scholtens J, Bavinck M (2013) South Indian trawl fisheries—assessing their governability. In: Bavinck M, Chuenpagdee R, Jentoft S, Kooiman J (eds) Governability of fisheries and aquaculture: theory and applications. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  172. Selin E (1987) Collective risks and the environment. In: Sjöberg L (ed) Risk and society: studies of risk generation and reactions to risk. Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  173. Sellars C (1997) The organisation and behaviour of interest groups: a theoretical review and application to South Africa. South African Network of Economic Research, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  174. Shermer M (1997). The crooked timber of history. Complexity 2(6):23–29Google Scholar
  175. Smith MJ (1993) Pressure, power and policy: state autonomy and policy networks in Britain and the United States. Harvester Wheatsheaf, HertfordshireGoogle Scholar
  176. Smith S (1996) Positivism and beyond. In: Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M (eds) International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Soroos MS (1986) Beyond sovereignty: the challenge of global policy. University of South Carolina Press, ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  178. Stankey GH, Clark RN, Bormann BT (2005) Adaptive management of natural resources: theory, concepts, and management institutions. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-654. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Services, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  179. Starr JR (1991) Water wars. Foreign Policy 82:17–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Stern G (2000) The structure of international society: an introduction to the study of international relations. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  181. Stone A (1994) What is a supranational constitution? An essay in international relations theory. Rev Politics 56(3):441–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Streeck W, Kenworthy L (2004) Theories and practices of neo-corporatism. In: Janoski T, Alford R, Hicks A, Schwartz MA (eds) A handbook of political sociology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  183. Thomas C, Howlett D (1993) The freshwater issue in international relations. In: Thomas C, Howlett D (eds) Resource politics: freshwater and regional relations. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  184. Toke D (2000) Green politics and neo-liberalism. Macmillan and St Martin’s Press, Houndmills and New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Turton A, Meissner R (2002) The hydrosocial contract and its manifestation in society: a South African case study. In Turton AR, Henwood R (eds) Hydropolitics in the developing world: a southern african perspective. African Water Issues Research Unit (AWIRU), PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  186. Turton AR, Ohlsson L (1999) Water scarcity and social adaptive capacity: towards an understanding of the social dynamics of managing water scarcity in developing countries. In: Paper presented in the workshop No. 4: water and social stability of the 9th Stockholm water symposium “Urban stability through integrated water-related management”, hosted on 9–12 August by the Stockholm Water Institute (SIWI) in Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  187. Vesilind PJ (1993) The Middle East’s water: critical resource. Nl Geogr 183(55):38–71Google Scholar
  188. Viotti PR, Kauppi MV (1999) International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, and beyond. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  189. Visser F (1989) Recent developments in the joint management of international non-maritime water resources in Africa. Comp Intl Law J South Afr 22(1):59–92Google Scholar
  190. Vorster MP (1987–1988) The Lesotho highlands water project. Suid-Afrikaanse Jaarboek vir Volkereg, 13Google Scholar
  191. Waltz KN (1959) Man, the state and war: A theoretical analysis. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  192. Warner J (2000) Integrated management requires an integrated society: Towards a new hydrosocial contract for the 21st Century. The African Water Issues Research Unit (AWIRU), Occasional Paper, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  193. Weaver W (1948) Science and complexity. American Scientist 36(4):536Google Scholar
  194. Wendt A (1992) Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization 46(2):391–425Google Scholar
  195. Wendt A (1999) Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. Wilson FL (1983) French interest group politics: pluralist or neocorporatist. Am Political Sci Rev 77(4):895–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. Wilson GK (1990) Interest groups. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)PretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Centre for Water Resources ResearchUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalScottsvilleSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations