Advertisement

Active Substantiation: A Theory of Water Research

  • Richard MeissnerEmail author
Chapter
  • 152 Downloads

Abstract

The three case studies presented in Chap. 2 show a strong bias towards positivism. Cognitive processes constitute a bias towards this particular research paradigm. I explore reasons for this inclination and recommend a theory of water research called active substantiation. Active substantiation can be a strong enforcer of expected research outcomes and conclusions. Not only does it relate to research, it can also link with anecdotal and empirical evidence. The brain is like an active loom with countless patterns and threads running back and forth to produce cognition. I follow the discussion of the ‘active loom’ with the search of water on Mars bringing into focus the linkage between water and life. A case study wherein I explore the linkage between water and disaster, and the loss of life, follows this case study. Air France Flight 447 disaster is the subject of this undertaking. ‘Water is life’ is a myth that gets reinforced through active substantiation holding implications for how we perceive reality in the water sector.

Keywords

Active substantiation Active loom Cognition Mars Water is life Air France flight 447 Conformity 

References

  1. Baron J (1991) Beliefs about thinking. In: Voss JN Perkins DN and Segal JW (eds) Informal reasoning and education. Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  2. Blomberg O (2011) Conceptions of cognition for cognitive engineering. Int J Aviat Psychol 21(1):85–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses (BEA) (2012) Final report on the accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 registered F-GZCP operated by Air France, flight AF 447 Rio de Janeiro—. Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Centre for Development Enterprise (CDE) (2010) Water: a looming crisis?. Centre for Development Enterprise, JohannesburgGoogle Scholar
  5. Cilliers P (2000) What can we learn from a theory of complexity? Emergence 2(1):23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cilliers P (2001) Boundaries, hierarchies and networks in complex systems. Int J Innov Manage 5(2):135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Emory University Health Sciences Center (EUHSC) (2006) Emory study lights up the political brain. ScienceDaily, 31 January 2006. Accessed at: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/01/060131092225.htm. Accessed 17 April 2014
  8. Goldin JG (2010) The Universe. Mars: The new evidence. New York: A&E Television Network  Google Scholar
  9. Hornby AS (2005) Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary of current english. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Jägerskog A (2003) Why states cooperate over shared water: the water negotiations in the Jordan River basin. Department of Water and Environmental Studies, Linköping University, LinköpingGoogle Scholar
  11. Khalid I, Bagum I (2013) Hydro politics in Pakistan: perception and misperceptions. South Asian Stud 28(1):7–23Google Scholar
  12. Koriat A, Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B (1980) Reasons for confidence. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem 6:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marks MJ, Fraley RC (2006) Confirmation bias and the sexual double standard. Sex Roles 54(1/2):19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McIlwain H (1984) Neurochemistry and Sherrington’s enchanted loom. J R Soc Med 77:417–425Google Scholar
  15. Meissner R, Jacobs I (2016) Theorising complex water governance in Africa: the case of the proposed Epupa Dam on the Kunene River. Int Environ Agreements: Polit Law Econom 14(2):21–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Myers FWH (1887) Multiplex personality. Proc Soc Psychical Res 4:496–514Google Scholar
  17. Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2(2):175–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Connor P, Preston J (2012) Air crash investigations—Air France 447: vanished. Cineflix, Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  19. Pyszczynski T, Greenberg J (1987) Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: a biased hypothesis-testing model. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 20:297–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rosenau JN (2006) The study of world politics: theoretical and methodological challenges. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Roth D, Warner J, Winnubst M (2006) Een noodverband tegen hoog water: Waterkennis, beleid en politiek rond noodoverloopgebieden. Wageningen University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  22. Scott K (2010) Crash of flight 447. Darlow Smithson Productions, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Sherrington CS (1942) Man on his nature. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Skov RB, Sherman SJ (1986) Information-gathering processes: diagnosticity, hypothesis-confirmatory strategies, and perceived hypothesis confirmation. J Exp Soc Psychol 22:93–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Spegele RD (2014) Emancipatory international relations: critical thinking in international relations. Routledge, Abingdon and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Westen D, Blagov PS, Harenski K, Klits C, Hamann S (2006) Neural bases of motivated reasoning: an fMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U.S. presidential election. J Cogn Neurosci 18(11):1947–1958CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)PretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Centre for Water Resources ResearchUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalScottsvilleSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations