Advertisement

Water Governance and Management and Climate Change

  • Richard MeissnerEmail author
Chapter
  • 190 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter, I will present three case studies; two of which focus on water governance and management and one on climate change. Research scientists argue that climate change has a profound impact on water resources and the management thereof, hence the inclusion of climate change assessment and adaptation strategies as case studies. I analyse two climate change adaptation strategies; one from Australia and the other from South Africa. The other case study deals with South Africa’s National Water Resource Management Strategy and the United Nations Development Programme’s Water and Ocean Governance focus area. How the strategies or plans were developed, using different research paradigms and theories, is the gist of the chapter.

Keywords

Climate change Local government Provincial government Water governance Water management National Water Resource Management Strategy United Nations Development Programme 

References

  1. Adams I (1993) Political ideology today. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Change 15(2):77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler E (1997) Seizing the middle ground: constructivism in world politics. Eur J Int Relat 3(3):19–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen JA (2001) The Middle East water question: hydropolitics and the global economy. I.B. Tauris, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Alvesson M, Spicer A (eds) (2011) Metaphors we lead by: understanding leadership in the real world. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Ascher W, Hirschfelder-Ascher B (2004) Linking Lasswell’s political psychology and the policy sciences. Policy Sci 37(1):23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashley RK (1984) The poverty of neorealism. Int Org 38(2):225–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashton PJ (2007) Riverine biodiversity conservation in South Africa: current situation and future prospects. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 17(5):441–445Google Scholar
  9. Beder S (2001) Equity or efficiency. Engineers Australia, May 2001, p 39Google Scholar
  10. Berke PR (2002) Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? challenges for the twenty-first century. J Plann Lit 17(1):21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Björkman M (1987) Time and risk in the cognitive space. In: Sjöberg L (ed) Risk and society: studies of risk generation and reactions to risk. Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Bonjour L (1999) A priori. In: Audi R (ed) The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Calder BJ (1977) An attribution theory of leadership. In: Staw BM, Salanick GR (eds) New directions in organizational behaviour. St Clair, Chicago Google Scholar
  14. Carranza ME (2014) Rising Regional Powers and International Relations Theories: Comparing Brazil and India’s Foreign Security Policies and Their Search for Great‐Power Status. Foreign Policy Analysis: 1–23Google Scholar
  15. Chandler D (2013) Promoting democratic norms? social constructivism and the ‘subjective’ limits of liberalism. Democratization 20(2):215–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Choy DL, Baum S, Serrao-Neumann S, Crick F, Sanò M, Harman B (2010) Climate change vulnerability in South East Queensland: a spatial and sectoral assessment. Griffith University, SouthportGoogle Scholar
  17. Claassen M (2013) Integrated water resource management in South Africa. Int J Water Gov 1:323–338Google Scholar
  18. Cloete F, Meyer IH (2006) Policy agenda setting. In: Cloete F, Wissink H, de Coning C (eds) Improving public policy from theory to practice. Van Schaik Publishers, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  19. Cloete F, Wissink H, de Coning C (2006) Preface to the second edition. In: Cloete F, Wissink H, de Coning C (eds) Improving public policy from theory to practice, 2nd edn. Van Schaik Publishers, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  20. Coicaud JM (2014) Emotions and passions in the discipline of international relations. Jpn J Polit Sci 15(3):485–513Google Scholar
  21. Cox RW, Sinclair TJ (1996) Approaches to world order. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Department of Water Affairs (DWA) (2013) National water resource strategy, June 2013, 2nd edn. Department of Water Affairs, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  23. Doulton H, Brown K (2009) Ten years to prevent catastrophe? discourses of climate change and international development in the UK press. Glob Environ Change 19:191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Du Plessis A (2000) Charting the course of the water discourse through the fog of international relations theory. In: Solomon H, Turton A (eds) Water wars: enduring myth or impending reality. The African Centre for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes, DurbanGoogle Scholar
  25. Earle A, Jägerskog A, Öjendal J (2010) Introduction: setting the scene for transboundary water management approaches. In: Earle A, Jägerskog A, Öjendal J (eds) Transboundary water management: principles and practice. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Easton D (1985) Political science in the United States: past and present. Int Polit Sci Rev 6(1):133–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eberhard R, Robinson CJ, Waterhouse J, Parslow J, Hart B, Grayson R, Taylor B (2009) Adaptive management for water quality management—from theory to practice. Mar Freshw Res 60:1189–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ebi K (2011) Climate change and health risks: assessing and responding to them through adaptive management. Health Aff 30(5):924–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Finnemore M (1996) Constructing norms of humanitarian intervention. In: Katzenstein PJ (ed) The culture of national security: norms and identity in world politics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Finnemore M, Kathryn S (1998) International norm dynamics and political change. International organization 52(4): 887–917 Google Scholar
  31. Funke N, Shanna N, Henwood R (2011) Scientists as lobbyists? How science can make its voice heard in the South African policy‐making arena. J Public Aff 11(4):287–296Google Scholar
  32. Funke N (2014) Public policy making in South Africa: theory and practice. Lecture presented at the University of PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  33. Füssel HM, Klein RJ (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Change 75(3):301–329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Giddens A (1990) The consequences of modernity. Polity Press,  CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Gillings A (2010) How earth made use: water. BBC, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Goode WJ (1997) Rational choice theory. Am Sociologist 28(2):22–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Guba EG, Lincoln YS (2005) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  38. Hall PA (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comp Politics 25(3):275–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hay C (1995) Structure and agency. In: Marsch D, Stoker G (eds) Theory and methods in political science. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Heshusius L (1994) Freeing ourselves from objectivity: managing subjectivity or turning toward a participatory mode of consciousness? Educ Researcher 23(3):15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hess JJ, McDowell JZ, Luber G (2012) Integrating climate change adaptation into public health practice: using adaptive management to increase adaptive capacity and build resilience. Environ Health Perspect 120(2):171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Heywood A (1997) Politics. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Heywood A (1999) Political theory: an introduction, 2nd edn. St Martin’s Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hobson JM (1997) The wealth of states: a comparative sociology of international economic and political change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Hobson JM (2000) The state and international relations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hobson JM (2001) The ‘second state debate’ in international relations: theory turned upside-down. Rev Int Stud 27(3):395–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hobson JM, Seabrooke L (2007) Everyday IPE: revealing everyday forms of change in the world economy. In: Hobson JM, Seabrooke L (eds) Everyday politics of the world economy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Holling CS (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Howlett M, Wellstead AM (2011) Policy analysts in the bureaucracy revisited: the nature of professional policy work in contemporary government. Politics Policy 49(4):613–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Huntington SP (1991) Transnational organisations in world politics. In: Little R, Smith M (eds) Perspectives on world politics. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  51. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Glossary of terms used in the IPCC fourth assessment report: working group II (WG2). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ParisGoogle Scholar
  52. Jackson R, Sørensen G (2003) Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Jacobi D, Weber C, Hellmann G (2014) Dissident foreign policy and the (re-) production of international orders. In: Wagner, W Werner, W and Onderco, M (eds.), Deviance in International Relations: ‘Rogue state’ and international security. Palgrave Macmillan, HoundmillsGoogle Scholar
  54. Jacobs IM, Nienaber S (2011) Waters without borders: transboundary water governance and the role of the ‘transdisciplinary individual’ in Southern Africa. Water SA 37(5):665–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jägerskog A (2003) Why states cooperate over shared water: the water negotiations in the Jordan River basin. Department of Water and Environmental Studies, Linköping University, LinköpingGoogle Scholar
  56. Jägerskog A (2013) Transboundary water management—why it is important and why it needs to be developed. Stockholm International Water Institute and the United Nations Development Programme Shared Waters Partnership, Stockholm. Accessed at: http://www.watergovernance.org/documents/WGF/Reports/TWM-why-it-is-important.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2014
  57. Jarraud M, Steiner A (2007) Foreword. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Marquis M, Averyt K, Tignor MMB, Miller HL, Chen Z (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis—contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  58. John J, Oosthuizen R, Le Roux A, Murambadoro M, Engelbrecht F, Meissner R, Mambo J, Moyo E, Ndarana T (2015) City of Tshwane vulnerability assessment to climate change. Report Number: CSIR/NRE/GC/ER/2015/0048/B, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  59. Karar E (2014) South Africa hosts gender water and development conference. Water Research Commission Press ReleaseGoogle Scholar
  60. Kelly PM, Adger WN (2000) Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim Change 47(4):325–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kistin EJ, Ashton PJ (2008) Adapting to change in transboundary rivers: an analysis of treaty flexibility on the Orange-Senqu River basin. Water Resour Dev 24(3):385–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Klotz A (1995) Norms reconstituting interests: global racial equality and U.S. sanction against South Africa. Int Org 49(3):451–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kooiman J, Bavinck M (2013) Theorizing governability—the interactive governance perspective. In: Bavinck M, Chuenpagdee R, Jentoft S, Kooiman J (eds) Governability of fisheries and aquaculture: theory and applications. Springer, Dordrecht Google Scholar
  64. Krasner SD (1982) Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables. International Organization 36: 2Google Scholar
  65. Kratochwil FV (2007) Evidence, inference, and truth as problems of theory building in the social sciences. In: Lebow RN, Lichbach MI (eds) Theory and evidence in comparative politics and international relations. Palgrave MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Kurki M (2006) Cause of a divided discipline: rethinking the concept of cause in international relations. Rev Int Stud 32(2):189–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kurki M, Wight C (2013) International relations and social science. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S (eds) International relations theories: discipline and diversity, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  68. Ladle RJ, Jepson P, Whittaker RJ (2005) Scientists and the media: the struggle for legitimacy in climate change and conservation science. Interdisc Sci Rev 30(3):231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lim B, Spanger-Siegfried E, Burton I, Malone E, Huq S (eds) (2005) Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: developing strategies, policies and measures. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  70. Lincoln YS, Lynham SA, Guba EG (2011) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  71. Lundin M, Öberg P-O (2013) Expert knowledge use and deliberation in local policy making. Policy Sci 47(1):25–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. McLain RJ, Lee RG (1996) Adaptive management: promises and pitfalls. Environ Manage 20(4):437–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Meissner R (1998) Piping water from the Okavango River to Namibia—the role of communities and pressure groups in water politics. Global Dialogue 3(2):1998Google Scholar
  74. Meissner R (2003) Regional food security and virtual water: some natural, political and economic implications. In: Hoekstra AY (ed) Virtual water trade: proceedings of the expert meeting on virtual water trade. Research report series no. 12, IHE Delft, Delft, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  75. Meissner R (2004a) The transnational role and involvement of interest groups in water politics: a comparative analysis of selected Southern Africa case studies. D.Phil. Dissertation, Faculty of Humanities, University of PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  76. Meissner R (2004b) Addressing poverty on a global scale. SADC Barometer 7:2–4Google Scholar
  77. Meissner R (2004c) Going for the MDGs. SADC Barometer 7:1Google Scholar
  78. Meissner R (2014) Who wants to be an agent? a framework to analyse water politics and governance. Water SA 40(1):1–9   CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Meissner R (2015) The governance of urban wastewater treatment infrastructure in the Greater Sekhukhune District Municipality and the application of analytic eclecticism. Int J Water Gov, 3(2):79–110  Google Scholar
  80. Meissner R (2016a) Paradigms and theories in water governance: the case of South Africa’s national water resource strategy, second edition. Water SA 42(1):1–10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Meissner R (2016b) Water security in Southern Africa: Discourses securitising water and the implications for water governance and politics. In Pahl-Wostl C, Bhaburi A and Gupta, J. (eds.), Handbook on Water Security. Edward Elgar Publishing, NorthamptonGoogle Scholar
  82. Meissner R, Jacobs I (2016) Theorising complex water governance in Africa: the case of the proposed Epupa Dam on the Kunene River. Int Environ Agreements Polit Law Econom 14(2):21–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Meissner R, Ramasar V (2015) Governance and politics in the upper Limpopo River basin, South Africa. GeoJournal 80(5):689–709Google Scholar
  84. Meissner R, Turton AR (2003) The hydrosocial contract theory and the Lesotho Highlands water project. Water Policy 5(2):115–126Google Scholar
  85. Meissner R, Funke N, Nienaber S, Ntombela C (2013) The status quo of research on South Africa’s water resources management institutions. Water SA 39(5):721–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Mercer J (2005) Rationality and psychology in international politics. Int Org 59:78–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Merrey DJ (2008) Is normative integrated water resources management implementable? carting a practical course with lessons from Southern Africa. Phys Chem Earth 33:899–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Miller D, Hartwick J, Breton-Miller I (2004) How to detect a management fad—and distinguish it from a classic. Bus Horiz 47(4):7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Nakamura RT (1986) The textbook policy process and implementation research. Rev Policy Res 7(1):142–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. National Planning Commission (NPC) (2011) National development plan: vision for 2030. National Planning Commission, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  91. Nel P (1999) Theories of international relations. In: Nel P, McGowan PJ (eds) Power, wealth and global order: an international relations textbook for Africa. University of Cape Town Press, Rondebosch, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  92. Nel JL, Driver A, Strydom WF, Maherry A, Petersen C, Hill L, Roux DJ, Nienaber S, Van Deventer H, Swartz E, Smith-Adao LB (2011) Atlas of freshwater ecosystem priority areas in South Africa: maps to support sustainable development of water resources. WRC report no. TT 500/11, Water Research Commission, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  93. Neme LA (1997) The power of a few: Bureaucratic decision-making in the Okavango Delta. J Mod Afr Stud 35(1):37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Offe C (1997) Micro-aspects of democratic theory: what makes for the deliberative competence of citizens? In: Hadehuis A (ed) Democracy’s victory and crisis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  95. Oneal JR, Russett BM (1997) The classical liberals were right: democracy, interdependence, and conflict, 1950–1985. Int Stud Q 41:267–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Onuf N (1998) Constructivism: a user’s manual. In: Kubálková V, Onuf N, Kowert P (eds) International relations in a constructed world. M.E. Sharpe, ArmonkGoogle Scholar
  97. Ostrom E (1991) Rational choice theory and institutional analysis: toward complementarity. Am Polit Sci Rev 85(1):237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ostrom E (1998) A behavioural approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. Am Polit Sci Rev 92(1):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (OALD) (2013), Hornby A.S (ed.)  8th Edition Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  101. Price R (1998) Reversing the gun sights: transnational civil society targets land mines. Int Org 52(3):613–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Reisner M (1993) Cadillac desert: the American west and its disappearing water. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  103. Republic of South Africa (RSA) (1997) Water services act. Act 108 of 1997. Government Printer, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  104. Republic of South Africa (RSA) (1998) National water act. Act 36 of 1998. Government Printer, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  105. Ritzer G (2000) Sociological theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  106. Rogers K, Roux D, Biggs H (2000) Challenges for catchment management agencies: lessons from bureaucracies, business and resource management. Water SA 26(4):505–511Google Scholar
  107. Roux D, Murray K, Van Wyk E (2009) Enabling effective learning in catchment management agencies: a philosophy and strategy. WRC report no. TT 421/09, Water Research Commission, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  108. Rust U, Hanise B (2009) The impact of gender in the rural water services environment of SA. Report no. TT407/09, Water Research Commission, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  109. Sacks P (1980) Review article. State structure and the asymmetrical society: an approach to public policy in Britain. Comp Politics 12(3):349–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Scholz I (2008) Global environmental governance and its influence on national water policies. In: Scheumann W, Neubert S, Kipping M (eds) Water politics and development cooperation. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  111. Schreiner B, van Koppen B (2001) From bucket to basin: poverty, gender, and integrated water management in South Africa. In: Abernethy CL (ed) Intersectoral management of river basins. Proceedings of an international workshop on integrated water management in water-stressed river basins in developing countries: strategies for poverty alleviation and agricultural growth, Loskop Dam, South Africa, 16–21 October 2000. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri Lanka; German Foundation for International Development (DSE), Feldafing, Germany Google Scholar
  112. Schwandt TA (2007) The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  113. Schulze RE (2011a) Approaches towards practical adaptive management options for selected water related sectors in South Africa in a context of climate change. Water SA 37(5):621–646Google Scholar
  114. Schulze RE (2011b) A 2011 perspective on climate change and the South African water sector. WRC report no. 1843/2/11, Water research commission, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  115. Scott J (2000) Rational choice theory. In: Browning G, Halcli A, Webster F (eds) Understanding contemporary society: theories of the present. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  116. Seago CJ, McKenzie RS (2007) An assessment of non-revenue water in South Africa. Water Research Commission, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  117. Sil R (2000) The foundations of eclecticism: the epistemological status of agency, culture, and structure in social theory. J Theor Polit 12(3):353–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Smith S (1997) New approaches to international theory. In: Baylis J, Smith S (eds) The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  119. Smith S (2007) The discipline of international relations: still an American social science. Br J Politics Int Relat 2(3):374–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Stankey GH, Clark RN, Bormann BT (2005) Adaptive management of natural resources: theory, concepts, and management institutions. General technical report PNW-GTR-654, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Services, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  121. Stern G (2000) The structure of international society: an introduction to the study of international relations. Pinter, London Google Scholar
  122. Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI) (2012) Why shared waters matter. Stockholm International Water Institute, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  123. Stone A (1994) What is a supranational constitution? an essay in international relations theory. Rev Politics 56(3):441–474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Stuart-Hill SI, Schulze RE (2010) Does South Africa’s water law and policy allow for climate change adaptation? Climate and Development, 2(2):128–144  Google Scholar
  125. The World Justice Project (2014) Dr. Anders Jägerskog. Available at: http://worldjusticeproject.org/world-justice-forum-iv/agenda/speaker/dr-anders. Accessed 23 July 2014
  126. Turton A, Meissner R (2002) The Hydrosocial Contract and Its Manifestation in Society: A South African Case Study. In: Turton AR and Henwood R (eds.), Hydropolitics in the Developing World: A Southern African Perspective. Pretoria: African Water Issues Research Unit. Pretoria: African Water Issues Research Unit (AWIRU)  Google Scholar
  127. Turton A (2005) Hydro hegemony in the context of the Orange River basin. Paper presented at the workshop on hydro hegemony, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 20–21 May 2005, LondonGoogle Scholar
  128. United Nations (UN) (1987) Our common future: report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  129. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2003) Human development report 2003: Millennium development goals: a compact among nations to end human poverty. United Nations Development Programme, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  130. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2014a) Empowered lives. Resilient nations. United Nations Development Programme, New York. Available at: http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home.html. Accessed 22 Sept 2014
  131. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2014b) Environment and energy. United Nations Development Programme, New York. Available at: http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourwork/environmentandenergy/overview.html. Accessed 22 Sept 2014
  132. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2014c) Water and ocean governance. United Nations Development Programme, New York. Available at: http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourwork/environmentandenergy/focus_areas/water_and_ocean_governance/. Accessed 22 July 2014
  133. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2014d) Transboundary waters programme. United Nations Development Programme, New York. Available at: http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourwork/environmentandenergy/focus_areas/water_and_ocean_governance/transboundary-waters/. Accessed 22 July 2014
  134. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2014e) Integrated water resources management. United Nations Development Programme, New York. Available at: http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourwork/environmentandenergy/focus_areas/water_and_ocean_governance/integrated-water-resources-management/. Accessed 22 July 2014
  135. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2014f) Gender and water. United Nations Development Programme, New York. Available at: http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourwork/environmentandenergy/focus_areas/water_and_ocean_governance/gender-and-water/. Accessed 22 July 2014
  136. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2014g) Adaptation to climate change. United Nations Development Programme, New York. Available at: http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourwork/environmentandenergy/focus_areas/water_and_ocean_governance/adaptation-climate-change/. Accessed 22 July 2014
  137. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2014h) Mainstreaming human rights. United Nations Development Programme, New York. Available at: http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourwork/environmentandenergy/focus_areas/water_and_ocean_governance/human-rights-based-approaches/. Accessed 23 July 2014
  138. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI) (2014a) What is water governance? United Nations Development Programme and the Stockholm International Water Institute, New York and Stockholm. Available at: http://www.watergovernance.org/whatiswatergovernance. Accessed 23 July 2014
  139. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI) (2014b) Shared waters partnership. United Nations Development Programme and the Stockholm International Water Institute, New York and Stockholm. Available at: http://www.watergovernance.org/sa/node.asp?node=1467. Accessed 22 July 2014
  140. Van Koppen B, Schreiner B (2014) Moving beyond integrated water resource management: developmental water management in South Africa. Int J Water Resour Dev ahead-of-print:1–16Google Scholar
  141. Viotti PR, Kauppi MV (1999) International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, and beyond. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  142. Wallin C (2014) Re-conceptualizing the pursuit of national interests in world politics—augmenting the realist concept of national interests to include constructivist theories on identity. MA thesis in political science, Swedish National Defence College, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  143. Warner J (2005) Multi-stakeholder platforms: Integrating society in water resource management? Ambiente Soc 8(2):1–21 Google Scholar
  144. Wendt A (1999) Social theory of international politics, Cambridge Studies in International Relations 67. University of Cambridge Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  145. Weber R (2004) The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: A personal view. MIS Quarterly 28(1):iii–xii  Google Scholar
  146. Weber C (2014) International relations theory: a critical introduction, 4th edn. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  147. Ziervogel G, Methner N (2009) A local government guide to climate change adaptation planning. Climate Systems Analysis Group, University of Cape Town, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  148. Zybrands W (2011) Local government. In: Venter A, Landsberg C (eds) Government and politics in South Africa, 4th edn. Van Schaik Publishers, PretoriaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)PretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations