Smart Contracts and Licensing



Contracts are agreements, which involve moving certain assets or value from one owner to another based on a condition or set of conditions between people or things. Considering the fact that institutions and central organizations are commonly fundamental as trusted authorities, part of their central operations can be condensed into smart contracts that are controlled by decentralized consent on a blockchain. The idea behind smart contracts and smart licensing of proprietary material (e.g., software, music and digital art) is that the contractual control of transactions between two or more entities is confirmable programmatically through the blockchain instead of through a central gatekeeper or arbitrator. Smart contracts eliminate the need for two parties to depend on a central authority because they ‘can agree’ between themselves, define the terms and implications of their agreement programmatically and conditionally, with automatic asset releases when fulfilling services in a sequential manner, or incur penalties if not fulfilled. Due to the ability of the blockchain technology as an indisputable endorser of dealings, each peer can go ahead and have trust in each other because the framework of governance, contracts, trust, and agreements dwell on top of the technology. To this end, this chapter will describe how organizations can leverage the smart contract technology by integrating smart contract code and the blockchain for the purpose of overseeing agreements and licensing. It then explains the benefits, the down sides as well as realistic case studies on the use of smart contracts in various industries.


Financial Institution Dispute Resolution Legal Document World Economic Forum Music Industry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Hart O, Moore J (2002) Contracts as reference points. Q J Econ CXVII:1–48Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Taylor R (1984) Licensing in theory and practice: licensor-licensee relationships. Antitrust Law J 53:561. 1Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The Law Handbook: What is a contract? Available online at: Accessed 25 Aug 2016
  4. 4.
    BusinessDictionary: Contract. Available online at: Accessed 23 Aug 2016
  5. 5.
    Lim C, Saw T, Sargeant C, Smart contracts: bridging the gap between expectation and reality. Available online at: Accessed 25 August 2016
  6. 6.
    Szabo N (1997) Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday 2(9)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cassano J, What are smart contracts? Cryptocurrency’s Killer App. Available online at: Accessed 25 Aug 2016
  8. 8.
    Idelberger F, Governatori G, Riveret R, Sartor G (2015) Evaluation of logic-based smart contracts for blockchain systems. In: Alferes JJ, Bertossi L, Governatori G, Fodor P, Dumitru R (eds) Rule technologies. research, tools, and applications 10th international symposium, RuleML 2016, Stony Brook, NY, USA, July 6–9, 2016. Volume 9718 of the series lecture notes in computer science, pp 167–183, Springer, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greenspan G, Why many smart contract use cases are simply impossible. Available online at: Accessed 28 Aug 2016
  10. 10.
    Lewis A, A gentle introduction to smart contracts. Available online at: Accessed 28 Aug 2016
  11. 11.
    Levine M, Herbalife deals and blockchain dreams. Available online at: Accessed 29 Aug 2016
  12. 12.
    Stark J, How close are smart contracts to impacting real-world law? Available online at: Accessed 24 Aug 2016
  13. 13.
    Delmolino K, Arnett M, Kosba AE, Miller A, Shi E (2015) Step by step towards creating a safe smart contract: lessons and insights from a cryptocurrency lab. IACR Cryptol ePrint Arch 460Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wall L, “Smart contracts” in a complex world. Available online at: Accessed 29 Aug 2016
  15. 15.
    Stark J, Making sense of blockchain smart contracts. Available online at: Accessed 24 Aug 2016
  16. 16.
    Troy S What is a smart contract and what’s it good for? Available online at: Accessed 24 Aug 2016
  17. 17.
    Ressler S, Bitcoin micropayments, a new enabling technology. Available online at: Accessed 29 Aug 2016
  18. 18.
    Isaacson W, How bitcoin could save journalism and the arts. Available online at: Accessed 29 Aug 2016
  19. 19.
    Perez YB, How blockchain tech is inspiring the art world. Available online at: Accessed 27 Aug 2016
  20. 20.
    Stephan Vogler: Introduction. Available online at: Accessed 3 Sept 2016
  21. 21.
    Ghorashi H, Mak Vienna becomes first museum to use bitcoin to acquire art, a harm Van Den Dorpel. Available online at: Accessed 24 Aug 2016
  22. 22.
    Emory S, Here’s the first museum to buy art with bitcoins. Available online at: Accessed 28 Aug 2016
  23. 23.
    Gottfried G, How “the blockchain” could actually change the music industry. Available online at: Accessed 24 Aug 2016
  24. 24.
    Hoskinson C, A brief introduction to smart contracts. Available online at: Accessed 29 Aug 2016
  25. 25.
    Xu X, Pautasso C, Zhu L et al (2016) The blockchain as a software connector. 2016 13th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2016), Venice, 2016, pp. 182–191Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    SmartContract: Smart contract oracles. Available online at:
  27. 27.
    Ellis L (2013) Housing and mortgage markets: the long run, the short run and the uncertainty in between 8:1–16Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Benson E (2013) Mockup driven web development. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on world wide web companion, pp 337–341Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Delmolino K, Arnett M, Kosba A et al (2015) A Programmer’s guide to ethereum and serpent acquiring the virtual machine, Available at Accessed 4th January 2017
  30. 30.
    Nakamoto S (2008) Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. 9. www.Bitcoin.Org
  31. 31.
    Back A, Corallo M, Dashjr L, Friedenbach M, Maxwell G, Miller A, Poelstra A, Timón J, Wuille P (2014) Enabling blockchain innovations with pegged sidechains, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brown C, How companies are using ethereum as an advanced version of bitcoin. Available online at: Accessed 2 Sept 2016
  33. 33.
    Koulu R (2016) Blockchains and online dispute resolution : smart contracts as an alternative to enforcement. Scripted A J Law Technol Soc 13Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schneider N, Meet Vitalik Buterin, the 20-year-old who is decentralizing everything. Available online at: Accessed 24 Aug 2016
  35. 35.
    Buterin V (2014) A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. Etherum 1–36Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Coy P, Kharif O, This is your company on blockchain. Available online at: Accessed 29 Aug 2016
  37. 37.
    Blomqvist K, Levy J (2006) Collaboration capability–a focal concept in knowledge creation and collaborative innovation in networks. Int J Manag Concepts …. 2:31–48Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Root GN, The importance of communication between different departments in an organization. Available online at: Accessed 13 Sept 2016
  39. 39.
    Walton RE, Dutton JM (2016) The management of interdepartmental conflict : a model and review 14:73–84Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hulland J, Nenkov GY, Barclay DW (2012) Perceived marketing-sales relationship effectiveness: a matter of justice. J Acad Mark Sci 40:450–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chesebro R (2015) A contract that manages itself: the time has arrived, Defense AT&L: January–February 2015Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lehmann A, Why banks shouldn’t fear blockchain. Available online at: Accessed 29 Aug 2016
  43. 43.
    Allianz Press Release: Blockchain technology successfully piloted by Allianz Risk Transfer and Nephila for catastrophe swap. Available online at: Accessed 3 Sept 2016
  44. 44.
    Palmer D, Allianz tests blockchain to boost catastrophe bond trades. Available online at: Accessed 3 Sept 2016
  45. 45.
    Kharpal A, Barclays used blockchain tech to trade derivatives. Available online at: Accessed 1 Sept 2016
  46. 46.
    Levine M, Conflicted deals and stress tests. Available online at: Accessed 29 Aug 2016
  47. 47.
    Yermack D (2015) Corporate governance and blockchains. NBER Working Paper Series December. Available at Accessed 20 Nov 2016
  48. 48.
    Levine M, Kitten hugs and the blockchain heart. Available online at: Accessed 29 Aug 2016
  49. 49.
    Fairfield J (2014) Smart contracts, bitcoin bots, and consumer protection. Wash Lee Law Rev Online 71:35–50. Accessed 3 Sept 2016Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wood G, DEVCON1: ethereum. Available online at: Accessed 29 Aug 2016
  51. 51.
    Cuomo J, How businesses and governments can capitalize on blockchain. Available online at: Accessed 9 Sept 2016
  52. 52.
    Clack CD, Bakshi VA, Braine L (2016) Smart contract templates: foundations, design landscape and research directions, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Parsons JE (2013) Hit or Miss: regulating derivative markets to reduce hedging costs at non-financial companies, MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, CEEPR WP 2013-002, January 2013Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Teh T-L (2015) Counterfactuals for the appraisal of disaster risk financing and insurance strategies. Br Actuar J 20:241–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Camerinelli E, Blockchain in the supply chain. Available online at: Accessed 3 Sept 2016
  56. 56.
    McWaters J (2016) The future of financial infrastructure—an ambitious look at how blockchain can reshape financial services, An Industry Project of the Financial Services Community | Prepared in collaboration with Deloitte, World Economic Forum. Available at Accessed 20 Nov 2016

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management and TechnologyBocconi UniversityMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations