Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Book cover

S-BPM in the Production Industry pp 27–67Cite as

S-BPM’s Industrial Capabilities

S-BPM’s Industrial Capabilities

  • Matthias Neubauer3,
  • Christian Stary3,
  • Udo Kannengiesser4,
  • Richard Heininger4,
  • Alexandra Totter5 &
  • …
  • David Bonaldi5 
  • Chapter
  • Open Access
  • First Online: 16 December 2016
  • 5497 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

S-BPM targets Business Process Management and has been applied in various business domains to model business processes and implement workflow support. This chapter investigates S-BPM’s capabilities to support workplace and process design as well as process execution in production companies. Thereby, industrial capabilities of S-BPM are structured along the three dimensions of socio-technical systems which need to be considered for Industry 4.0 developments. Technological capabilities address the ability to integrate processes on different automation levels (planning, monitoring, real-time execution, etc.). Organizational capabilities discuss the potential of subject orientation for organizational development, and human capability development investigates how humans in production companies could be supported when involving them in workplace (re)design.

Keywords

  • Business Process
  • Work Knowledge
  • Business Process Management
  • Programmable Logic Controller
  • Business Object

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Download chapter PDF

References

  • Ates, A., & Bititci, U. (2011). Change process: A key enabler for building resilient SMEs. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5601–5618.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R. (1996). Weiterbildung - Ermöglichungsdidaktische Grundlagen. München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschoff, F.-R., Bernardi, A., & Schwarz, S. (2003). Weakly-structured workflows for knowledge-intensive tasks: An experimental evaluation. In Proceedings IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE’03) (pp. 340–345).

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., Kugeler, M., & Rosemann, M. (Eds.). (2008). Prozessmanagement (6th ed.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaldi, D., Totter, A., & Pinter, E. (2011). Towards contextual S-BPM—method and case study. In W. Schmidt (Ed.), S-PBM ONE—Learning by Doing—Doing by Learning. 3rd International Conference S-BPM ONE 2011, Ingolstadt, Germany, September 29–30, 2011 Proceedings (pp. 98–108). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börger, E., & Fleischmann, A. (2015). Abstract state machine nets: Closing the gap between business process models and their implementation. In J. Ehlers, & B. Thalheim (Eds.), S-BPM ONE’15 Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Subject-Oriented Business Process Management. New York: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2723839.2723840.

  • Bruno, G., Dengler, F., Jennings, B. K., Khalaf, R., Nurcan, S., Prilla, M., et al. (2011). Key challenges for enabling agile BPM with social software. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 23(4), 297–326. doi:10.1002/smr.523.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2010). The power of identity. The information age: Economy, society, and culture (2nd ed.). Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. Q., Lee, T. E., Zhang, R., & Zhang, Y. J. (2003). System requirements for organizational learning. Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 73–78.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ciuciu, I., Zhao, G., Mülle, J., von Stackelberg, S., Vasquez, C., Haberecht, T., et al. (2011). Semantic support for security-annotated business process models. Enterprise, business-process and information systems modeling (pp. 284–298). Berlin: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, D., & Hull, R. (2009). Business artifacts: A data-centric approach to modeling business operations and processes. Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering, 32(3), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, F. A. (2009). Building the agile enterprise: With SOA, BPM and MBM. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • de Castro, R. P. L., Armayor, D. P., Gómez, J. M., Mosquera, I. S., & Batista, J. A. D. (2010). Semantic supported modeling and orchestration of logistic integrated processes, with focus on supply chain: Framework design. ICT Innovations 2009 (pp. 285–294). Berlin: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Edelmann, W. (2000). Lernpsychologie. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbank, J. F., & Williams, S. D. (2001). Motivating creativity and enhancing innovation through employee suggestion system technology. Creativity and Innovation Management, 10(2), 68–74.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fdhila, W., Indiono, C., Rinderle-Ma, S., & Reichert, M. (2015). Dealing with change in process choreographies: Design and implementation of propagation algorithms. Information Systems, 49(4), 1–24.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Filipowska, A., Kaczmarek, M., Koschmider, A., Stein, S., Wecel, K., & Abramowicz, W. (2011). Social software and semantics for business process management-alternative or synergy? Journal of Systems Integration, 2(3), 54–69.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, H.-P. (1989). Die Arbeit des Sisyphus oder unsere Mission als Bildungsbereich in einer Automobilfabrik. In T. Sattelberger (Ed.), Innovative Personalentwicklung (pp. 42–53). Konzepte, Erfahrungen, Gabler, Wiesbaden: Grundlagen.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fischermann, G. (2006). Praxishandbuch Prozessmanagement, ibo Schriftenreihe Band 9, Gießen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., Stary, C., Obermeier, S., & Börger, E. (2012). Subject-oriented business process management. Berlin: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., & Stary C. (2013). Subject-oriented BPM = socially executable BPM. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Business Informatics, Vienna, Austria (pp. 399–406).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaitanides, M. (1983). Prozessorganisation. Entwicklung, Ansätze und Programme prozessorientierter Organisationsgestaltung. München: Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geißler, H. (Ed.). (1995). Organisationslernen und Weiterbildung. Die strategische Antwort auf Herausforderungen der Zukunft. Neuwied/Berlin: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, C. (2011). When worlds collide in manufacturing operations: ISA-95 Best Practices Book 2.0. International Society of Automation, Research Triangle Park, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, S. S. (1999). Adaptive enterprise: Creating and leading sense-and-respond organizations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, S., Karnouskos, S., & Schroth, C. (2009). The internet of things in an enterprise context. In J. Domingue, D. Fensel, & P. Traverso (Eds.), FIS 2008 (Vol. 5468, pp. 14–28). Lecture notes in computer science. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. (1996). Beyond reengineering: How the process-centered organization is changing our lives. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. (1999). How process enterprises really work. Harvard Business Review, 77(6), 108–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heravizadeh, M., & Edmond, D. (2008). Making workflows context-aware: A way to support knowledge-intensive tasks. In Proceedings of the Fifth Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling, Wollongong, Australia, (Vol. 79, pp. 79–88).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, T. (2000). Lernendes workflow. In Verbesserung von Geschäftsprozessen mit flexiblen Workflow-Management-Systemen (Band 4). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, T., Hoffmann, M., Kunau, G., & Loser, K. U. (2004). A modelling method for the development of groupware applications as socio-technical systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(2), 119–135.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H. H., Tran, P. C. T., & Le, T. M. (2010). State of the art of semantic business process management: An investigation on approaches for business-to-business integration. Intelligent Information and Database Systems (pp. 154–165). Berlin: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzblatt, K. (2001). Contextual design: Experience in real life, In H. Oberquelle, R. Oppermann & J. Krause (Eds.), Mensch & Computer, B.G. Teuber, Stuttgart, pp. 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzblatt, K., Burns Wendell, J., & Wood, S. (2005). Rapid Contextual Design: A How-to Guide to Key Techniques for User-Centered Design, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzblatt, K., & Beyer, H. R. (2014). Contextual design. In M. Soegaard, & R. F. Dam (Eds.), The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction (2nd ed). Aarhus, Denmark: The Interaction Design Foundation. Retrieved July 18, 2016, from https://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/contextual_design.html.

  • IEC. (2007). IEC 62264–3 Enterprise-control system integration. Part 3: Activity models of manufacturing operations management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Retrieved July 18, 2016, from http://www.acatech.de/de/publikationen/stellungnahmen/kooperationen/detail/artikel/recommendations-for-implementing-the-strategic-initiative-industrie-40-final-report-of-the-industr.html.

  • Kannengiesser, U. (2015). Agents implementing subject behaviour: A manufacturing scenario. In A. Fleischmann, W. Schmidt, & C. Stary (Eds.), S-BPM in the wild: Practical value creation (pp. 201–216). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannengiesser, U., Neubauer, M., & Heininger, R. (2016). Integrating business processes and manufacturing operations based on S-BPM and B2MML. In J. L. Sanz (Ed.), S-BPM ONE 2016. New York: ACM Digital Library. Article 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannengiesser, U., Totter, A., & Bonaldi, D. (2014). An interactional view of context in business processes. In C. v (Ed.), S-BPM ONE—Application Studies and Work in Progress, CCIS 422 (pp. 42–54). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddis, N., Burdalo, J., Kainz, G., & Zoitl, A. (2014). Increasing the adaptability of manufacturing systems by using data-centric communication. In IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, Barcelona, Spain (pp. 1–8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. (1993). A framework and methodology for linking individual and organizational learning: Applications in TQM and product development. Ph.D. Thesis, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, G., & Suh, Y. (2012). Building semantic business process space for agile and efficient business processes management: Ontology-based approach. In Business enterprise, process, and technology management: Models and applications (Vol. 51).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchmer, M. (2011). What has Jazz to do with MPE? In High performance through process excellence, Chap. 11 (pp. 159–169). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konjack, G. (2010). Case study: AST order control processing. In H. Buchwald, et al. (Eds.), S-BPM ONE—Setting the Stage for Subject-Oriented Business Process Management, CCIS 85 (pp. 115–120). Heidelberg: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Korpelainen, E., & Kira, M. (2013). Systems approach for analysing problems in IT system adoption at work. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(3), 247–262.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, M., Rüßmann, M., Strack, R., Lueth, K.L., & Bolle, M. (2015). Man and machine in Industry 4.0. How will technology transform the industrial workforce through 2025? The Boston Consulting Group, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthiesen, P., Watson, J. A., Bandara, W., & Rosemann, M. (2011). Applying social technology to business process lifecycle management. In R. Schmidt, & S. Nurcan (Eds.), Proceedings BPMS2’11, 4th Workshop on Business Process Management and Social Software. Retrieved July 15, 2016, from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/43384/.

  • McClellan, M. (1997). Applying manufacturing execution systems. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (2006). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendes, J. M., Leitão, P., Colombo, A. W., & Restivo, F. (2012). High-level petri nets for the process description and control in service-oriented manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 50(6), 1650–1665.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mendling, J., Reijers, H. A., & Recker, J. (2010). Activity labeling in process modeling: Empirical insights and recommendations. Information Systems, 35(4), 467–482.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • MESA. (2013). Business to manufacturing markup language (B2MML), Version 6. Chandler: Manufacturing Enterprise Solutions Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, N., Feiner, T., Radmayr, M., Blei, D., & Fleischmann, A. (2011). Dynamic catenation and execution of cross organisational business processes—the jCPEX! approach. In S-BPM ONE 2010, CCIS 138 (pp. 84–105). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, G. P. (2012). Who am I? Who is she? A naturalistic, holistic, somatic approach to personal identity. Frankfurt: Ontos.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. (2012). Using S-BPM for PLC code generation and extension of subject-oriented methodology to all layers of modern control systems. In C. Stary (Ed.), S-BPM One—Scientific Research, LNBIP 104 (pp. 182–204). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, S., et al. (2011). CGAA/EES at NEC Corporation, powered by S-BPM: The subject-oriented BPM development technique using top-down approach. In W. Schmidt (Ed.), S-BPM ONE—Learning by Doing—Doing by Learning, CCIS 213 (pp. 215–231). Heidelberg: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Niggemann, O., Henning, S., Schriegel, S., Otto, J., & Anis, A. (2015). Models for adaptable automation software: An overview of plug-and-produce in industrial automation (pp. 73–82). Dagstuhl Work-shop MBEES: Modellbasierte Entwicklung eingebetteter Systeme XI, fortiss GmbH, München, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Von Krogh, G. (2009). Perspective—Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635–652.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, E. W., Chau, D. C., & Chan, T. L. A. (2011). Information technology, operational, and management competencies for supply chain agility: Findings from case studies. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(3), 232–249.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120–131.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pipero, C., & Manjunath, K. (2006). ISA 95 implementation best practices: Workflow descriptions using B2MML. In WBF North American Conference, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilla, M., Schermann, M., Herrmann, I. T., & Krcmar, H. (2012). Process modeling with SeeMe: A modeling method for service processes. In T. Böhmann, W. Burr, Th. Herrmann, & H. Krcmar (Eds.), Implementing international services. A tailorable method for market assessment, modularization, and process transfer (pp. 67–81). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pütz, G., & Lüger, R. (2003). Flucht in die Technik oder neue Qualität des betrieblichen Lernens?. In P. Mambrey, V. Pipek, & M. Rohde (Eds.), Wissen und Lernen in virtuellen Organisationen. Konzepte, Praxisbeispiele, Perspektiven (pp. 199–215). Heidelberg: Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, M., Bruckman, A., & Martin, F. (1996). Pianos, not stereos. Creating computer construction kits. Interactions, 3(8), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieckmann, H. (1997). Managen und Führen am Rande des 3. Jahrtausends: Theoretisches, Bedenkliches. Peter Lang, Frankfurt/Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., & Dadam, P. (2004). Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems—a survey. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 50(1), 9–34.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rosemann, M., Recker, J. C., & Flender, C. (2008). Contextualisation of business processes. International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management, 3(1), 47–60.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Saidani, O., & Nurcan, S. (2007). Towards context aware business process modelling. In 8th Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support (BPMDS’07), CAiSE (Vol. 7, p. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salovaara, A., & Tamminen, S. (2009). Acceptance or appropriation? A design-oriented critique of technology acceptance models. In P. Saariluoma & H. Isomaki (Eds.), Future interaction design II (pp. 157–173). London: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sambamurthy, V., Anandhi, B., & Varun, G. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, A. W. (1999). ARIS-business process modeling (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, B. (2007). The road to integration: A guide to applying the ISA-95 Standard in manufacturing. Research Triangle Park, NC: International Society of Automation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, G., Akkermans, R., Anjewierden, A., Hoog, R., Shadbolt, N., DeVelde, W. V., et al. (2002). Knowledge engineering and management: The common KADS methodology. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger, M. (2000). Intelligente Organisationen: Strukturen für organisationale Intelligenz und Kreativität. In A. Papmehl, & R. Siewers (Eds.), Wissen im Wandel. Die lernende Organisation im 21. Jahrhundert (pp. 317–360). Wien: Wirtschaftsverlag Ueberreiter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, D. (2005). Organisational identity and self-transformation: An autopoietic perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline, the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setiawan, M. A., Sadiq, S., & Kirkman, R. (2011). Facilitating business process improvement through personalized recommendation. In Business information systems (Vol. 87, pp. 136–147). Lecture notes in business information processing. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, A. R., & Rosemann, M. (2012). ‘Processpedia’: An ecological environment for BPM stakeholders’ collaboration. Business Process Management Journal, 18(1), 20–42.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sinur, J., Odell, J., & Fingar, P. (2013). Business process management: The next wave. Tampa: Meghan-Kiffer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strambach, S. (2001). Innovation processes and the role of knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS). In K. Koschatzky, M. Kulicke, & A. Zenker (Eds.), Innovation networks. Concepts and challenges in the european perspective (pp. 63–68). Heidelberg: Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulich, E. (1991). Arbeitspsychologie. Stuttgart: Schaeffer/Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieille, J. (2012). ISA-95/B2MML Tutorial: Integration practice from use cases to xml messages. In ISA Automation Conference, Doha (Qatar), 9 & 10 December 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilpola, I., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., & Salmimaa, T. (2006). Applying contextual design to ERP system implementation, CHI ‘06 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 147–152). Montreal: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel-Heuser, B., & Feiz-Marzoughi, B. (2013). Datenkopplung mittels UML-Modellen: Engineering- und IT-Systeme für Industrie 4.0 vernetzen, Automatisierungstechnische. Praxis, 55(12), 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel-Heuser, B., Kegel, G., Bender, K., & Wucherer, K. (2009). Global information architecture for industrial automation. Automatisierungstechnische Praxis, 51(1), 108–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walke, T., et al. (2013). Case Study @ Swisscom (Schweiz) AG: iPhone 5 Self-Service Order App and Process-Workflows. In H. Fischer & J. Schneeberger (Eds.), S-BPM ONE—2013, CCIS 360 (pp. 264–273). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weske, M. (2012). Business process management. Concepts, languages, architectures (2nd ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worley, C. G., & Lawler, E. E. (2010). Agility and organization design: A diagnostic framework. Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 194–204.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J. (2009). Information technology, E-learning and organizational learning. In Proceedings IEEE International Conference on E-Business and Information System Security. doi:10.1109/EBISS.2009.5138004.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Information Systems – Communications Engineering, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria

    Matthias Neubauer & Christian Stary

  2. Metsonic GmbH, Pfaffenhofen, Germany

    Udo Kannengiesser & Richard Heininger

  3. ByElement, Schindellegi, Switzerland

    Alexandra Totter & David Bonaldi

Authors
  1. Matthias Neubauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Stary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Udo Kannengiesser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Richard Heininger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alexandra Totter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. David Bonaldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Neubauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Linz, Austria

    Matthias Neubauer

  2. Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Linz, Austria

    Christian Stary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the work’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if such material is not included in the work’s Creative Commons license and the respective action is not permitted by statutory regulation, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to duplicate, adapt or reproduce the material.

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neubauer, M., Stary, C., Kannengiesser, U., Heininger, R., Totter, A., Bonaldi, D. (2017). S-BPM’s Industrial Capabilities. In: Neubauer, M., Stary, C. (eds) S-BPM in the Production Industry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48466-2_3

Download citation

  • .RIS
  • .ENW
  • .BIB
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48466-2_3

  • Published: 16 December 2016

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48465-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48466-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.