Modeling Organizational Capabilities on a Strategic Level

  • Janis Stirna
  • Jelena Zdravkovic
  • Martin Henkel
  • Pericles Loucopoulos
  • Christina Stratigaki
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 267)

Abstract

The notion of capability has emerged in Information System engineering as the means to support development of context dependent organizational solutions and supporting IT applications. To this end the Capability Driven Development (CDD) approach has been proposed. CDD currently focuses on designing and running applications that need to be adjusted according to changes in context, which can be seen as capability support on an operational level. This paper proposes a method component of CDD for strategic capability modeling in order to support business planning. The proposed component is to be used to analyze the organization’s capabilities on a strategic level, including aspects of collaboration with other enterprises. Its application in four companies is outlined and one application of capability design for the industrial symbiosis platform presented in detail.

Keywords

Enterprise modeling Capability modeling Strategic planning 

References

  1. 1.
    EU FP7 CaaS Project. Capability as a Service for digital enterprises, proj. no. 611351. http://caas-project.eu/
  2. 2.
    Ulrich, W., Rosen, M.: The business capability map: building a foundation for business/it alignment. Cutter Consortium for Business and Enterprise Architecture (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    OPENGROUP TOGAF - enterprise architecture methodology, version 9.1 (2012). http://www.opengroup.org/togaf/
  4. 4.
    UK Ministry of Defence: NATO Architecture Framework v4.0 Documentation (2013). http://nafdocs.org/modem
  5. 5.
    Giannoulis, C., Zikra, I., Bergholtz, M., Zdravkovic, J., Stirna, J., Johannesson, P.: A comparative analysis of enterprise modeling approaches for modeling business strategy. In: PoEM Short Papers 2013, pp. 193–204 (2013). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1023/paper19.pdf
  6. 6.
    Niehaves, B., Stirna, J.: Participative enterprise modelling for balanced scorecard implementation. In: ECIS 2006, pp. 286–298 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bērziša, S., Bravos, G., Gonzalez, T., Czubayko, U., España, S., Grabis, J., Henkel, M., Jokste, L., Kampars, J., Koc, H., Kuhr, J., Llorca, C., Loucopoulos, P., Juanes Pascual, R., Sandkuhl, K., Simic, H., Stirna, J., Zdravkovic, J.: Deliverable D1.4: REQUIREMENTS specification for CDD, CaaS – Capability as a Service for Digital Enterprises, FP7 proj. 611351. Riga Technical University (2014). http://caas-project.eu/deliverables/
  9. 9.
    OMG Business Architecture Special Interest Group&Guild. “What Is Business Architecture?”. http://bawg.omg.org/, http://www.businessarchitectureguild.org/
  10. 10.
    OMG: Value Delivery Metamodel, v. 1.0 (2013). http://www.omg.org/spec/VDML/1.0/
  11. 11.
    Department of Defense: DoD Architecture Framework Version 2.0, 28 May 2009. http://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/DODAF/DoDAF_v2-02_web.pdf
  12. 12.
    Bērziša, S., España, S., Grabis, J., Henkel, M., Jokste, L., Kampars, J., Koç, H., Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Valverde, F., Zdravkovic, J.: Deliverable 5.2: The Initial Version of Capability Driven Development Methodology, FP7 proj. 611351 CaaS – Capability as a Service in digital enterprises. Stockholm University (2015). DOI:10.13140/RG.2.1.2399.4965
  13. 13.
    Bērziša, S., Bravos, G., Gonzalez, T., Czubayko, U., España, S., Grabis, J., Henkel, M., Jokste, L., Kampars, J., Koç, H., Kuhr, J., Llorca, C., Loucopoulos, P., Juanes, R., Pastor, O., Sandkuhl, K., Simic, H., Stirna, J., Valverde, F., Zdravkovic, J.: Capability driven development: an approach to designing digital enterprises. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 57(1), 15–25 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loucopoulos, P., Stratigaki, C., Henkel, M., Stirna, J., Zorgios, Y., Migiakis, A.: Deliverable 3.2: CaaS method extension: Capability Modelling for Collaborative Development of Capability Delivery Applications, FP7 proj. 611351 CaaS – Capability as a Service in digital enterprises. CLMS Ltd., UK ( (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yilmaz, N., Stirna, J.: Factors influencing productization of enterprise modeling: a qualitative inquiry into the scandinavian strand of methods and tools. In: Ralyté, J., España, S., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) PoEM 2015. LNBIP, vol. 235, pp. 193–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25897-3_13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simula, H., Lethtimäki, T., Salo, J.: Re-thinking the product: from innovative technology to productized offering. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Society for Professional Innovation Management Conference, Tours, France (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janis Stirna
    • 1
  • Jelena Zdravkovic
    • 1
  • Martin Henkel
    • 1
  • Pericles Loucopoulos
    • 2
  • Christina Stratigaki
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Systems SciencesStockholm UniversityKistaSweden
  2. 2.CLMS LtdLondonUK

Personalised recommendations