Advertisement

An Artifact-Based Framework for Business-IT Misalignment Symptom Detection

  • Dóra ŐriEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 267)

Abstract

Enterprise architecture-based approaches give an in-depth analytic potential for alignment and misalignment assessment. The ability to incorporate these analytic potentials is an ongoing concern in the state-of-the-art strategic alignment literature. This paper proposes a framework for EA artifact-based misalignment symptom detection. The framework aims to perform a systematic, EA-based analysis of mismatches between the business and IT dimensions of the traditional Strategic Alignment Model (SAM). By operating the framework, containing EA-artifacts and suitable EA analysis types are connected to typical misalignment symptoms along the traditional alignment perspectives. The operation of the framework is illustrated with a case study about a fleet management project at a road management authority.

Keywords

Strategic alignment perspectives Misalignment symptoms EA artifacts Enterprise architecture analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Aier, S., Winter, R.: Virtual decoupling for IT/Business alignment – conceptual foundations, architecture design and implementation example. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2009(2), 150–163 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baets, W.: Aligning information systems with business strategy. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 1(4), 205–213 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buckl, S., Matthes, F., Schweda, C.M.: Classifying Enterprise Architecture Analysis Approaches. In: Sinderen, M., Chapurlat, V. (eds.) IWEI 2015. LNBIP, vol. 213, pp. 66–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-04750-3_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buckl, S., Buschle, M., Johnson, P., Matthes, F., Schweda, C.M.: A meta-language for enterprise architecture analysis. In: Schmidt, R., Guédria, W., Bider, I., Guerreiro, S. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD 2016. LNBIP, vol. 248, pp. 511–525. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21759-3_37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buschle, M., Ullberg, J., Franke, U., Lagerström, R., Sommestad, T.: A tool for enterprise architecture analysis using the PRM formalism. In: Soffer, P., Proper, E. (eds.) CAiSE Forum 2010. LNBIP, vol. 72, pp. 108–121. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-17722-4_8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carvalho, G., Sousa, P.: Business and information systems MisAlignment model (BISMAM): an holistic model leveraged on misalignment and medical sciences approaches. In: Johannesson, P., Gordijn, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Business/IT Alignment and Interoperability (BUSITAL 2008). CEUR, vol. 336, pp. 104–119. CEUR-WS, Aachen (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Castellanos, C., Correal, D.: KALCAS: a framework for semi-automatic alignment of data and business processes architectures. In: Pokorný, J., Ivanović, M., Thalheim, B., Šaloun, P. (eds.) ADBIS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9809, pp. 111–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33074-2_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chan, Y.E., Reich, B.H.: IT alignment: what have we learned? J. Inf. Technol. 22(2007), 297–315 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clark, T., Barn, B.S., Oussena, S.: A method for enterprise architecture alignment. In: Harmsen, F., Proper, H.A. (eds.) PRET 2013. LNBIP, vol. 151, pp. 48–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31134-5_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coleman, P., Papp, R.: Strategic alignment: analysis of perspectives. In: Murray, M., Weistroffer, H.R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2006 Southern Association for Information Systems Conference, pp. 242–250. MPublishing, Michigan (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst. J. 32(1), 4–16 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work. Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Niemann, K.D.: From Enterprise Architecture to IT Governance. Elements of Effective IT Management. Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlag, Wiesbaden (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Noran, O.: A decision support framework for collaborative networks. Int. J. Prod. Res. 47(17), 4813–4832 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pereira, C.M., Sousa, P.: Enterprise architecture: business and IT alignment. In: ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1344–1345. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saat, J., Franke, U., Lagerström, R., Ekstedt, M.: Enterprise architecture meta models for IT/Business alignment situations. In: 14th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 14–23. IEEE Press, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scott Morton, M.S.: The Corporation of the 1990s: Information Technology and Organizational Transformation. Oxford Press, London (1991)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sousa, P., Pereira, C.M., Marques, J.A.: Enterprise architecture alignment heuristics. Microsoft Architects J. 4, 34–39 (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Strong, D.M., Volkoff, O.: Understanding organization-enterprise system fit: a path to theorizing the information technology artifact. MIS Q. 34(4), 731–756 (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF). http://theopengroup.org/
  22. 22.
    Ullberg, J., Franke, U., Buschle, M., Johnson, P.: A tool for interoperability analysis of enterprise architecture models using Pi-OCL. In: Popplewell, K., Harding, J., Poler, R., Chalmeta, R. (eds.) Enterprise Interoperability IV. Making the Internet of the Future for the Future of Enterprises, pp. 81–90. Springer, London (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wagter, R., Proper, H.A., Witte, D.: A practice-based framework for enterprise coherence. In: Harmsen, F., Proper, H.A. (eds.) PRET 2013. LNBIP, vol. 151, pp. 77–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31134-5_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wegmann, A., Regev, G., Rychkova, I., Lam-Son Le, de la Cruz, J.D., Julia, P.: Business and IT alignment with SEAM for enterprise architecture. In: 11th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 111–121. IEEE Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zachman, J.A.: A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst. J. 26(3), 276–292 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsCorvinus University of BudapestBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations