An Active Analysis and Crowd Sourced Approach to Social Training

  • Dan Feng
  • Elin Carstensdottir
  • Sharon Marie Carnicke
  • Magy Seif El-Nasr
  • Stacy Marsella
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10045)

Abstract

Interactive narrative (IN) has increasingly been used for social skill training. However, extensive content creation is needed to provide learners with flexibility to replay scenarios with sufficient variety to achieve proficiency. Such flexibility requires considerable content creation appropriate for social skills training. The goal of our work is to address these issues through developing a generative narrative approach that re-conceptualizes social training IN as an improvisation using Stanislavsky’s Active Analysis (AA), and utilizes AA to create a crowd sourcing content creation method. AA is a director guided rehearsal technique that promotes Theory of Mind skills critical to social interaction and decomposes a script into key events. In this paper, we discuss AA and the iterative crowd sourcing approach we developed to generate rich, coherent content that can be used to develop a generative model for interactive narrative.

Keywords

Intelligent narrative technologies Active analysis Theory of mind Crowd sourcing Social skills training 

References

  1. 1.
    Lok, B., Ferdig, R.E., Raij, A., Johnsen, K., Dickerson, R., Coutts, J., Stevens, A., Lind, D.S.: Applying virtual reality in medical communication education: current findings and potential teaching and learning benefits of immersive virtual patients. Virtual Reality 10(3–4), 185–195 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim, J.M., Hill, J., Durlach, P.J., Lane, H.C., Forbell, E., Core, M., Marsella, S., Pynadath, D., Hart, J.: BiLAT: a game-based environment for practicing negotiation in a cultural context. IJAIED 19(3), 289–308 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zoll, C., Enz, S., Schaub, H., Aylett, R., Paiva, A.: Fighting bullying with the help of autonomous agents in a virtual school environment. In: 7th International Conference on Cognitive Modelling (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Whiten, A.: Natural Theories of Mind: Evolution, Development and Simulation of Everyday Mindreading. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Artinger, F., Exadaktylos, F., Koppel, H., Sääksvuori, L.: In others’ shoes: do individual differences in empathy and theory of mind shape social preferences? PloS one 9(4), e92844 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Engel, D., Woolley, A.W., Jing, L.X., Chabris, C.F., Malone, T.W.: Reading the mind in the eyes or reading between the lines? theory of mind predicts collective intelligence equally well online and face-to-face. PloS one 9(12), e115212 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis, M.H.: Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 44(1), 113 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Converse, S.: Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In: Individual and Group Decision Making: Current (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin, S., Keysar, B., Epley, N.: Reflexively mindblind: using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 46(3), 551–556 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldstein, T.R., Wu, K., Winner, E.: Actors are skilled in theory of mind but not empathy. Imagination Cogn. Person. 29(2), 115–133 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carnicke, S.M.: Stanislavsky in Focus: An Acting Master for the Twenty-First Century. Taylor & Francis, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, B., Lee-Urban, S., Appling, D.S., Riedl, M.O.: Crowdsourcing narrative intelligence. Adv. Cogn. Syst. 2, 25–42 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Orkin, J., Roy, D.K.: Understanding speech in interactive narratives with crowd sourced data. In: Proceedings of the 8th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligent and Interactive Digital Entertainment. The AAAI Press (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Swartout, W., et al.: Toward the holodeck: integrating graphics, sound, character and story. In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 409–416. ACM (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li, B., Appling, D.S., Lee-Urban, S., Riedl, M.O.: Learning sociocultural knowledge via crowdsourced examples. In: Proceedings of the 4th AAAI Workshop on Human Computation (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guzdial, M., Harrison, B., Li, B., Riedl, M.O.: Crowdsourcing open interactive narrative. In: The 10th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Swanson, R., Gordon, A.S.: Say anything: a massively collaborative open domain story writing companion. In: Spierling, U., Szilas, N. (eds.) ICIDS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5334, pp. 32–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89454-4_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li, B., Lee-Urban, S., Johnston, G., Riedl, M.: Story generation with crowdsourced plot graphs. In: Proceedings of the 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Orkin, J., Roy, D.: The restaurant game: learning social behavior and language from thousands of players online. J. Game Dev. 3(1), 39–60 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McCoy, J., Treanor, M., Samuel, B., Reed, A.A., Mateas, M., Wardrip-Fruin, N.: Prom week: designing past the game/story dilemma. In: FDG, pp. 94–101 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Elson, D.: Modeling narrative discourse. Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rahimtoroghi, E., Corcoran, T., Swanson, R., Walker, M.A., Sagae, K., Gordon, A.: Minimal narrative annotation schemes and their applications. In: 7th Intelligent Narrative Technologies Workshop (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sina, S., Rosenfeld, A., Kraus, S.: Generating content for scenario-based serious-games using crowdsourcing. In: AAAI, pp. 522–529 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Si, M., Marsella, S.C., Pynadath, D.V.: Thespian: an architecture for interactive pedagogical drama. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on AIED, pp. 595–602 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Feng
    • 1
  • Elin Carstensdottir
    • 1
  • Sharon Marie Carnicke
    • 2
  • Magy Seif El-Nasr
    • 1
  • Stacy Marsella
    • 1
  1. 1.Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations