A New Approach to Investigating Coke Reactivity

  • Brian J Monaghan
  • Raymond J Longbottom
  • Mark Reid
  • Oluwatosin A Aladejebi
  • Apsara S Jayasekara
  • Marc in het Panhuis

Abstract

The coke analogue is a new research tool that has been developed to quantify and characterize the effect minerals in coke have on coke reactivity. The analogue material is made from a number of different carbon or carbon containing materials and minerals to in part replicate real industrial coke’s reactivity behavior. Elucidation of the effects of minerals on coke reactivity has proved difficult due to the complex and heterogeneous nature of industrial coke and the potential non-additive effects of minerals on coke reactivity. The coke analogue addresses this complexity and heterogeneity through control of its mineralogy, mineral size and mineral dispersion through the analogue, porosity and carbon structures. Initial studies using the analogue were focused on coke dissolution kinetics in liquid iron but recent work has focused in characterization of its porosity, carbon structure and rate of reaction.

Keywords

Coke Coke Reactivity Coke minerals Raman 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. K. Biswas: Principles of Blast Furnace Ironmaking, (Brisbane, Australia: Cootha Publishing House, 1981).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Bennet, A Reifenstein, G. O’Brien and B. Jenkins, “Coke Reactivity and Characterisation” (Report C12057, ACARP, 2008).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ASTM D5341 - 99(2010) Standard Test Method for Measuring Coke Reactivity Index (CRI) and Coke Strength After Reaction (CSR).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO 18894:2006 Coke — Determination of coke reactivity index (CRI) and coke strength after reaction (CSR).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. French, R. Sakurovs and M. Grigore, “Mineral Matter Reactions in Cokes”, (Report C14074, ACARP, 2009).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Grigore, R. Sakurovs, D. French and V. Sahajwalla, “Influence of Mineral Matter on Coke Reactivity with Carbon Dioxide”, ISIJ International, 46 (2006), 503–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B-C. Kim, S. Gupta, D. French, R. Sakurovs, and V. Sahajwalla, “Effect of Thermal Treatment on Coke Reactivity and Catalytic Iron Mineralogy”, Energy & Fuels, 23 (2009), 3694–3702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Sakurovs, D. French and M. Grigore, “Quantification of Mineral Matter in Commercial Cokes and their Parent Coals”, Internationaljournal of Coal Geology, 7 (2007), 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W.W. Gill, N.A. Brown, C.D.A. Coin, and M.R. Mahoney, “Influence of Ash on the Weakening of Coke”, (Paper presented at the 44th ISS-AIME Ironmaking Conference, 1985), pp. 233–238.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W.H. Van Niekerk and R.J. Dippenaar, “The Influence of Potassium on the Reactivity and Strength of Coke, with Special Reference to the Role of Coke Ash”, J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall., 86 (1986), 25–29.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B.J. Monaghan, S.A. Nightingale and M. Chapman, “Carbon Transfer in the Lower Zone of a Blast Furnace”, Steel Research International, 81 (2010), 829–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.J. Longbottom, B.J Monaghan, M.W. Chapman, S.A. Nightingale, J.G. Mathieson, and R.J. Nightingale, “Techniques in the Study of Carbon Transfer in Ironmaking”, Steel Research International, 82 (2011), 505–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Longbottom, B.J. Monaghan, O. Scholes, and M.R. Mahoney, “Development of a Metallurgical Coke Analogue to Investigate the Effects of Coke Mineralogy on Coke Reactivity”,(Paper presented at Scanmet IV, 4th International Conference on Process Development in Iron and Steelmaking, Luleå, Sweden, 2012), 147–156.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M.H. Reid, M.R. Mahoney and B J. Monaghan, A Coke Analogue for the Study of the Effects of Minerals on Coke Reactivity, ISIJ International, in print.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.W. Chapman, “Insoluble Oxide Product Formation and its Effect on Coke Dissolution in Liquid Iron”, (Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wollongong, 2009), 63–99.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Loison, P. Foch, and A. Boyer, Coke Quality and Production. (London, UK: Butterworth & Co Press. 1989), 129.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Kawakami, H. Kanba, K. Sato, T. Takenda, S. Gupta, R. Chandratilleke, and V. Sahajwalla, “Characterisation of Thermal Annealing Effects on the Evolution of Coke Structure Using Raman Spectroscopy and X-Ray Diffraction,” ISIJ International, 46, (2006), 1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian J Monaghan
    • 1
  • Raymond J Longbottom
    • 1
  • Mark Reid
    • 1
  • Oluwatosin A Aladejebi
    • 1
  • Apsara S Jayasekara
    • 1
  • Marc in het Panhuis
    • 2
  1. 1.Engineering Materials Institute and School of Mechanical Materials and MechatronicsUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  2. 2.Soft Materials Group, School of Chemistry and Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, ARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, AIIM FacilityUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations