Advertisement

Technoeconomic Assessment of the Carbothermic Reduction Process for Aluminum Production

  • William Choate
  • John Green

Abstract

In pursuit of the aluminum industry Vision and Roadmap goals, the Department of Energy has partially supported a consortium of Alcoa and Elkem in the development of the Aluminum Carbothermic Technology — Advanced Reduction Process (ACT-ARP), which promises significant energy and emission reductions. This report explores the progress of the ACT-ARP as a potential replacement for the Hall-Hèroult process in the context of several evolving Hall-Hèroult development scenarios. Considerable progress has been made and demonstrated, including new furnace wall designs integral to successful operation of Stage 1 reactor, operational characteristics of vapor recovery reactor and aluminum de-carbonization reactor, as well as significant modeling and simulation. Despite these considerable accomplishments, there are still formidable technical and economic challenges to overcome before the ACT-ARP can replace the conventional Hall-Hèroult process, such as slag and scale formation, metal and carbon quality issues, mini-mill operation, etc. All these and other issues will be discussed.

Keywords

Carbothermic Hall-Hèroult Mini-mill Wetted Cathode Inert Anode 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    John A. S. Green, Technoeconomic Assessment of the Carbothermic Reduction Process for Aluminum Production: Established versus Future Technologies, Final Report to Department of Energy, Industrial Technologies Program under purchase order # 4000031177, May 2005. http://www.eere.energy.gov/industry/aluminumGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aluminum statistical review for 2004, The Aluminum Association, Inc., Suite 600, 1525 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22209.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aluminum Industry Technology Roadmap, The Aluminum Association, Inc., Suite 600, 1525 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22209.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kai Johansen, Jan A. Aune, Marshall Bruno, and Anders Schei, Elkem ASA Research, Kristiansund, Norway and Alcoa Technical Center, Pittsburgh, USA Carbothermic Aluminum. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vianey Garcia-Osorio, Tor Linstad, B. Erik Ydstie, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Carnie Mellon University, PA 15213 and SINTEF Materials Technology, Trondheim, Norway. Dynamic Model for a Vapor Recovery in Carbothermic Aluminum Process Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    “Aluminum Carbothermic Technology”, presentation by Marshall Bruno, Alcoa, at 2004 Annual Project Review, Oct 19th, 2004Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    William T. Choate and John A.S. Green, U.S. Energy Requirements for Aluminum Production: Historical Perspective, Theoretical Limits and New Opportunities” Feb. 2003 Report to Department of Energy, Industrial Technologies Program http://www.eere.energy.gov/industry/aluminum/analysis.htmlGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    International Aluminium Institute (IAI) website is www.world-aluminium, see “Sustainability” section.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.D. Brown, M.P. Taylor, G.J. Hardie, and R.W. Shaw, TiB2Coated Aluminum Reduction Cells, Paper presented by Comalco Aluminum Ltd., at the Queenstown Aluminum Smelting Conf., 26th Nov. 1998Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu Fengqin, Dir. Of Aluminum Electrolysis and Carbon Development, Zhengzhou Research Institute, CHALCO, private communication to J. Green, Feb. 2005.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thomas Leeuwen, An Aluminum Revolution, Desk Notes, Credit Suisse First Boston Corp., 22nd June, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tony Kjar, Private Communication to J. Green, April 2002.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aluminum Carbothermic Technology, Final Technical Progress Report under Agreement No. DE-FC36–00ID13900 submitted to Department of Energy, Industrial Technologies Program by Alcoa, April, 2005. http://www.eere.energy.gov/industry/aluminum
  14. 14.
    William T. Choate, Majeed Aziz, Rennie Friedman, Will New Technologies Sustain the U.S. Primary Aluminum Industry?” BCS, Inc., Columbia MD, TMS presentation, Feb. 2005Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    “Sustainability of the European Aluminum Industry”, published by EAA, March 2005, http://www.eaa.net/.
  16. 16.
    See Appendix 1 in Reference 1 for details of assumptions and analysis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Choate
    • 1
  • John Green
    • 2
  1. 1.BCS Inc.ColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.JASG ConsultingEllicott CityUSA

Personalised recommendations