Mechanical Properties of Steel Encapsulated Metal Matrix Composites
This research evaluates a coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) mismatch induced residual compressive stress approach as a means of improving the ductility of metal matrix composites (MMCs). MMCs are frequently incorporated into advanced material systems due to their tailorable material properties. However, they often have insufficient strength and ductility for many structural applications. By combining MMCs with high strength steels in a hybridized, macro composite materials system that exploits the CTE mismatch, materials systems with improved strength, damage tolerance, and structural efficiency can be obtained. Macro hybridized systems consisting of steel encapsulated light metal MMCs were produced with the goal of creating a system which takes advantage of the high strength, modulus, and damage tolerance of steels and high specific stiffness and low density of MMCs while mitigating the high density of steels and the poor ductility of MMCs. Aluminum and magnesium based particulate reinforced MMCs combine many of the desirable characteristic of metals and ceramics, particularly the unique ability to tailor their CTE. This work aims to compare the performance of macro hybridized material systems consisting of aluminum or magnesium MMCs reinforced with Al2O3, SiC, or B4C particles and encapsulated by A36 steel, 304 stainless steel, or cold worked Nitronic® 50 stainless steels.
KeywordsEncapsulation Metal Matrix Composite Residual Stress
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.V. Kumar GB, Rao CSP, Selvaraj N, Bhagyashekar MS. “Studies on Al6061-SiC and Al 7075-Al2O3 metal matrix composites. J Miner Mater Charact Eng 2010;99(1):43–55.Google Scholar
- 8.A.L. Grow, S. Patankar, T. Osman, R.W. Margevicius, and J.J. Lewandowski: Presented at TMS-AIME Meeting, San Diego, CA, March 1–4, 1992.Google Scholar
- 9.S. Patankar, R.W. Margevicius, and J.J. Lewandowski: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, unpublished research, 1992.Google Scholar
- 13.F. Zok, J.D. Embury, M.F. Ashby, and O. Richmond: 9th Risø Int. Symp. on Metallurgy and Materials Science, S.I. Anderson, H. Lilholt, and O.B. Pederson, eds., Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark, 1989, pp. 517–27.Google Scholar
- 21.P. G. Karandikar et al., “Net shape Al/B4C metal matrix composites (MMCs) for high specific stiffness and neutron absorption applications,” TMS 2013 Annual Meeting Supplemental Proceedings, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, (2013), 683–689.Google Scholar
- 22.M. Aghajanian, et al., “Processing of Hybrid structures consisting of Al-based metal matrix composites (MMCs) with metallic reinforcement of steel or titanium”, TMS2013 Annual Meeting Supplemental Proceedings, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, (2013), 629–638.Google Scholar
- 23.B. Givens, et al., “Effect of particle loading on the properties of Al/SiC metal matrix composites,” in Aluminum Alloys: Fabrication, Characterization and Applications II, Yin et al. editors, TMS, Warrendale, PA (2009) 197–202.Google Scholar
- 24.P. Karandikar et al. “Metal Encapsulated MMC Macrocomposites” Materials Science & Technology 2014 Conference Proceedings.Google Scholar