Microstructural Characterization of Fatigue Damage of CFRP in the Very High Cycle Fatigue Regime

  • Daniel Backe
  • Frank Balle
  • Dietmar Eifler


Structural components in aircrafts made of carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) are often subjected to 108 and more loading cycles during their time in service. To obtain a comprehensive knowledge about the fatigue behavior of CFRP in the very high cycle fatigue (VHCF) regime and the corresponding failure mechanisms at loading cycles higher than 108, a new Ultrasonic Testing Facility for cyclic 3-point bending at 20 kHz has been developed. The system enables VHCF experiments up to 109 loading cycles in twelve days without unacceptable heating of the specimens. The investigated material is an aircraft qualified carbon fiber fabric reinforced polyphenylensulfide (CF-PPS). Constant load amplitude tests have been realized to characterize the fatigue behavior. Detailed light optical and SEM investigations have been performed in defined fatigue states and after failure or finally after reaching 109 cycles. Based on these results the failure mechanisms of CF-PPS in the VHCF regime were documented and analyzed.


CFRP VHCF ultrasonic fatigue cyclic 3-point bending failure mechanisms of CF-PPS 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    C. Bathias, P. C. Paris, Gigacycle Fatigue in Mechanical Practice (CRC Decker, New York, 2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Mughrabi, “On “multi-stage” fatigue life diagrams and the life-controlling mechanisms in ultrahigh-cycle fatigue,” Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 25 (2001), 755–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. A. Abeles Couillard, P. Schwartz, “Bending fatigue of carbon-fiber-reinforced epoxy composites strands,” Composites Science and Technology, 57 (1997), 229 – 235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Hosoi et al., “Interaction between transverse cracks and edge delamination considering free-edge effects in composites laminates,” Proc. of 16th International conference on composite materials, Kyoto, 2007Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Hosoi et al., “High-cycle fatigue characteristics of quasi-isotropic CFRP laminates over 108 cycles (Initiation and propagation of delamination considering interaction with transverse cracks),” Internationaljournal of Fatigue, 32 (2010), 29 – 36Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Hosoi et al., “Quantitative evaluation of fatigue damage growth in CFRP laminates that changes due to applied stress level,” Internationaljournal of Fatigue, 33 (2011), 781 – 787Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. W. Ehrenstein, Polymeric Materials (Carl Hanser, Munich, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Rotheiser, Joining of Plastics (Carl Hanser, Munich, 2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Stanzl, “A new experimental method for measuring life time and crack growth of materials under multi-stage and random loadings,” Ultrasonics, 19 (1981), 269 – 272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Bathias, “Piezoelectric fatigue testing machines and devices,” International Journal of Fatigue, 28 (2006), 1438 – 1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. E. Stanzl-Tschegg, “Ultrasonic Fatigue. Encyclopedia of Materials,” Science and Technology, 2001, 9444–9449Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Koster, G. Wagner, D. Eifler, “New measuring methods for the fatigue assessment of metals in the VHCF regime,” Proc. of Fourth International Conference on Very High Cycle Fatigue (VHCF4), 2007, 137–142Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Heinz, F. Balle, G. Wagner, D. Eitler, “Innovative Ultrasonic Testing Facility for Fatigue Experiments in the VHCF Regime,” Materials Testing, 54 (2012), 750 – 755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Heinz, G. Wagner, D. Eifler, “Innovative piezoelectric testing facility for fatigue experiments in the VHCF regime,” Proc. of Fifth International Conference on Very High Cycle Fatigue (VHCF5), 2011, 479–484Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. W. Ehrenstein, G. Riedel and P. Trawiel, Thermal Analysis of Plastics (Munich, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    U. Rabe et al., “Nonlinear Ultrasonic Testing of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastics in the Very High Cycle Fatigue Regime,” Proc. of Meetings on Acoustics (POMA), 16 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Daggumati, et al., Fatigue and post-fatigue stress-strain analysis of a 5-harness satin weave carbon fibre reinforced composite. Composites Science and Technology, 74 (2013), 20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Backe
    • 1
  • Frank Balle
    • 1
  • Dietmar Eifler
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of KaiserslauternKaiserslauternGermany

Personalised recommendations