Advertisement

Finite Element Analysis of Quantitative Percussion Diagnostics for Evaluating the Strength of Bonds Between Composite Laminates

  • Scott Poveromo
  • Doug Malcolm
  • James Earthman

Abstract

Conventional nondestructive (NDT) techniques used to detect defects in composites are not able to determine intact bond integrity within a composite structure and are costly to use on large and complex shaped surfaces. To overcome current NDT limitations, a new technology was adopted based on quantitative percussion diagnostics (QPD) to better quantify bond quality in fiber reinforced composite materials. Results indicate that this technology is capable of detecting weak (‘kiss’) bonds between flat composite laminates. Specifically, the local value of the probe force determined from quantitative percussion testing was predicted to be significantly lower for a laminate that contained a ‘kiss’ bond compared to that for a well-bonded sample, which is in agreement with experimental findings. Experimental results were compared to a finite element analysis (FEA) using MSC PATRAN/NASTRAN to understand the visco-elastic behavior of the laminates during percussion testing. The dynamic FEA models were used to directly predict changes in the probe force, as well as effective stress distributions across the bonded panels as a function of time.

Keywords

composites kiss bonds nondestructive testing finite element analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barnes TA, Pashby IR. “Joining techniques for aluminium spaceframes used in automobiles Part II-adhesive bonding and mechanical fasteners.” J Mater Process Technol 99 (2000): 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang S, Lan G, and Gibson RF. “Nondestructive detection of weak joints in adhesively bonded composite structures.” Compos Struct 51 (2001): 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Piehl MJ, et al. “Efficient Certification of Bonded Primary Structure.” SAMPE Conference Proceedings: Education & Green Sky — Materials Technology for a Better World. Long Beach, CA. May 6–9, 2013. Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Richard Bossi, et al. “Laser Bond Testing.” Materials Evaluation (2009): 819–827.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wingfield JRJ. “Treatment of composite surfaces for adhesive bonding.” Int J. Adhes Adhes 13 (1993): 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nagy PB. “Ultrasonic detection of kissing bonds at adhesive interfaces.” J. Adhes Sci. Technol 5 (1991): 619–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cawley P and Adams RD. “The mechanics of the coin-tap method of non-destructive testing.” Journal of Sound And Vibration 122 (1988): 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Poveromo, Scott and Earthman, James. “Development of Percussion Diagnostics in Evaluating ‘Kiss’ Bonds Between Composite Laminates.” SAMPE Conference Proceedings: Education & Green Sky — Materials Technology for a Better World. Long Beach, CA. May 6–9, 2013. Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Poveromo, Scott and Earthman, James. “Development of Percussion Diagnostics in Evaluating ‘Kiss’ Bonds Between Composite Laminates.” TMS Conference Proceedings: Advanced Composites for Aerospace, Marine, and Land Applications. Edited by Tomoko Sano, T.S. Srivatsan and Michael W. Peretti. San Diego, CA February 16th–20th, 2014. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poveromo, Scott and Earthman, James. “Analysis of Kiss Bonds Between Composite Laminates.” Journal of Materials 66 (2014): 970–978.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stanley BD, Bustemante L and Earthman JC. “Novel instrumentation for rapid assessment of internal damage in composite materials.” Nondestructive Evaluation and Materials Properties III (1997): 97–100.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    United States Patent #6120466. “System and method for quantitative measurements of energy damping capacity.” September 19th, 2000.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shiloh K et al. “Aging Characterization of adhesives and bonded joints by non-destructive damping measurements.” J Intel Mat Syst. Str 10 (1999): 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Srivatsan TS et al. “Electromagnetic measurement of damping capacity to detect damage in adhesively bonded material.” Materials Evaluation 47 (1989): 564–569.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott Poveromo
    • 1
  • Doug Malcolm
    • 2
  • James Earthman
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Chemical Engineering and Materials ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA
  2. 2.MSC Software CorporationNewport BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations