Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainability Metrics for Efficient and Innovative Residential Building Wall Systems

  • Chapter
Engineering Solutions for Sustainability

  • 740 Accesses

Abstract

With sustainability becoming more recognized and desirable by homeowners, designers need to have better metrics to make solutions possible. One of the most effective building components that can be optimized for sustainability purposes is the wall system. To select the proper wall system that is efficient and at times innovative, there is a need to better understand how metrics relate to different wall configurations and materials. This paper expands upon prior works to identify the key sustainability metrics for residential wall systems that designers, builders and homeowners can use to assess and select the best wall system. The metrics highlighted include: embodied energy, material-specific, and impact on the environment. These metrics will be examined for wall systems made up of: Insulated Concrete Form, Wood-Frame, Steel Stud, Structural Insulated Panel, Concrete Masonry Unit, Autoclaved Aerated Concrete, and Precast Concrete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S.M. Baharetha, A.A. Al-Hammad, and H.M. Alshuwaikhat, “Towards a Unified Set of Sustainable Building Materials Criteria,” ICSDEC, (2012), 732–740.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Department of Energy, “U.S. Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Review,” U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hermreck, C., and W. K. Chong, “Embodied Energy of CDW Recycling and Technical Metabolism Due to Regional Differences and Building Designs.” 2009 Construction Research Congress, (2009), 273–281.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Milani, “Building Materials in a Green Economy: Community-based Strategies for Dematerialization,” University of Toronto, (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). “Buildings and their Impact on the Environment: A Statistical Summary.” (2009). Available at http://www.epa.gov /greenbuilding/pubs/gbstats.pdf.Accessed 03/20/2012.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F.R. Lopez, and G.F. Sanchez, “Challenges for Sustainability Assessment by Indicators.” Leadership and Management in Engineering, October (2011), 321–325.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Mulki and A. Hinge, “Green Investment Horizons: Effects of Policy on the Market for Building Energy Efficiency Technologies,” World Resources Institute, November (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Carpenter and J. Zhou, “Life Cycle Analysis of a St. Louis Flat Roof Residential Retrofit for Improved Energy Efficiency,” ICSDEC, (2012), 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F.H. Halicioglu, D. Arditi, and S. Gunhan, “Towards Advanced Solutions for Achieving Sustainability Goals in Buildings: Lessons Learned from Case Studies,” ICSDEC, (2012), 835–843.

    Google Scholar 

  10. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press, (1987). 43 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  11. U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), “Building a greener future. Special advertising section in partnership with Fortune.” Fortune, March, 20, (2006), 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  12. U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), “Leadership in energy and environmental design (LEED).” http://www.usgbc.org/ [accessed 03/16/2012].

    Google Scholar 

  13. National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS), “High performance buildings,” NIBS, (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  14. U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE), “Federal energy management program (FEMP) — High performance Federal buildings.” http://femp.buildinggreen.com/ [accessed 03/16/2012].

    Google Scholar 

  15. U.S. General Services Administration (U.S. GSA), “Office of Federal high performance green buildings.” http://www.gsa.gov /portal/category/101107 [accessed 03/16/2012].

    Google Scholar 

  16. Whole Building Design Guide. (WBDG), “Federal high performance and sustainable buildings.” http://www.wbdg.org/references/fhpsb.php [accessed 03/16/2012].

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Stek, D. DeLong, T. McDonnell, and J. Rodriguez, “Life cycle assessment using ATHENA® impact estimator for buildings: A case study,” Structures Congress (2011) 483–494.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Haynes, “Embodied Energy Calculations within Life Cycle Analysis of Residential Buildings,” (2010), [Online], http://etool.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Embodied-Energy-Paper-Richard-Haynes.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. Klotz, and M. Horman, “Counterfactual Analysis of Sustainable Project Delivery Processes.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(5), (2010), 595–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. T. Graedel, and B. Allenby, Industrial Ecology and Sustainable Engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  21. B.V. Reddy and K.S. Jagadish, “Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies, Energy and Buildings,” 35, (2003), 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. P. Wu and S. P. Low, “Project Management and Green Buildings: Lessons from the Rating Systems.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 136(2), (2010), 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chong, W. K., S. Kumar, C. T. Haas, S. M. Beheiry, L. Coplen, and M. Oey. “Understanding and Interpreting Baseline Perceptions of Sustainability in Construction among Civil Engineers in the United States.” ASCE Journal of Management in Engineering, 25 (3), (2009), 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R. Cole, “Building environmental assessment methods: Clarifying intentions.” Building Research and Information, 27 (4/5), (1999), 230–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. G. Ding, “Developing a multi-criteria approach for the measurement of sustainable performance.” Building Research and Information, 33 (1), (2005), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J. San-Jose, R. Losada, J. Cuadrado, and I. Garrucho, “Approach to the quantification of the sustainable value in industrial buildings,” Building and Environment, 42 (11), (2007), 3916–3923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. R.C. Retzlaff, “Green Building Assessment Systems A Framework and Comparison for Planners,” Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(4), (2008), 505–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. K.Y. G. Kwok, C. Statz, B. Wade, K. Wai, and O. Chong, “Carbon Emission Modeling for Green Building: A Comprehensive Study of Calculations,”

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. Memari, R. Solnosky, J. Tufano, and M. Dillen, “Comparative Study on Multi-hazard Resistance and Embodied Energy of Different Residential Building Wall Systems,” J. Civil Eng. Architect. Res. 1(6), (2014), pp. 367–387

    Google Scholar 

  30. SWA. Residential Panels Benchmark Requirements, Steven Winter Associates (SWA), Prepared for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, office of Policy Development and Research, Washington, DC, (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  31. M.G. Salvadori and R.A. Heller, Structure in Architecture, Prentice-Hall, (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. L. Obiso, “Analysis of means and methods of construction improvement in single family housing in mid-Atlantic rural university towns.” M.Sc. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  33. J.J. Kim, and B. Rigdon, “Sustainable Architecture module: Qualities, use, and Examples of Sustainable Building Materials,” National Pollution Prevention Center for Higher Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  34. E. Hubbs, “If Walls Could Talk.” Nursing Homes/Long Term Care Management, 5(6), (2003), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  35. D.M. Kestner, J. Goupil, and E. Lorenz, “Sustainability guidelines for the structural engineer,” American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA, (2010), 1–315.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. D. E. Jacobs et al., “The prevalence of lead-based paint hazards in U.S. housing.” Environ. Health Perspect, 110(10), (2002), A599–A606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. ERC, “ERC web.” [Online], http://www.ercweb.com/resources/viewreg.aspx?id=7102.

  38. H. A. Denmark and H. L. Cromroy, “Featured creatures: House dust mites.” Publication No. EENY-59, (2007). [Online Jun. 30, 2013], http://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/urban/house_dust_mite.htmæ.

    Google Scholar 

  39. J. Krieger and D.L. Higgins, “Housing and health: Time again for public health action.” Am. J. Public Health, 92(5), (2002), 758–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. K. Yeatts et al. “A brief targeted review of susceptibility factors, environmental exposures, asthma incidence, and recommendations for future asthma incidence research.” Environ. Health Perspect., 114(4), (2006), 634–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Green Building Home Page (GHP), “Green Building,” [Online] http://www.ciwmb .ca.gov/GreenBuilding/. (accessed in 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  42. EPA. “History of RCRA.” [Online Jun. 21, 2013] http://www.epa.gov/wastes/laws-regs/rcrahistory.html.

    Google Scholar 

  43. P.J. Arsebault and P. Bates, “Designed, Sealed, Delivered — IAQ and the Building Enclosure” McGraw Hill Construction Continuing Education, (2013), [Online] http://continuingeducation .construction.com/article_print.php?C=1140&L=376

    Google Scholar 

  44. A.M. Memari, “Comparative study of multi-hazard performance of different wall systems used in single-family dwelling construction,” 6th Congress on Forensic Engineering, (2012), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  45. W. Werner, and J.G. Burns, “Quantification and optimization of structural embodied energy and carbon,” ASCE Structures Congress, (2012), 929–940.

    Google Scholar 

  46. S.L. Hsu, Life cycle assessment of materials and construction in commercial structures: Variability and limitations, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  47. C. Jayasinghe, “Embodied energy of alternative building materials and their impact on life cycle cost parameters,” ICSECM 201, (2011), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  48. C. Reardon, G. Milne, C. McGee, and P. Downton, “Your Home Technical Manual — Australia’s guide to environmentally sustainable homes,” 4th Edition (Reprinted with minor updates) (2010), [Online], http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/

    Google Scholar 

  49. P. Pierquet, J.L. Bowyer, and P. Huelman, “Thermal performance and embodied energy of cold climate wall systems,” Forest Products Journal, 48 (6) (1998) 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  50. T. Ariosto, and A.M. Memari, “Comparative study of energy efficiency of glazing systems for residential and commercial buildings,” AEI, (2013) 408–417.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Pennsylvania State University, 104 Engineering Unit A University Park, Pa, 16802, USA

    Ryan L. Solnosky & Ali M. Memari

Authors
  1. Ryan L. Solnosky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali M. Memari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Auburn University, USA

    Jeffrey W. Fergus

  2. Colorado School of Mines, USA

    Brajendra Mishra

  3. Virginia Tech, USA

    Emily Allyn Sarver

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Solnosky, R.L., Memari, A.M. (2015). Sustainability Metrics for Efficient and Innovative Residential Building Wall Systems. In: Fergus, J.W., Mishra, B., Anderson, D., Sarver, E.A., Neelameggham, N.R. (eds) Engineering Solutions for Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48138-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48138-8_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48613-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48138-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation