Skip to main content

Reliability-Based Casting Process Design Optimization

  • Chapter
Shape Casting: 5th International Symposium 2014

Abstract

Optimum casting designs are unreliable without consideration of the statistical and physical uncertainties in the casting process. In the present research, casting simulation is integrated with a general purpose reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) software tool previously developed at the University of Iowa. The RBDO methodology considers uncertainties in both the input variables as well as in the model itself. The output consists not only of a reliable optimum design but also of the knowledge of the confidence level in this design. An example is presented where the design of a riser is optimized while considering uncertainties in the fill level, riser diameter, and the riser pipe depth prediction. It is shown that the present reliability-based method provides a much different optimum design than a traditional deterministic approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Kor, X. Chen, Z. Sun, H. Hu, “Casting Design through Multi-Objective Optimization,” Proc. of the 18th IFAC World Congress 2011, (2011), 6481–6486.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.M. Liao, J.X. Zhou, L.L. Chen, X. Shen, and X.D. Gong, “Casting CAD/CAE Automatic Optimal Riser Design Technology,” Int. Journal of Cast Metals Research, 24 (2011), 247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Sutaria, D. Joshi, M. Jagdishwar and B. Ravi, “Automatic Optimization of Casting Feeders Using Feed-Paths Generated by VEM,” ASME 2011 Int. Mech. Eng. Cong. and Expo., Volume 3: Design and Manufacturing (2011), 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.S. Ransing, M.P. Sood, and W.K. Pao, “Computer Implementation of Heuvers’ Circle Method for Thermal Optimisation in Castings,” Int. Journal of Cast Metals Research, 18 (2005), 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. MAGMA Gießereitechnologie GmbH, MAGMAfrontier Module Manuals: Part One, Part Two and Reference, (Aachen Germany, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. Hahn and J.C. Sturm, “Autonomous Optimization of Casting Processes and Designs,” World Foundry Congress, Hangzhou, China October 16–20 (2010), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. Hahn and G. Hartmann, “Automatic Computerized Optimization in Die Casting Processes,” Casting Plant & Technology, No. 4 (2008), 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Tutum and J. Hattel, “State-of-the-Art Multi-Objective Optimisation of Manufacturing Processes Based on Thermo-Mechanical Simulations,” Chapter 3 in Multi-objective Evolutionary Optimisation for Product Design and Manufacturing, L. Wang et al. (eds.), (London England: Springer-Verlag, 2011), 71–133.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Finite Solutions Inc., OPTICast Training Course Workbook, Version 8.1.1 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Advanced Reasoning Technologies, AutoCAST Software User Manual and Case Studies, http://www.autocast.co.in, (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Ravi, “Casting Simulation and Optimisation: Benefits, Bottlenecks, and Best Practices,” Indian Foundry Journal, 38 (2008), 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Zhao, K.K. Choi, and I. Lee, “Metamodeling Method Using Dynamic Kriging for Design Optimization,” AIAA Journal, 49 (2011), 2034–2046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Song, K.K. Choi, and D. Lamb, “A Study on Improving Accuracy of Kriging Models by Using Correlation Model Selection and Penalized Log-Likelihood Function,” 10th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, May 20–24 Orlando, Florida, (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. Lee, K.K. Choi, Y. Noh, L. Zhao, and D. Gorsich, “Sampling-Based Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis Using Score Functions for RBDO Problems with Correlated Random Variables,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 133 (2011), 021003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. I. Lee, K.K. Choi, and L. Zhao, “Sampling-Based RBDO Using the Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis and Dynamic Kriging Method,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 44 (2011), 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Rigoni and S. Poles, “NBI and MOGA-II, Two Complementary Algorithms for Multi-Objective Optimization,” Practical Approaches to Multiobjective Optimization, (Dagstuhl Germany: Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum für Informatik (IBFI), 2005), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hardin, R., Choi, K.K., Beckermann, C. (2014). Reliability-Based Casting Process Design Optimization. In: Tiryakioğlu, M., Campbell, J., Byczynski, G. (eds) Shape Casting: 5th International Symposium 2014. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48130-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics