Skip to main content

Effects of Microstructural Anisotropy on the Mechanical Properties of Aluminum Alloy AA 7010 — T7651

  • Conference paper
TMS 2015 144th Annual Meeting & Exhibition

Abstract

The effect of microstructural anisotropy on the mechanical response of a heavily rolled 7010 – T7651 Al alloy has been investigated. A comprehensive set of quasi-static and dynamic (shockloading) experiments were conducted on specimens with their loading axis along the rolling (RD) and through-the-thickness (TT) directions. Deformed specimens were characterized via optical and electron backscatter diffraction techniques. The results show that specimens tested along the TT direction exhibit a higher elastic limit and moduli; whereas specimens tested along the RD direction exhibit a higher ductility and fracture stress. For the case of shock-loaded specimens, it was found that void nucleation was dependent on the grain boundary orientation with respect to the applied load, whereas angle misorientation and Taylor factor differences of adjacent grains did not contribute significantly to the damage development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 319.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Seco tools. (2014) ‘Material background: The essential material characteristics of Aluminium 7010’, (online) Available: https://www.secotools.com/en/Global/Segment-Solutions/Aerospace-Solutions/ASMaterial-main/Heat-resistant-super-alloys2/Inconel-71871/ [Accessed 01 May 2014]

    Google Scholar 

  2. ASTM. (2009). ‘Standard Test Methods of Compression Testing of Metallic Materials at Room Temperature.’ ASTM E9–09

    Google Scholar 

  3. Instron, ‘Tension testing of metallic materials (ASTM E8)’, (online) Available http://www.instron.com.au/wa/solutions/astm_e8_tension_testing_metallic_materials.a [Accessed 01 june 2014]

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.P. Escobedo, E.K. Cerreta, and D. Dennis-Koller, (2013), ‘Effect of Crystalline Structure on Intergranular Failure during Shock Loading’,JOM Vol 66, 156, 2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Gfinicki, A. Vautrin, P. Soukatchoff, J. Franfois-Brazier, ‘Plate Impact Testing Method for GRC Materials’, ELSEVIER Cement & Concrete Composites (1994), 241

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Enfedaque, D. Cendón, F. Gálvez, V. Sánchez-Gálvez, (2011)‘Failure and impact behavior of facade panels made of glass fiber reinforced cement(GRC)’ Engineering Failure Analysis 18, 1652.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.R. Curran, L. Seaman, and D.A. Shockey, (1987), ‘Dynamic Failure Of Solids’, PHYSICS REPORTS (Review Section of Physics Letters) 147, Nos. 5 & 6, 253

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. William, K. Ramesh and D. Dandekar, (2012), ‘ Spall response of 1100-O aluminum’, Journal Of Applied Physics 111, 123528

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Schwartz, J. Cazamias, P. Fiske, and R. Minich, (2002) ‘Grain Size and Pressure Effects on Spall Strength in Copper’, American Institute of Physics 0–7354–0068

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Escobedo, J. P, D. Dennis-Koller, E.K. Cerreta, B.M. Patterson, C.A. Bronkhorst, B.L. Hansen, D. Tonks, and R. A Lebensohn, (2011). ‘Effects of grain size and boundary structure on the dynamic tensile response of copper’, Journal Of Applied Physics 110, 033513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Buchar, J. Hrebicek, ‘The Dynamic (Spall) Strength of Steels’ Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, Vol. 43 (1993), No. I, 73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. X. Chen, J. R. Asay, A and S. K. Dwivedi (2006), ‘Spall behavior of aluminum with varying microstructures’, Journal of Applied Physics, Vol 99, 023528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Antoun T, Seaman L, Curran D R, Kanel G I, Razorenov S V and Utkin A V, (2003), ‘Spall Fracture’, New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Hazell, (2014), ‘Impact Dynamics — Week 3 Notes’, UNSW. Page 19

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pace Technologies, (2014), ‘Metallographic Etchants — Aluminum’, Available:http://www.metallographic.com/Etchants/Aluminum%20etchants.htm [Accessed 07 Jun 2014]

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Adams, S. Wright, and K. Kunze, (1993), ‘Orientation Imaging: the emergence of a new Microscopy’ Metallurgical Transactions A, Vol. 160(2), 229

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Dingly, (2012), Tutorial 3 – ‘The importance of orientation measurement in polycrystalline materials’, (online), Available:http://www.ebsd.org.uk/tutorial_3.html [Accessed 12 Sep 2014]

    Google Scholar 

  18. X. Duan, D. Wang, K. Wang, and F. Han, (2013) ‘Twinning behaviour of TWIP steel studies by Taylor Factor analysis.’

    Google Scholar 

  19. U. Kocks, H. Mecking, (2003), Physics And Phenomenology of strain hardening: the FCC case, Progress in Materials Science 48, 171–273, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society)

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cranston, A.L., Hazell, P.J., Appleby-Thomas, G.J., Zakaria, Q.M., Escobedo, J.P. (2015). Effects of Microstructural Anisotropy on the Mechanical Properties of Aluminum Alloy AA 7010 — T7651. In: TMS 2015 144th Annual Meeting & Exhibition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48127-2_113

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics