Skip to main content

Conclusions: Toward an Understanding of Participation in and through Technology

  • 131 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter offers a discussion of the findings and their theoretical and practical implications, conclusions, limitations of this project, and thoughts on how future research can advance the ideas raised in this volume. Here, I offer a liberation technology model, based off the four sites under study, that helps us better understand what factors influence alternative media’s use of liberating technologies.

Keywords

  • Social Medium
  • Internet Access
  • Digital Divide
  • Information Communication Technology
  • Citizen Participation

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48039-8_8
  • Chapter length: 22 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-48039-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 8.1
Fig. 8.2

Notes

  1. 1.

    The actual Spanish is informar, formar, and transformar, worth noting for their common root, formar.

Bibliography

  • Atton, Chris. 2009. “Alternative and Citizen Journalism.” In The Handbook of Journalism Studies, edited by Karin Wahl-Jorgensen and Thomas Hanitzsch, 265–278. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Olga G., Bart Cammaert, Bart Cammaerts, and Nico Carpentier. 2008. Understanding Alternative Media. New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, Anita, and Yanina Welp. 2014. “Digital Trends in Latin American Politics (1990–2012).” In Digital Technologies for Democratic Governance in Latin America, edited by Anita Breuer and Yanina Welp, 1–16. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier, Nico. 2011. Media and Participation: A Site of Ideological-Democratic Struggle. Chicago: Intellect Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza-Chock, Sasha. 2014. Out of the Shadows, into the Streets: Transmedia Organizing and the Immigrant Rights Movement. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, James. 2003. “Global Journalism: A Case Study of the Internet.” In Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, edited by Nick Couldry and James Curran, 227–241. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, Peter. 2006. “Doing Citizenship: The Cultural Origins of Civic Agency in the Public Sphere.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 9(3): 267–286.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry. 2010. “Liberation Technologies.” Journal of Democracy 21(3): 69–83.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Enzensberger, Hans Magnus. 1976. Raids and Reconstructions: Essays on Politics, Crime and Culture. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. 2016. Freedom in the World. http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2016

  • Freire, Paulo. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, Malcolm. 2010. “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted.” The New Yorker, October. http://goo.gl/dtGi1

  • Harcup, Tony. 2011. “Alternative Journalism as Active Citizenship.” Journalism 12(1): 15–31.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Internet World Stats. 2012. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats12.htm#central

  • Kahn, Richard, and Douglas Kellner. 2004. “New Media and Internet Activism: From the ‘Battle of Seattle’ to Blogging.” New Media & Society 6(1): 87–95.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Latinobarómetro. 2011. “Latinobarómetro análisis de datos.” http://www.latinobarometro.org/latOnline.jsp

  • Lindlof, Thomas R., and Bryan C. Taylor. 2011. Qualitative Communication Research Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmura, Stephen. 2008. “A Net Advantage? The Internet, Grassroots Activism and American Middle-Eastern Policy.” New Media and Society 10(2): 247–271.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Barbero, Jesús. 1993. Communication, Culture and Hegemony: From the Media to Mediations. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattoni, Alice, and Emiliano Treré. 2014. “Media Practices, Mediation Processes, and Mediatization in the Study of Social Movements.” Communication Theory 24(3): 252–271.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McAnany, Emile. G. 1986. “Seminal Ideas in Latin American Critical Communication Research: An Agenda for the North.” In Communication and Latin American Society: Trends in Critical Research, 1960–1985, edited by Rita Atwood and Emile G. McAnany, 28–47. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, Evgeny. 2011. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, Clemencia. 2001. Fissures in the Mediascape. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treré, Emiliano, and Alice Mattoni. 2016. “Media Ecologies and Protest Movements: Main Perspectives and Key Lessons.” Information, Communication & Society 19(3): 290–306.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. 1980. Many Voices, One World (Report by the International Commission for the study of Communication Problems). Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagron, Alfonso Gumucio. 2001. Making Waves: Stories of Participatory Communication for Social Change. New York: The Rockefeller Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harlow, S. (2017). Conclusions: Toward an Understanding of Participation in and through Technology. In: Liberation Technology in El Salvador. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48039-8_8

Download citation