Skip to main content

Common Threads: A Comparative Analysis

  • 119 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter compares and contrasts the two traditional media sites with each other and the two online-only sites with each other, and then compares and contrasts the traditional versus online-only media sites, in order to explore common challenges and benefits of incorporating new technologies. Such a holistic analysis allows insight into the context that influences the possibilities and limitations of using digital tools for social change in El Salvador. Generally, this chapter shows that the four sites incorporated digital tools into their daily processes to various degrees, and their incorporation of ICTs affected citizen participation. Who participated, how they participated, and what they participated in varied among the projects, and this variance can be linked to professional identity, mission, and digital inequalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48039-8_7
  • Chapter length: 20 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-48039-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Notes

  1. 1.

    In 2011, the Legislative Assembly’s decree limiting the authority of the Constitutional Court promoted massive protests in San Salvador.

  2. 2.

    Results of an ANOVA test showed that the kind of text (i.e., headline, pulled quote, or commentary) written to accompany posted links was significantly related to levels of interactivity. Results showed significant differences regarding the number of “likes” per post F(3, 273) = 27.644, p < 0.001; number of comments per post F(3, 273) = 26.894, p < 0.001; and number of times users shared the post F(3, 273) = 13.509, p < 0.001. Post-hoc Tukey’s tests indicated that posting commentary to accompany a link generated significantly more likes (M = 25, S.D. = 43.746), comments (M = 17.67, S.D. = 31.803), and shares (M = 9.571, S.D. = 24.338) than simply either posting a headline or a pulled quote.

  3. 3.

    Results of an independent sample t-test showed that the number of comments a post generated was significantly related to whether the site responded to users’ comments on that post (F = 22.821, t = –1.331, p < 0.001). The mean number of comments when a site posted a response to users’ comments was 27.13, compared with a mean of 12.04 comments if the site posted no response at all.

  4. 4.

    It should be noted that the digital divide factors into this failure to take full advantage of Facebook as a form of liberation technology. This is discussed further in Chapter 8.

Bibliography

  • Agosta, Diana. E. 2007. “Constructing Civil Society, Supporting Local Development: A Case Study of Community Radio in Postwar EI Salvador.” Democratic Communiqué 21(1): 4–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, Ingrid, and Summer Harlow. 2012. “Opening the Gates: Interactive and Multimedia Elements of Newspaper Websites in Latin America.” Journalism Practice 6(2): 217–232.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, Shayne, and Chris Willis. 2003. We media: How audiences are shaping the future of news and information. http://www.hypergene.net/wemedia/download/we_media.pdf

  • Breuer, Anita, and Yanina Welp. 2014. “Digital Trends in Latin American Politics (1990–2012).” In Digital Technologies for Democratic Governance in Latin America, edited by Anita Breuer and Yanina Welp, 1–16. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza-Chock, Sasha. 2014. Out of the Shadows, into the Streets: Transmedia Organizing and the Immigrant Rights Movement. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Deuze, Mark. 2005. “What Is Journalism? Professional Identity and Ideology of Journalists Reconsidered.” Journalism 6(4): 442–464.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Elizabeth, and Silvio R. Waisbord 2002. “Latin Politics, Global Media.” In Latin Politics, Global Media, edited by Elizabeth Fox and Silvio R. Waisbord, 1–21. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, Paulo. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Elisabeth Jay. 2005. “The Reality of Virtual Reality: The Internet and Gender Equality Advocacy in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society 47(3): 1–34.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Internet World Stats. 2012. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats12.htm#central

  • Rodríguez, Clemencia. 2001. Fissures in the Mediascape. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, Clemencia, Benjamin Ferron, and Kristin Shamas. 2014. “Four Challenges in the Field of Alternative, Radical and Citizens’ Media Research.” New Media & Society 36(2): 150–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, Michael. 2001. “The Objectivity Norm in American Journalism.” Journalism 2(2): 149–170.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, Herman. 2007. “Is a New Worldwide Web Possible? An Explorative Comparison of the Use of ICTs by Two South African Social Movements.” African Studies Review 50(1): 109–131.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rockwell, Rick, and Noreene Janus. 2003. Media Power in Central America. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harlow, S. (2017). Common Threads: A Comparative Analysis. In: Liberation Technology in El Salvador. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48039-8_7

Download citation