Skip to main content
Book cover

Liberation Technology in El Salvador pp 1–23Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Introduction

  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the goal of the book: to understand whether and how alternative media in El Salvador incorporated digital technologies, online social media in particular, for social change, and whether incorporating said technologies changed citizen participation not only in the media process but also in a broader discursive sphere as well as in civic and political life. In other words, what factors influenced the extent to which alternative media producers managed to use digital tools in liberating ways, opening a space for participation in technology (as content producers) and through technology (as engaged citizens)?

Keywords

  • Social Medium
  • Digital Divide
  • Citizen Participation
  • Alternative Medium
  • Social Media Platform

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48039-8_1
  • Chapter length: 23 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-48039-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This research was funded with an Inter-American Foundation Grassroots Development Fellowship.

  2. 2.

    I use the terms “legacy” or “traditional” to identify analog media outlets, such as printed newspapers or radio, as opposed to digital/online, “new” media outlets. For the purposes of this book, alternative media (as opposed to mainstream) can be traditional media or digital “new” media.

Bibliography

  • Agar, Michael. 1995. “Literary Journalism as Ethnography: Exploring the Excluded Middle.” In Representation in Ethnography, edited by John Van Maanen, 112–129. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agosta, Diana. E. 2007. “Constructing Civil Society, Supporting Local Development: A Case Study of Community Radio in Postwar EI Salvador.” Democratic Communiqué 21(1): 4–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarenga, Luís. 2009. “La importancia de los medios de comunicación alternativos: No hay medio de comunicación pequeño,” Diario CoLatino, March 25. http://www.diariocolatino.com/es/20090325/opiniones/65101/

  • Aouragh, Miriyam. 2008. “Everyday Resistance on the Internet: The Palestinian Context.” Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research 1(2): 109–130.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, David. 1981. A Trumpet to Arms: Alternative Media in America. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askanius, Tina, and Nils Gustafsson. 2010. “Mainstreaming the Alternative: The Changing Media Practices of Protest Movements.” Interface 2(2): 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atton, Chris. 2002. Alternative Media. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atton, Chris. 2003. “Reshaping Social Movement Media for a New Millennium.” Social Movement Studies 2(1): 3–15.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Atton, Chris. 2004. An Alternative Internet: Radical Media, Politics and Creativity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Beltrán, Luis Ramiro. 1980. “A Farewell to Aristotle: ‘Horizontal’ Communication.” Communication 5(1): 5–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. 2012. “The Logic of Connective Action. Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics.” Information, Communication and Society 15(5): 739–768.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, Rodney. 2003. “Commercialism and Critique: California’s Alternative Weeklies.” In Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, edited by Nick Couldry and James Curran, 111–127. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, S. Elizabeth 1987. “Anthropological Methods Relevant for Journalists.” Journalism Educator 41(4): 5–10.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, Bertolt. 1983. “Radio as a Means of Communication.” In Communication and Class Struggle: Liberation, Socialism, edited by Armand Mattelart and Seth Sieglaub, Vol. 2, 169–171. New York: International General.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, Anita, and Yanina Welp. 2014. “Digital Trends in Latin American Politics (1990–2012).” In Digital Technologies for Democratic Governance in Latin America, edited by Anita Breuer and Yanina Welp, 1–16. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodock, Katharine, Mary Joyce, and Timo Zaeck. 2009. “Digital Activism Survey Report 2009.” Accessed August 12, 2016, http://akgul.bilkent.edu.tr/DigitalActivisim-SurveyReport2009.pdf

  • Carpentier, Nico. 2011. Media and Participation: A Site of Ideological-Democratic Struggle. Chicago: Intellect Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartier, Carolyn, Manuel Castells, and Jack Linchuan Qiu 2005. “The Information Have-less: Inequality, Mobility, and Translocal Networks in Chinese Cities.” Studies in Comparative International Development 40(2): 9–34.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, Jamais. 2009. “The Dark Side of Twittering a Revolution.” Fast Company, June 17, http://www.fastcompany.com/1296603/dark-side-twittering-revolution

  • Castells, Manuel. 2001. The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel. 2007. “Communication, Power and Counter-Power in the Network Society.” International Journal of Communication 1: 238–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel. 2009. Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Joseph Man, and Chin-Chuan Lee. 1984. “The Journalistic Paradigm on Civil Protests: A Case Study of Hong Kong.” In The News Media in National and International Conflict, edited by Andrew Arno and Wimal Dissanayake, 183–202. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza-Chock, Sasha. 2014. Out of the Shadows, into the Streets: Transmedia Organizing and the Immigrant Rights Movement. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, Nick. 2006. “Culture and Citizenship: The Missing Link?” European Journal of Cultural Studies 9(3): 321–339.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, James. 2003. “Global Journalism: A Case Study of the Internet.” In Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, edited by Nick Couldry and James Curran, 227–241. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling, Juanita. 2008. Latin America, Media, and Revolution. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman. 2003. “The Practices and Politics of Interpretation.” In Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, edited by Norman Denzin and Yvonna Lincoln, 458–498. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry. 2010. “Liberation Technologies.” Journal of Democracy 21(3): 69–83.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, John. 2001. Radical Media: Rebellious Communication and Social Movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, John. 2002. “International Communication and the Extremist Right.” In Citizenship and Participation in the Information Age, edited by Manjunath Pendakur and Roma M. Harris, 137–146. Aurora, ON: Garamond Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, Jennifer, Katrina Kimport, Greg Prieto, Carly Rush, and Kimberly Reynoso. 2010. “Changing the World One Webpage at a Time: Conceptualizing and Explaining Internet Activism.” Mobilization: An International Journal 15(4): 425–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enzensberger, Hans Magnus. 1976. Raids and Reconstructions: Essays on Politics, Crime and Culture. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, Paulo. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, Todd. 1980. The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, Malcolm. 2010. “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted.” The New Yorker, October. http://goo.gl/dtGi1

  • Gurevitch, Michael, and Jay G. Blumler. 1990. “Political Communication Systems and Democratic Values.” In Media Power in Politics, edited by Doris Graber, 24–35. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini. 2012. “Introduction.” In Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World, edited by Daniel C. Hallin and Paolo Mancini, 1–7. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, Summer. 2012. “Social Media and Social Movements: Facebook and an Online Guatemalan Justice Movement that Moved Offline.” New Media and Society 14(2): 225–243.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Huesca, Robert, and Brenda Dervin 1994. “Theory and Practice in Latin American Alternative Communication Research.” Journal of Communication 44(4): 53–73.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Internet World Stats. 2012. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats12.htm#central

  • Kahn, Richard, and Douglas Kellner. 2004. “New Media and Internet Activism: From the ‘Battle of Seattle’ to Blogging.” New Media & Society 6(1): 87–95.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, Douglas M. 2000. “Habermas, the Public Sphere and Democracy: A Critical Intervention.” In Perspectives on Habermas, edited by Lewis Edwin Hahn, 259–287. Peru, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, Lauren. 1984. The Dissident Press: Alternative Journalism in American History. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, Dorothy. 2003. “Indymedia: A New Communications Commons.” In Cyberactivism: Online Acts in Theory and Practice, edited by Martha McCaughey and Michael D. Ayers, 47–69. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalchuk, Lisa. 2009. “Can Movement Tactics Influence Media Coverage?: Health-Care Struggle in the Salvadoran News.” Latin American Research Review 44(2): 109–135.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lievrouw, Leah A. 2011. Alternative and Activist New Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Barbero, Jesús. 1993. Communication, Culture and Hegemony: From the Media to Mediations. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattelart, Armand. 2002. “An archaeology of the global era: constructing a belief.” Media, Culture & Society 24(5): 591–612.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mattoni, Alice, and Emiliano Treré. 2014. “Media Practices, Mediation Processes, and Mediatization in the Study of Social Movements.” Communication Theory 24(3): 252–271.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, Douglas M., and James K. Hertog. 1999. “Social Control, Social Change and the Mass Media’s Role in the Regulation of Protest Groups.” In Mass Media, Social Control and Social Change: A Macrosocial Perspective, edited by David Demers and Kasisomayajula Viswanath, 305–330. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, Denis. 1994. McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mody, Bella, Stephanie Alexander, Daniel Stencel, and Alex M. Ingersoll 2007. “The Other in North American Doctoral Dissertations: Early Findings.” Global Media and Communication 3(3): 313–320.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1984. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” Boundary 2: 333–358.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2003. “Under Western Eyes” Revisited: Feminist Solidarity through Anticapitalist Struggles.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(2): 499–535.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, Evgeny. 2011. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, Diana C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nassanga, Goretti Linda, Linje Manyozo, and Claudia Lopes. 2013. “ICTs and Radio in Africa: How the Uptake of ICT has Influenced the Newsroom Culture Among Community Radio Journalists.” Telematics and Informatics 30(3): 258–266.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pick, James B., Martha Garcia Murillo, and Carlos J. Navarrete 2007. “Information Technology Research in Latin America: Editorial Introduction to the Special Issue.” Information Technology for Development 13(3): 207–216.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Poell, Thomas. 2014. “Social Media and the Transformation of Activist Communication: Exploring the Social Media Ecology of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests.” Information, Communication and Society 17(6): 716–731. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.812674.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Postmes, Tom, and Suzanne Brunsting. 2002. “Collective Action in the Age of the Internet: Mass Communication and Online Mobilization.” Social Science Computer Review 20(3): 290–301.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes Matta, Fernando 1986. “Alternative Communication: Solidarity and Development in the Face of Transnational Development.” In Communication and Latin American Society: Trends in Critical Research, 1960–1985, edited by Rita Atwood and Emile G. McAnany, 190–214. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, Clemencia. 2001. Fissures in the Mediascape. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, Marisol, and Christian Fuchs. 2010. “Towards a Critical Theory of Alternative Media.” Telematics and Informatics 27(2): 141–150.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Segerberg, Alezandra, and W. Lance Bennett. 2011. “Social Media and the Organization of Collective Action: Using Twitter to Explore the Ecologies of Two Climate Change Protests.” The Communication Review 14(3): 197–215.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sel, Susana. 2009. “Comunicación alternativa y políticas públicas en el combate latinoamericano.” In La Comunicación Mediatizada: Hegemonías, Alternatividades, Soberanías, edited by Susana Sel, 13–36. Buenos Aires, Argentina: CLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirky, Clay. 2008. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, Toshie. 2007. “De-Westernizing Media Studies: A Japanese Perspective.” Global Media and Communication 3(3): 330–335.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tillmann-Healy, Lisa M. 2003. “Friendship as Method.” Qualitative Inquiry 9(5): 729–749.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1993. “Contentious Repertoires in Great Britain, 1758–1834.” Social Science History 17(2): 253–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, José. 2009. “Users Like You? Theorizing Agency in User-Generated Content.” Media, Culture and Society 31(1): 41–58.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vilches, Alma. 2012. “Diario CoLatino y ARPAS coordinan esfuerzos mediante convenio de cooperación.” Diario CoLatino (July 31). http://www.diariocolatino.com/es/20120731/nacionales/106162/Diario-Co-Latino-y-ARPAS-coordinan-esfuerzos-mediante-convenio-de-cooperaci%25C3%25B3n.html

  • Vinelli, Natalia, and Carlos Rodríguez Esperón. 2004. Desarmando espejismos. In Contrainformación: Medios Alternativos para la Acción Política, edited by Natalia Vinelli and Carlos Rodríguez Esperón. Buenos Aires: Continente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atton, Chris. Ed. 2015. The Routledge companion to alternative and community media. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcup, Tony. 2013. Alternative Journalism, Alternative Voices. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Communication, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA

    Summer Harlow

Authors
  1. Summer Harlow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harlow, S. (2017). Introduction. In: Liberation Technology in El Salvador. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48039-8_1

Download citation