Advertisement

Alle Wege Führen Zum Text

  • Mauro GiuffrèEmail author
Chapter
Part of the UNIPA Springer Series book series (USS)

Abstract

The intention of this chapter is to review the development of linguistic research during the twentieth century in Europe and the United States, in order to show that the genesis of text linguistics as a comprehensive theoretical framework was necessary, considering the events from a post-eventum perspective. Firstly, structural linguistics is presented as well as its main exponents; secondly, generative linguistics is discussed; thirdly, the genesis and the development of text linguistics is presented. Concerning the structural linguistics, the key issues investigated by 4 linguists (namely, de Saussure, Benveniste, Hjelmslev and Bloomfield) are summarized. Concerning the generative linguistics, Chomsky’s strengths and weaknesses are highlighted and the main question of semantics is critically exposed, in order to take into account similarities and differences between generative, interpretative and model-theoretic semantics. When these theoretical issues became widespread, linguistics came to the so-called linguistic turn. Concerning the text linguistics, its history is distinguished in three different phases: (1) the initial stage of the mid-Sixties; (2) the formulation of textual grammars; (3) the elaboration of textual theories. Among these theoretical proposals, the very well-known are the ones by van Dijk and by Petőfi.

Keywords

Structural linguistics Generative linguistics Linguistic turn Model-theoretic semantics Text linguistics 

References

Modern Studies

  1. Albaladejo, Tomaso. 1989. Retórica. Madrid: Editorial Sintesis.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, Keith. 1992. Semantics. An overview. In International Encyclopaedia of Linguistics, ed. William Bright, 394–398. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, John Langshaw. 1979. Philosophical Papers, ed. James Opie Urmson and Geoffrey James Warnock. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua. 1970. Language and Information. Selected Essays on their Theory and Application, ed. Yehoshua Bar-Hillel. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  5. Barthes, Roland. 1970. L’ancienne rhétorique. Communications 16: 172–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benveniste, Émile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale I. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  7. Benveniste, Émile. 1969. Le Vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  8. Benveniste, Émile. 1973. Problems in General Linguistics. Miami: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
  9. Benveniste, Émile. 1974. Problèmes de linguistique générale II. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  10. Bernárdez, Enrique. 1982. Introducción a la lingüística del texto. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
  11. Bierwisch, Manfred. 1965. Review of Z. S. Harris’ Discourse Analysis Reprints. Linguistics 13(1): 61–73.Google Scholar
  12. Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  13. Bonomi, Andrea. 1973. La struttura logica del linguaggio. Milano: Bompiani.Google Scholar
  14. Bonomi, Andrea. 1983. Linguistica e logica. In Intorno alla linguistica, ed. Cesare Segre, 148–171. Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
  15. Bonomi, Andrea, and Giorgio Usberti. 1971. Sintassi e semantica nella grammatica trasformazionale. Milano: Il Saggiatore.Google Scholar
  16. Carnap, Rudolf. 1937. Logical syntax of language. New York: Humanities [Republished as Carnap, Rudolf. 2001. Logical Syntax of Language. Abingdon (UK) - New York: Routledge].Google Scholar
  17. Chierchia, Gennaro. 1992. Logica e linguistica. Il contributo di Montague. In Introduzione alla filosofia analitica del linguaggio, ed. Marco Santambrogio, 287–365. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  18. Chomsky, Noam Avram. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Chomsky, Noam Avram. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  20. Chomsky, Noam Avram. 1968. Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace & World Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chomsky, Noam Avram. 1972. Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  22. Chomsky, Noam Avram. 1975. Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  23. Chomsky, Noam Avram. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding : The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Chomsky, Noam Avram. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View from Building 20, ed. Ken Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Conte, Maria-Elisabeth (ed.). 1977. La linguistica testuale. Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
  26. Conte, Maria-Elisabeth. 1983. La pragmatica linguistica. In Intorno alla linguistica, ed. Cesare Segre, 94–128. Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
  27. de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1879. Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
  28. Coşeriu, Eugeniu. 1955–1956. Determinación y entorno. Dos problemas de una lingüística del hablar. Romanistiches Jahrbuch 7 (1): 24-54.Google Scholar
  29. Coşeriu, Eugeniu. 1980. Textlinguistik. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
  30. Cresswell, Maxwell John. 1973. Logics and Languages. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  31. Cresswell, Maxwell John. 1992. Truth-conditional and model-theoretic semantics, Vol. III. In International Encyclopaedia of Linguistics, ed. William Bright, 404–405. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Crystal, David. 2006. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. de Beaugrande, Robert-Alain, and Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler. 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London-New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  34. De Mauro, Tullio. 2007. Prefazione. In Eugenio Coseriu. Il linguaggio e l’uomo attuale. Saggi di filosofia del linguaggio, ed. Cristian Bota and Massimo Schiavi, 9–16. Verona: Fondazione Centro Studi Campostrini.Google Scholar
  35. de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale, ed. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye. Lausanne-Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  36. Dessons, Gérard. 1993. Émile Benveniste. Paris: Bertrand-Lacoste.Google Scholar
  37. Di Cesare, Donatella. 2000. Introduzione. In Linguistica del testo. Introduzione all’ermeneutica del senso, edited by Donatella Di Cesare, 11–19. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
  38. Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammer: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht-Boston-London: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dowty, David, Robert Wall, and Peters Stanley. 1981. Introduction to Montague Semantics. Dordrecht-Boston-London: Reidel.Google Scholar
  40. Dragos, Emil. 1986. Cohesion and coherence in Romanian linguistics (A historical survey). In Research in Text Connexity and Text Coherence, ed. Michel Charolles, János Sándor Petöfi and Emil Sozer, 179–197. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
  41. Dressler, Wolfgang Ulrich. 1972. Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  42. Eikmeyer, Hans Jürgen. 1980. Formal methods in text semantics. In Some Aspects of Formal Foundation in Text Semantics, ed. Hans Jürgen Eikmeyer, Wolfgang Heydrich and János Sándor Petöfi, 1–18. Bielefeld: Projekt Formale Textsemantik (= Materialien des Universitätsschwerpunktes Mathematisierung der Einzelwissenschaften, Heft XXVI).Google Scholar
  43. Fries, Udo. 1975. Studien zur Textlinguistik. Braumüller: Frage- und Antwortsätze. Eine Analyse an neuenglischen Dramentexten. Wien-Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  44. Giuffrè, Mauro (ed.). 2011a. Studies in Semiotic Textology in Honour of János S. Petöfi (= Sprachtheorie und Germanistische Linguistik Supplement 1). Münster: Nodus Publikationen.Google Scholar
  45. Giuffrè, Mauro. 2011b. How did text research lead to semiotic textology? In Studies in Semiotic Textology in Honour of János S. Petőfi (= Sprachtheorie und germanistische Linguistik Supplement 1), ed. Mauro Giuffrè, 9–26. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.Google Scholar
  46. Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1966. Eléments pour une théorie de l’interprétation du récit mythique. Communications 8(1): 28–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hall-Partee, Barbara. 1976. Montague Grammar. New York San Francisco London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Harris, Zellig Sabbetai. 1951. Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Harris, Zellig Sabbetai. 1952. Discourse Analysis. Language 28: 474–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Harris, Zellig Sabbetai. 1963. Discourse Analysis Reprints. The Hague: Mouton & Co., Publishers.Google Scholar
  51. Hartmann, Peter. 1964. Text, Texte, Klassen von Texten. Bogawus. Zeitschrift für Literatur, Kunst und Philosophie 2: 15–25.Google Scholar
  52. Hjelmslev, Louis Trolle. 1928. Principes de grammaire générale. Copenhague: AF Høst.Google Scholar
  53. Hjelmslev, Louis Trolle. 1935. La catégorie des cas. Étude de grammaire générale. première partie. Vol. Acta Jutlandica VII 1. Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  54. Hjelmslev, Louis Trolle. 1943. Omkring sprogteoriens grundlæggelse. København: Akademisk Forlag [English version published as Hjelmslev, Louis Trolle. 1969. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Trans. F.J. Whitfield. Madison (Milwaukee) and London: University of Wisconsin Press].Google Scholar
  55. Hjelmslev, Louis Trolle. 1975. Résumé of a Theory of Language, vol. XVI. København: Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag.Google Scholar
  56. Ihwe, Jens, and Hannes Rieser. 1972. Versuch einer Exploration des „Versuchs einer Exploration der neuentdeckten Formelwälder von der Insel Mainau“ von Werner Kummer. Linguistische Berichte 18: 56–58.Google Scholar
  57. Katz, Jerrold Jacob. 1967. Recent issues in semantic theory. Foundations of Language 3: 124–194.Google Scholar
  58. Katz, Jerrold Jacob, and Jerry Alan Fodor. 1963. The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39(2): 170–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kummer, Werner. 1972a. Versuch einer Exploration der neuentdeckten Formelwälder von der Insel Mainau. Linguistische Berichte 18: 44–53.Google Scholar
  60. Kummer, Werner. 1972b. Zum „Versuch einer Exploration des, Versuchs einer Exploration der neuentdeckten Formelwälder von der Insel Mainau’ von Werner Kummer“. Linguistische Berichte 19: 78–79.Google Scholar
  61. La Matina, Marcello. 1994. Il testo antico. Palermo: L’Epos.Google Scholar
  62. Lakoff, George. 1970. Linguistics and natural logic. Synthese 22(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
  63. Lepschy, Giulio Cesare. 1979. L’arbitrarietà del segno. Stampatori Editore: Intorno a Saussure. Torino.Google Scholar
  64. Lepschy, Giulio Cesare. 1990. Storia della linguistica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  65. Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. McCawley, James. 1972. Syntactic and Logical Arguments for Semantic Structures. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
  67. McCawley, James. 1981. Everything that Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know about Logic (but Were Ashamed to Ask). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  68. McMahon, William. 1976. Hans Reichenbach’s Philosophy of Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  69. Petőfi, János Sándor. 1971. Transformationsgrammatiken und eine ko-textuelle Texttheorie. Athenäum: Grundfragen und Konzeptionen. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  70. Petőfi, János Sándor. 1973. Towards an empirically motivated grammatical theory of verbal texts. In Studies in Text Grammar, ed. János Sándor Petöfi and Hannes Rieser, 205–275. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Reidel.Google Scholar
  71. Petőfi, János Sándor. 1975. Vers une théorie partielle du texte. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
  72. Petőfi, János Sándor. 1977. Semantica, Pragmatica, Teoria del testo. In La linguistica testuale, ed. Maria-Elisabeth Conte, 195–223. Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
  73. Petőfi, János Sándor. 2004. Scrittura e interpretazione. Introduzione alla Testologia Semiotica dei testi verbali. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
  74. Prince, Ellen. 1978. Discorse analysis in the framework of Z. S. Harris. In Current Trends in Text Linguistics, ed. Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler, 191–211. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  75. Reichenbach, Hans. 1948. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  76. Stegmüller, Wolfgang. 1975. Hauptströmungen der Gegenwartsphilosophie. Eine kritische Einführung. Stuttgart: Kröner.Google Scholar
  77. Suppes, Patrick. 1973. Logic, methodology and philosophy of science IV. In Proceedings of the 4th International Congress for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Bucharest, 1971, ed. Patrick Suppes, L. Henkin, Gr. C. Moisil and A. Joja. Studies in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  78. Vianu, Tudor. 1941. Arta prozatorilor români. Bucureşti: Eminescu.Google Scholar
  79. Weinrich, Harald. 1964. Tempus. Besprochene und erzählte Welt. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations