Abstract
Robustness has been recognized as interesting research topic due to several collapses that have been occurring over last years. Indeed, this subject is related with global failure or collapse. However, its definition is not consensual since several definitions have been proposed in the literature. This short-paper aims to present a framework for assessing bridge’s robustness as a probabilistic performance indicator. In this study, a non-linear model of a clamped beam with two point loads using DIANA software was developed to validate the framework presented. By means of a probabilistic approach, the load carrying capacity and structural safety were evaluated. In this regard, special focus is placed on an adaptive Monte Carlo simulation procedure to achieve a proper meta-model.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baker JW, Schubert M, Faber MH (2008) On the assessment of robustness. Struct Saf 30(3)
Biondini F, Restelli S (2008) Damage propagation and structural robustness. In: Proc. of Int Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering, IALCCE 08, Varenna, Italy, June 11–14
Bucher CG, Bourgund U (1990) A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems. Struct Saf 7(1)
Canisius T, Sorensen J, Baker J (2007) Robustness of structural systems - a new focus for the joint committee on structural safety (JCSS). In Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Application of Statistic and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP10
Cavaco E (2013) Robustness of corroded bridges, PhD thesis, Universidade Nova de Lisboa
EN CEN (1992) Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures. Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings, 2010
Frangopol DM, Curley JP (1987) Effects of damage and redundancy on structural reliability. J Struct Eng 113(7)
Fu G, Frangopol DM (1990) Balancing weight, system reliability and redundancy in a multiobjective optimization framework. Struct Saf 7(2)
Ghosn M, Moses F (1998) Redundancy in highway bridge superstructures
JCSS, Joint Committee on Structural Safety (2001). Probabilistic model code. 12th draft. Disponível em http://www.jcss.ethz.ch
Lind NC (1995) A measure of vulnerability and damage tolerance. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 48(1)
Rajashekhar MR, Ellingwood BR (1993) A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis. Struct Saf 12(3)
Starossek U, Haberland M (2010) Disproportionate collapse: terminology and procedures. J Perform Constr Facil 24(6)
Starossek U, Haberland M (2011) Approaches to measures of structural robustness. Struct Infrastruct Eng 7(7–8)
Wiśniewski DF (2007) Safety formats for the assessment of concrete bridges: with special focus on precast concrete, PhD thesis
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank ISISE—Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering (PEst-C/ECI/UI4029/2011 FCOM-01-0124-FEDER-022681), FCT– Portuguese Scientific Foundation for the research grant PD/BD/113677/2015. This study also received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement No. 606229. Also the collaboration and information provided by the professor António Abel Henriques is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Guimarães, H., Fernandes, J., Matos, J., Henriques, A. (2017). Robustness Assessment—A New Perspective to Achieve a Performance Indicator. In: Caspeele, R., Taerwe, L., Proske, D. (eds) 14th International Probabilistic Workshop . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47886-9_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47886-9_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47885-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47886-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)