Examining Community Policing on Twitter: Precinct Use and Community Response

  • Nina CesareEmail author
  • Emma S. Spiro
  • Hedwig Lee
  • Tyler McCormick
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10046)


A number of high-profile incidents have highlighted tensions between citizens and police, bringing issues of police-citizen trust and community policing to the forefront of the public’s attention. Efforts to mediate this tension emphasize the importance of promoting interaction and developing social relationships between citizens and police. This strategy – a critical component of community policing – may be employed in a variety of settings, including social media. While the use of social media as a community policing tool has gained attention from precincts and law enforcement oversight bodies, the ways in which police are expected to use social media to meet these goals remains an open question. This study seeks to explore how police are currently using social media as a community policing tool. It focuses on Twitter – a functionally flexible social media space – and considers whether and how law enforcement agencies are co-negotiating norms of engagement within this space, as well as how the public responds to the behavior of police accounts.


Police Community policing Social media Twitter 



This material is based upon work supported by, or in part by, the U. S. Army Research Laboratory and the U. S. Army Research Office under contract/grant numbers W911NF-12-1-0379 and W911NF-15-1-0270. Support also provided by NSF SES-1559778 to McCormick.


  1. 1.
    Bruns, A., Highfield, T., Lind, R.A.: Blogs, twitter, and breaking news: the produsage of citizen journalism. In: Produsing Theory in a Digital World: The intersection of Audiences and Production in Contemporary Theory, vol. 80, pp. 15–32 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doherty, C., Tyson, A., Weisel, R.: Few say police forces nationally do well in treating races equally. Pew Research Center: U.S. Politics and Policy (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Community Policing Consortium. Understanding community policing: a framework for action (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldsmith, A.: Police reform and the problem of trust. Theor. Criminol. 9(4), 443–470 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heverin, T., Zach, L.: Twitter for city police department information sharing. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 47(1), 1–7 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leetaru, K.H.: Who’s doing the talking on twitter? (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murthy, D.: Twitter: microphone for the masses? Media Cult. Soc. 33(5), 779 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    US Dept of Justice: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS). Community policing defined (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Final report on the president’s task force on 21st century policing (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Toole, K.: Chief o’toole’s announces new social media policy. Seattle police blotter (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stoutland, S.E.: The multiple dimensions of trust in resident/police relations in Boston. J. Res. Crime Delinquency 38(3), 226–256 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nina Cesare
    • 1
    Email author
  • Emma S. Spiro
    • 1
  • Hedwig Lee
    • 1
  • Tyler McCormick
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations