Advertisement

Senior Programmers: Characteristics of Elderly Users from Stack Overflow

  • Grzegorz KowalikEmail author
  • Radoslaw Nielek
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10047)

Abstract

In this paper we present results of research about elderly users of Stack Overflow (Question and Answer portal for programmers). They have different roles, different main activities and different habits. They are an important part of the community, as they tend to have higher reputation and they like to share their knowledge. This is a great example of possible way of keeping elderly people active and helpful for society.

Keywords

Elderly Stack Overflow Q&A Aging Online communities Programmers Crowdsourcing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project has received funding from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 690962.

References

  1. 1.
    Adamska, P., Juwin, M.: Study of the temporal-statistics-based reputation models for Q&A systems. Comput. Sci. 16(3), 253 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauer, D., Cavonius, C.R.: Improving the legibility of visual display units through contrast reversal. Ergon. Aspects Vis. Display Terminals 39, 137–142 (1980)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berdychevsky, L., Nimrod, G.: “let’s talk about sex”: Discussions in seniors’ online communities. J. Leisure Res. 47(4), 467 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brewer, R., Morris, M.R., Piper, A.M.: Why would anybody do this?: Understanding older adults’ motivations and challenges in crowd work. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2246–2257. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carmien, S., Manzanares, A.G.: Elders using smartphones – a set of research based heuristic guidelines for designers. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8514, pp. 26–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07440-5_3 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dickinson, A., Gregor, P.: Gregor.: Computer use has no demonstrated impact on the well-being of older adults. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 64(8), 744–753 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hiyama, A., Nagai, Y., Hirose, M., Kobayashi, M., Takagi, H.: Question first: Passive interaction model for gathering experience and knowledge from the elderly. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), pp. 151–156. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Itoko, T., Arita, S., Kobayashi, M., Takagi, H.: Involving senior workers in crowdsourced proofreading. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8515, pp. 106–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07446-7_11 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kobayashi, M., Arita, S., Itoko, T., Saito, S., Takagi, H.: Motivating multi-generational crowd workers in social-purpose work. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp. 1813–1824. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kobayashi, M., Ishihara, T., Itoko, T., Takagi, H., Asakawa, C.: Age-based task specialization for crowdsourced proofreading. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2013. LNCS, vol. 8010, pp. 104–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-39191-0_12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McMullin, J.A., Comeau, T.D., Jovic, E.: Generational affinities and discourses of difference: a case study of highly skilled informationtechnology workers. Brit. J. Sociol. 58(2), 297–316 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morrison, P., Murphy-Hill, E.: Is programming knowledge related to age? An exploration of stack overflow. In: 2013 10th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pp. 69–72, May 2013Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nimrod, G.: Seniors online communities: A quantitative content analysis. Gerontologist 50(3), 382–392 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nimrod, G.: Online communities as a resource in older adults tourism. J. Community Inf. 8(1), 33–43 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nimrod, G.: Probing the audience of seniors online communities. J. Gerontol. Ser. B: Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 68(5), 773–782 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nimrod, G.: The benefits of and constraints to participation in seniors online communities. Leisure Stud. 33(3), 247–266 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robat, C.: The History of Computing Project TimeLine History of Computing. Technical report, Accessed 02/03/2006) (2006). http://www.thocp.net/timeline/timeline.htm
  18. 18.
    Slavicek, T., Balata, J., Mikovec, Z.: Designing mobile phone interface for active seniors: User study in Czech Republic. In: 2014 5th IEEE Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), pp. 109–114, November 2014Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Polish-Japanese Academy of Information TechnologyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations