Advertisement

Social Contribution Settings and Newcomer Retention in Humanitarian Crowd Mapping

  • Martin DittusEmail author
  • Giovanni Quattrone
  • Licia Capra
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10047)

Abstract

Organisers of crowd mapping initiatives seek to identify practices that foster an active contributor community. Theory suggests that social contribution settings can provide important support functions for newcomers, yet to date there are no empirical studies of such an effect. We present the first study that evaluates the relationship between colocated practice and newcomer retention in a crowd mapping community, involving hundreds of first-time participants. We find that certain settings are associated with a significant increase in newcomer retention, as are regular meetings, and a greater mix of experiences among attendees. Factors relating to the setting such as food breaks and technical disruptions have comparatively little impact. We posit that successful social contribution settings serve as an attractor: they provide opportunities to meet enthusiastic contributors, and can capture prospective contributors who have a latent interest in the practice.

Keywords

Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team Crowdsourcing Crowd mapping Volunteering Mapathon Mapping party 

References

  1. 1.
    Baecker, R.M.: Readings in Human-Computer Interaction: Toward the Year 2000. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Budhathoki, N.R.: Participants’ motivations to contribute geographic information in an online community. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burke, M., Marlow, C., Lento, T.: Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI 2009, pp. 945–954. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choi, B., Alexander, K., Kraut, R.E., Levine, J.M.: Socialization tactics in Wikipedia and their effects. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2010, pp. 107–116. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ciampaglia, G.L., Taraborelli, D., Francisco, S.: MoodBar: increasing new user retention in Wikipedia through lightweight socialization. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2015, pp. 734–742 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clary, E.G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R.D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A.A., Haugen, J., Miene, P.: Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74(6), 1516 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dittus, M., Quattrone, G., Capra, L.: Analysing volunteer engagement in humanitarian mapping: building contributor communities at large scale. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2016, pp. 107–116. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fang, Y., Neufeld, D.: Understanding sustained participation in open source software projects. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 25(4), 9–50 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farzan, R., Kraut, R., Pal, A., Konstan, J.: Socializing volunteers in an online community: a field experiment. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2012, pp. 325–334. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M.M., Robins, J., Shoemaker, S.: Community development among distance learners: temporal and technological dimensions. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 6(1) (2000). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ISSN: 1083-6101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00114.x Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hristova, D., Quattrone, G., Mashhadi, A., Capra, L.: The life of the party: impact of social mapping in OpenStreetMap. In: Proceedings of ICWSM 2013, pp. 234–243 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johansen, R.: Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams. The Free Press, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nov, O.: What motivates Wikipedians? Commun. ACM 50(11), 60–64 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Perkins, C., Dodge, M.: The potential of user-generated cartography: a case study of the OpenStreetMap project and Mapchester mapping party. North West Geogr. 8(1), 19–32 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schervish, P.G., Havens, J.J.: Social participation and charitable giving: a multivariate analysis. Voluntas Int. J. Voluntary Nonprofit Organ. 8(3), 235–260 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Steinmacher, I., Gerosa, M.A., Redmiles, D.: Attracting, onboarding, and retaining newcomer developers in open source software projects. In: Workshop on Global Software Development in a CSCW Perspective (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Trainer, E.H., Chaihirunkarn, C., Kalyanasundaram, A., Herbsleb, J.D.: Community code engagements: summer of code & hackathons for community building in scientific software. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 111–121. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wilson, J.: Volunteering. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 26, 215–240 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Dittus
    • 1
    Email author
  • Giovanni Quattrone
    • 2
  • Licia Capra
    • 2
  1. 1.ICRI CitiesUCLLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUCLLondonUK

Personalised recommendations