How University Sustainable Development Research Can Impact the Local Community: The Links Between ESD and Dietary Choices

Chapter

Abstract

As dietary choices vary worldwide and contribute to a distinct identity, this study examined if links exist between various inhabitants’ motivating factors, including the environmental impact of meat production and the extent of meat consumption. Such a detailed investigation has never been undertaken at the local level and the results not only shed light on current consumption trends and the perspectives of the inhabitants of two Maltese Districts but also lead to formulate a way forward—Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) being the key to address the current situation for a sustainable future. The quantitative data was collected through a structured telephone survey involving 378 inhabitants from each of the two main islands, with the data then analyzed through SPSS software, employing both descriptive and inferential statistics. This revealed that the absolute majority of participants in both districts are meat eaters although their meat consumption patterns differ in frequency, and in the type of meat consumed. Gozitans lead in their preference for local meat and are more inclined to adhere to the traditional way of life, conforming to religious practices. The absolute majority are unaware of the negative environmental impact of meat production and consumption. This study reveals that geographical location does have an influential role in the dietary patterns of its inhabitants and that environmental attitudes are not a strong deciding factor. This study continues to uphold the vision that culture should be considered as one of the main pillars of ESD. In response to these findings, a model illustrating the emerging links between ESD and meat consumption is presented. This paper directly illustrates how university research can impact the local community and the study will undoubtedly prove beneficial to anyone interested in carrying out further research to establish links between ESD and dietary choices.

Keywords

Dietary choices Education for sustainable development Quantitative framework Culture as the fourth ESD pillar Applied university research 

References

  1. Bailey, R., & Harper, D. R. (2015). Reviewing interventions for healthy and sustainable diets (research paper). London: Chatham House, The Royal Institute of International Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/field/field_document/20150529HealthySustainableDietsBaileyHarper_0.pdf
  2. Beardsworth, A., & Bryman, A. (2004). Meat consumption and meat avoidance among young people: An 11-year longitudinal study. British Food Journal, 106(4), 313–327. doi:10.1108/00070700410529573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, D., & Valentine, G. (1997). Consuming Geographies—We are where we eat. London, UK & New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Boyadjieva, A., Cusack, M., Figueira, A. C., Gnielzyk, P., Graeffe, L., Gunnlaugsdόttir, S. A., et al. (2008). Education for Sustainable Development: “Images and Objects”—Active Methodology Toolkit. Hamar, Norway: The Consumer Citizenship Network, Hedmark University College. Retrieved from http://www.uganditk.ee/eng/ESD_Images.pdf
  5. Brick, J. M., & Lepkowski, J. (2006). The Role of Telephones in Multiple Frame, Multimode Surveys. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Telephone Survey Methodology (TSM II), January 11–15, 2006, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
  6. Briguglio, L., & Pace, P. J. (2004). Education for Sustainable Development in Malta. Retrieved from http://www.um.edu.mt/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/63861/education_esd_lbriguglio_ppace.pdf
  7. Brooks, C. (2004). Consequences of increased global meat consumption on the global environment—trade in virtual water, energy and nutrients. Retrieved from Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment website: https://woods.stanford.edu/environmental-venture-projects/consequences-increased-global-meat-consumption-global-environment
  8. Brown, F. (2009, September 2). Meat consumption per capita. The guardian. Retrieved form http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/datablog/2009/sep/02/meat-consumption-per-capita-climate-change
  9. Burlingame, B., & Dernini, S. (2012). Sustainable diets and biodiversity: Directions and solutions for policy, research and action. Proceedings of the International Scientific Symposium. Biodiversity and sustainable diets united against hunger, November 3–5, 2010. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization & Biodiversity International.Google Scholar
  10. Centre for Environmental Education (CEE). (2007). Moving forward from Ahmedabad. Environmental education in the 21st century. Recommendations adopted by the 4th International Environmental Education Conference Delegates on 28th November 2007 in Ahmedabad, India. Retrieved from http://www.tbilisiplus30.org/Final%20Recommendations.pdf
  11. Chemnitz, C., & Becheva, S. (2014). Meat Atlas: Facts and figures about the animals we eat. Berlin, Germany: Heinrich Böll Stiftung & Brussels, Belgium: Friends of the Earth.Google Scholar
  12. Civitello, L. (2008). Cuisine and Culture—A History of Food and People (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Courtenay-Hall, P., & Rogers, L. (2002). Guys in Mind: Problems in environmental knowledge-behaviour modelling research. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 283–297. doi:10.1080/13504620220145438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erb, K.-H., Mayer, A., Kastner, T., Sallet, K.-E., & Haberl, H. (2012). The impact of industrial grain fed livestock Production on food security: An extended literature review. Vienna-Graz, Austria: Institute of Social Ecology, Alpen-Adria University Klagenfurt.Google Scholar
  16. European Commission (EC). (2014). Sustainable Food. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/food.htm
  17. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2009). The State of Food and Agriculture—Livestock in the balance. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i0680e/i0680e.pdf
  18. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2011). World Livestock 2011—Livestock in food security. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2373e/i2373e.pdf
  19. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2012). Sustainable Diets and Biodiversity—Directions and solutions for policy, research and action. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i3004e/i3004e.pdf
  20. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2014). FAOSTAT. Retrieved from http://faostat.fao.org
  21. Garnett, T. (2014). What is a sustainable healthy diet? A discussion paper. Food Climate Research. Retrieved from http://www.fcrn.org.uk/sites/default/files/fcrn_what_is_a_sustainable_healthy_diet_final.pdf
  22. Gerber, P. J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., et al. (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock—A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).Google Scholar
  23. Greenpeace International. (2009). Agriculture at a Crossroads: Food for Survival (p. 62). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Greenpeace International. Retrieved from http://www.greenpeace.org/france/PageFiles/266577/iaastd-rapport-en-anglais.pdf
  24. Groves, R. M. (1990). Theories and methods of telephone surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 221–240. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.001253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hartung, J. (2013). A short history of livestock production. In A. Aland & T. Banhazi (Eds.), Livestock housing—Modern management to ensure optimal health and welfare of farm animals (pp. 21–34). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heylighen, F. (1992). A cognitive-systemic reconstruction of Maslow’s theory of self-actualization. Behavioural Science, 37(1), 39–58. doi:10.1002/bs.3830370105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Horrigan, L., Lawrence, R., & Walker, P. (2002). How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110(5), 445–456. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1240832/pdf/ehp0110-000445.pdf
  28. Johnston, J. L., Fanzo, J. C., & Cogill, B. (2014). Understanding sustainable diets: A descriptive analysis of the determinants and processes that influence diets and their impact on health, food security, and environmental sustainability. Advances in Nutrition, 5, 418–429. doi:10.3945/an.113.005553.418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kennedy, G. (2002). Global trends in dietary energy supply from 1961 to 1999. Food Nutrition and Agriculture, 30, 53–60.Google Scholar
  30. Kliewer, G. (2008). Maltese bread: A changing symbol of the island’s identity. Omertaa, Journal for Applied Anthropology, 211–218. Retrieved from http://www.omertaa.org/archive/omertaa0028.pdf
  31. Lang, T., & Heasman, M. (2004). Food Wars: The global battle for mouths, minds and markets. London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  32. Mamo, S. (2012). Maltese and Gozitans: A social identity approach (Unpublished bachelors in psychology degree (Hons.) dissertation), University of Malta, Malta.Google Scholar
  33. Mifsud, M. (2011a). Maltese youth and the environment: A qualitative study. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 12(2), 110–129. doi:10.2478/v10099-009-0058-6.Google Scholar
  34. Mifsud, M. (2011b). Factors influencing environmental knowledge of Maltese youth. Environmental Scientist, 20(2), 271–287. ISSN-09668411.Google Scholar
  35. Mifsud, M. (2012). Environmental education development in Malta: A contextual study of the events that have shaped the development of environmental education in Malta. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14(1), 52–66. doi:10.2478/v10099-012-0004-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ministry for Resources and Rural Affairs. (2012). National climate change adaptation strategy. Floriana, Malta: Ministry for Resources and Rural Affairs.Google Scholar
  37. Ministry of Education and Employment. (2012). A National curriculum framework for all. Tas-Sliema, Malta: Salesian Press.Google Scholar
  38. National Statistics Office (NSO). (2007). Census of population and housing 2005 (Vol. 2): Dwellings. Valletta, Malta: National Statistics Office.Google Scholar
  39. National Statistics Office (NSO). (2010). Household Budgetary Survey 2008. Valletta, Malta: National Statistics Office. Retrieved from http://www.nso.gov.mt/statdoc/document_file.aspx?id=2833
  40. National Statistics Office (NSO). (2013a). Malta in figures 2013. Valletta, Malta: National Statistics Office.Google Scholar
  41. National Statistics Office (NSO). (2013b). World environment day 2013 [news release]. Valletta, Malta: National Statistics Office.Google Scholar
  42. National Statistics Office (NSO). (2014). Census of population and housing 2011: Final report. Valletta, Malta: National Statistics Office.Google Scholar
  43. Perner, L. (2010). Consumer behaviour: The psychology of marketing. Retrieved from http://www.consumerpsychologist.com/
  44. Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production. (2008). Putting meat on the table: Industrial farm animal production in America. Philadelphia and Baltimore: Pew Charitable Trusts and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Retrieved from http://www.ncifap.org/_images/PCIFAPFin.pdf
  45. Robinson, T. P., Thornton, P. K., Franceschini, G., Kruska, R. L., Chiozza, F., Notenbaert, A., … See, L. (2011). Global livestock production systems. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) & International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).Google Scholar
  46. Scollan, N., Moran, D., Joong Kim, E., & Thomas, C. (2010, July 2). The environmental impact of meat production systems. Report to the International Meat Secretariat. Retrieved from http://www.meat-ims.org/old-site/IMSReview-final-20710.pdf
  47. Smith, J., Sones, K., Grace, D., MacMillan, S., Tarawali, S., & Herrero, M. (2013). Beyond milk, meat, and eggs: Role of livestock in food and nutrition security. Animal Frontiers, 3(1), 6–13. doi:10.2527/af.2013-0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sonesson, U., Davis, J., & Ziegler, F. (2010). Food production and emissions of greenhouse: An overview of the climate impact of different product groups. Gothenburg, Sweden: SIK—The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology.Google Scholar
  49. Southgate, D. A. T. (1997). Demand for healthful meat, poultry and fish products. In A. M. Pearson & T. R. Dutson (Eds.), Advances in meat research series—Production and processing of healthy meat, poultry and fish products (pp. 1–29). London, UK: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Statistical report on the sickness, mortality and invaliding among the troops in the United Kingdom, the Mediterranean and the British America. (1839). In J. Johnson, & H. J. Johnson (Eds.), The Medico-Chirurgical Review, & Journal of Practical Medicine (Vol. 31, pp. 10–24). New York, NY: Richard & George S. Wood.Google Scholar
  51. Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
  52. Tanner, K. (2002). Survey Research. In H. Williamson (Ed.), Research methods for students, academics and professionals—Information management and systems (2nd ed., pp. 89–109). Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia: Charles Sturt University, Centre for Information Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2002). Education for sustainability: From Rio to Johannesburg: Lessons learnt from a decade of commitment. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
  54. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2009). Bonn declaration. In Proceedings of World Conference on Education for Sustainable Development, Paris, France, March 31–April 2, 2009. Retrieved from http://www.esd-world-conference-2009.org/fileadmin/download/ESD2009_BonnDeclaration080409.pdf
  55. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2012). Education for sustainable development sourcebook. Education for sustainable development in action: Learning and training tools, no. 4. Paris, France: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002163/216383e.pdf
  56. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2014). Education for sustainable development. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/leading-the-international-agenda/education-for-sustainable-development/education-for-sustainable-development/
  57. University of Cambridge. (2014, September 1). Changing global diets is vital to reducing climate change. Retrieved from http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/changing-global-diets-is-vital-to-reducing-climate-change
  58. Wedderburn-Bisshop, G., & Pavlidis, L. (2011). Livestock production—And shorter lived climate forcers. Surrey, England: World Preservation Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.worldpreservationfoundation.org/Downloads/Livestock-Production-World-Preservation-Foundation.pdf
  59. World Health Organization (WHO). (1986). Formulation of a nutrition policy. Report of the First Conference on Nutrition in Malta, Floriana, August 25–30, 1986. Cited by Bellizzi, M. (1993). The Changing eating of the Maltese in Options Méditerranéennes, Sér B/no. 7 (p. 58). Malta: Food, Agriculture, Fisheries and the Environment.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of MaltaMsidaMalta
  2. 2.Centre for Environmental Education Research (CEER)University of MaltaMsidaMalta

Personalised recommendations