Skip to main content

Model Checking Real-Time Properties on the Functional Layer of Autonomous Robots

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Formal Methods and Software Engineering (ICFEM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10009))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Software is an essential part of robotic systems. As robots and autonomous systems are more and more deployed in human environments, we need to use elaborate validation and verification techniques in order to gain a higher level of trust in our systems. This motivates our determination to apply formal verification methods to robotics software. In this paper, we describe our results obtained using model-checking on the functional layer of an autonomous robot. We implement an automatic translation from GenoM, a robotics model-based software engineering framework, to the formal specification language Fiacre. This translation takes into account the semantics of the robotics middleware. TINA, our model-checking toolbox, can be used on the synthesized models to prove real-time properties of the functional modules implementation on the robot. We illustrate our approach using a realistic autonomous navigation example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://git.openrobots.org/projects/openprs.

  2. 2.

    https://www.openrobots.org/wiki/eltclsh.

  3. 3.

    Codels (code elements) are the programmer implementation of the specified service, broken down to small chunks of C or C++ code.

  4. 4.

    https://git.openrobots.org/projects/pocolibs/gollum/index.

  5. 5.

    http://rmp.segway.com/tag/rmp400/.

  6. 6.

    The template still provides the user with the possibility to specify their hardware constraints.

References

  1. Abdeddaïm, Y., Asarin, E., Gallien, M., Ingrand, F., Lesire, C., Sighireanu, M.: Planning robust temporal plans: a comparison between CBTP and TGA approaches. In: ICAPS (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abdellatif, T., Bensalem, S., Combaz, J., de Silva, L., Ingrand, F.: Rigorous design of robot software: a formal component-based approach. Robot. Auton. Syst. 60, 1563–1578 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abid, N., Dal Zilio, S., Le Botlan, D.: A formal framework to specify and verify real-time properties on critical systems. Int. J. Crit. Comput. Based Syst. 5(1), 4–30 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Basu, A., Bozga, M., Sifakis, J.: Modeling heterogeneous real-time components in BIP. In: SEFM, pp. 3–12 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bensalem, S., Bozga, M., Nguyen, T.-H., Sifakis, J.: D-Finder: a tool for compositional deadlock detection and verification. In: Bouajjani, A., Maler, O. (eds.) CAV 2009. LNCS, vol. 5643, pp. 614–619. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Berthomieu, B., Bodeveix, J.-P., Farail, P., Filali, M., Garavel, H., Gaufillet, P., Lang, F., Vernadat, F.: Fiacre: an intermediate language for model verification in the topcased environment. In: ERTS, HAL - CCSD, Toulouse (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berthomieu, B., Dal Zilio, S., Fronc, Ł.: Model-checking real-time properties of an aircraft landing gear system using fiacre. In: Boniol, F., Wiels, V., Ait Ameur, Y., Schewe, K.-D. (eds.) ABZ 2014. CCIS, vol. 433, pp. 110–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Berthomieu, B., Menasche, M.: An enumerative approach for analyzing time Petri nets. IFIP Congr. Ser. 9, 41–46 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berthomieu, B., Ribet, P.-O., Vernadat, F.: The tool TINA - construction of abstract state spaces for Petri nets and Time Petri. Int. J. Prod. Res. 42(14), 2741–2756 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Berthomieu, B., Vernadat, F.: State Space Abstractions for Time Petri Nets. Handbook of Real-Time and Embedded Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Bourdil, P.-A., Berthomieu, B., Jenn, E.: Model-checking real-time properties of an auto flight control system function. In: IEEE ISSREW (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boussinot, F., de Simone, R.: The ESTEREL Language. In: Proceeding of the IEEE, pp. 1293–1304, September 1991

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brat, G., Denney, E., Giannakopoulou, D., Frank, J., Jónsson, A.K.: Verification of autonomous systems for space applications. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brugali, D.: Model-driven software engineering in robotics. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 22(3), 155–166 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bruyninckx, H.: Open robot control software: the OROCOS project. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cimatti, A., Roveri, M., Bertoli, P.: Conformant planning via symbolic model checking and heuristic search. Artif. Intell. 159, 127–206 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Dolginova, E., Lynch, N.: Safety verification for automated platoon maneuvers: a case study. In: Maler, O. (ed.) HART 1997. LNCS, vol. 1201, pp. 154–170. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Dwyer, M.B., Avrunin, G.S., Corbett, J.C.: Patterns in property specifications for finite-state verification. In: ICSE (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Espiau, B., Kapellos, K., Jourdan, M.: Formal verification in robotics: why and how? In: Giralt, G., Hirzinge, G. (eds.) Robotics Research. Springer, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gobillot, N., Lesire, C., Doose, D.: A modeling framework for software architecture specification and validation. In: Brugali, D., Broenink, J.F., Kroeger, T., MacDonald, B.A. (eds.) SIMPAR 2014. LNCS, vol. 8810, pp. 303–314. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hähnel, D., Burgard, W., Lakemeyer, G.: GOLEX—bridging the gap between logic (GOLOG) and a real robot. In: Herzog, O. (ed.) KI 1998. LNCS, vol. 1504, pp. 165–176. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Ingrand, F., Ghallab, M.: Deliberation for autonomous robots: a survey. Artif. Intell. 1–40 (2014). Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ingrand, F., Lacroix, S., Lemai-Chenevier, S., Py, F.: Decisional autonomy of planetary rovers. J. Field Robot. 24(7), 559–580 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mallet, A., Pasteur, C., Herrb, M., Lemaignan, S., Ingrand, F.: GenoM3: building middleware-independent robotic components. In: IEEE ICRA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maraninchi, F.: Operational and compositional semantics of synchronous automaton compositions. In: Cleaveland, W.R. (ed.) CONCUR 1992. LNCS, vol. 630, pp. 550–564. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Merlin, P.M., Farber, D.J.: Recoverability of communication protocols: implications of a theoretical study. IEEE Trans. Commun. 24(9), 1036–1043 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Quigley, M., Gerkey, B., Conley, K., Faust, J., Foote, T., Leibs, J., Berger, E., Wheeler, R., Ng, A.Y.: ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System. In: IEEE ICRA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rangra, S., Gaudin, E.: SDL to Fiacre translation. In: Embedded Real-Time Software and Systems, Toulouse (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Simmons, R., Pecheur, C.: Automating model checking for autonomous systems. In: AAAI Spring Symposium on Real-Time Autonomous Systems (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Simon, D., Joubert, A.: ORCCAD: towards an open robot controller computer aided design system. Technical report, Research report 1396, INRIA (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Täubig, H.H., Frese, U., Hertzberg, C., Lüth, C., Mohr, S., Vorobev, E., Walter, D.: Guaranteeing functional safety: design for provability and computer-aided verification. Auton. Robots 32(3), 303–331 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wongpiromsarn, T., Murray, R.M.: Formal verification of an autonomous vehicle system. In: Conference on Decision and Control, May 2008

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported in part by the EU CPSE Labs project funded by the H2020 program under grant agreement No. 644400.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Foughali .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Foughali, M., Berthomieu, B., Dal Zilio, S., Ingrand, F., Mallet, A. (2016). Model Checking Real-Time Properties on the Functional Layer of Autonomous Robots. In: Ogata, K., Lawford, M., Liu, S. (eds) Formal Methods and Software Engineering. ICFEM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10009. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47846-3_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47846-3_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47845-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47846-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics