Skip to main content

Gossip’s Bad Reputation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gossip, Epistemology, and Power
  • 629 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter surveys the history of gossip from its origins in intimacy to its current degraded status as trivial, false, or malicious.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Works Cited

  • Alcoff, Linda. 2003. Introduction. In Singing in the Fire: Stories of Women in Philosophy, ed. Linda Alcoff. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. Edwin. 2004. Autonomy and Informational Privacy, or Gossip: The Central Meaning of the First Amendment. Social Philosophy and Policy 21 (2): 215–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakewell, Sarah. 2016. At the Existentialist Café: Freedom, Being, and Apricot Cocktails. New York: Other Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. 2010 [1978]. A Lover’s Discourse: Fragments. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoletti, Tommaso, and Lorenzo Magnani. 2014. An Epistemological Analysis of Gossip and Gossip-Based Knowledge. Synthese 191: 4037–4067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besnier, Niko. 2009. Gossip and the Everyday Production of Politics. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, Paul, and Stephen Nissenbaum. 1976. Salem Possessed: The Social Origin of Witchcraft. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brison, Karen. 1992. Just Talk: Gossip, Meetings, and Power in a Papua New Guinea Village. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chesler, Phyllis. 2001. Woman’s Inhumanity to Woman. New York: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coast, David. 2012. Misinformation and Disinformation in Late Jacobean Court Politics. Journal of Early Modern History 16: 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. Rhetorical Spaces: Essays on Gendered Locations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, Alexander. 2011. Seeing is Believing: Urban Gossip and the Balcony in Early Modern Venice. Gender & History 23: 721–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, Jeffrey David. 1990. Shame, Witchcraft, and Social Control: The Case of an Awa-Coaiquer Interloper. Cultural Anthropology 5 (3): 338–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, Elizabeth. 2005 [1983]. The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, Norbert, and John L. Scotson. 1965. The Established and the Outsiders: The Collected Works of Norbert Elias. Vol. 4. Dublin: University College Dublin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emler, Nicholas. 1994. Gossip, Reputation, and Social Adaptation. In Good Gossip, ed. Robert Goodman and Aaron Ben-Ze’ev, 117–138. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenves, Peter. 1993. “Chatter”: Language and History in Kierkegaard. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forni, P.M. 2002. Choosing Civility: The Twenty-Five Rules of Considerate Conduct. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy. 1990. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text 25 (26): 56–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman, Max. 1963. Gossip and Scandal. Current Anthropology 4 (3): 307–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992 [1983]. Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1991 [1962]. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallett, Tim, Brent Harger, and Donna Eder. 2009. Gossip at Work: Unsanctioned Evaluative Talk in Formal School Meetings. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 38 (5): 584–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haviland, John Beard. 1977. Gossip, Reputation, and Knowledge in Zincantan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. Trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horodowich, Elizabeth. 2008. Language and Statecraft in Early Modern Venice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, John. 2012. The Conclave from the ‘Outside In’: Rumor, Speculation, and Disorder in Rome During Early Modern Papal Elections. Journal of Early Modern History 16: 355–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Deborah. 1980. Gossip: Notes on Women’s Oral Culture. Women’s Studies International Quarterly 3: 193–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kniffin, Kevin M., and David Sloan Wilson. 2010. Evolutionary Perspectives on Workplace Gossip: Why and How Gossip Can Serve Groups. Group & Organization Management 35 (2): 150–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentz, Tony. 1989. Orality and Literacy in Hellenic Greece. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilti, Antoine. 2005. The World of the Salons: Sociability and Worldliness in Eighteenth-Century Paris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDowell, Douglas M. 1986. The Law in Classical Athens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIlvenna, Una. 2012. Word Versus Honor: The Case of Françoise de Rohan vs. Jacques de Savoie. Journal of Early Modern History 16: 315–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merry, Sally Engle. 1984. Rethinking Gossip and Scandal. In Toward a General Theory of Social Control, vol. 1: Fundamentals. ed. Donald Black, 271–302. Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi, Alex, Andrew Whiten, and Robin Dunbar. 2006. A Bias for Social Information in Human Cultural Transmission. British Journal of Psychology 97: 405–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992b. Twice-Born Tales from Kathmandu: Stories That Tell People. Doctoral dissertation. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Judith. 2015. The Story: A Reporter’s Journey. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neusner, Jacob. 1991. The Mishnah: A New Translation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Walter. 1982. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, Steve. 1995. ‘Coffee Politicians Does Create’: Coffeehouses and Restoration Political Culture. The Journal of Modern History 67 (4): 807–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Virginia. 2014. Governed by Gossip: The Personal Letters and Public Purpose of Philip Ludwell in Early-Eighteenth-Century Virginia. In Feeley and Frost, When Private Talk Goes Public: Gossip in American History, 58–77. doi:10.1057/9781137442307_4.

  • ———. 2015. Women’s Groups Urge Colleges and Government to Rein in Yik Yak. Chronicle of Higher Education, March 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram, Sanford, Bent Flyvbjerg, and Todd Landman. 2013. Political Political Science: A Phronetic Approach. New Political Science 35 (3): 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, Maureen. 2016. Why Aren’t Women Doing Better on Wall Street? The New York Times, January 24. Opinion, pp. 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibutani, Tamotsu. 1966. Improvised News: A Sociological Study of Rumor. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signorile, Michelangelo. 1993. Queer in America: Sex, the Media, and the Closets of Power. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeltzer, Larry. 1991. An Analysis of Strategies for Announcing Organization-Wide Change. Group & Organization Studies 16 (1): 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solove, D. 2008. The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiku, Nitasha. 2014. Women Won’t Name Harassing Venture Capitalists, Even Anonymously. Valleywag, August 8. http://valleywag.gawker.com/women-wont-name-harassing-venture-capitalists-even-ano-1618352306. Accessed 1 Aug 2015.

  • Turner, Patricia A. 1993. I Heard it Through the Grapevine: Rumor in African-American Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Niekerk, Jason. 2008. The Virtue of Gossip. South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (4): 400–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westacott, Emrys. 2012. The Virtues of Our Vices: A Modest Defense of Gossip, Rudeness, and Other Bad Habits. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, Chris. 1998. Gossip and Resistance Among the Medieval Peasantry. Past and Present 160: 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Colin, and Colin Seaman. 1985. Scandal! Briarcliff Manor: Stein and Day.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adkins, K. (2017). Gossip’s Bad Reputation. In: Gossip, Epistemology, and Power . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47840-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics