Skip to main content

Human Factors in the Adoption of Model-Driven Engineering: An Educator’s Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Conceptual Modeling (ER 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9975))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper complements previous empirical studies on teaching Model-driven Engineering (MDE) by reporting on the authors’ attempt at introducing MDE to undergrad students. This is important because: (1) today’s students are tomorrow’s professionals and industrial adoption depends also on the availability of trained professionals and (2) observing problems in the introduction of MDE in the more controlled environment of a classroom setting allows us to identify additional adoption factors, more at the individual level, to be taken into account after in industrial settings. As we report herein, this attempt was largely unsuccessful. We will analyze what went wrong, what we learned from the process and the implications this has for both future endeavors of introducing MDE in both educational and professional environments, particularly regarding human/socio-technical factors to be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.webratio.com/.

  2. 2.

    It is worth mentioning the discussion in the blog post http://modeling-languages.com/failed-convince-students-benefits-code-generation/ explaining the first author’s preliminary observations that ended up with over four thousand visits and thirty comments (from people with different backgrounds like tool vendors: MetaCase, WebRatio, Softeam, consultants and end-users) and the submission of that same post on reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2vehhm/i_failed_to_convince_my_students_about_the/ that brought sixty-five additional comments. Besides these two, additional discussions on these results took place in other forums like a number of LinkedIn groups.

  3. 3.

    https://www.mendix.com/.

  4. 4.

    See an (incomplete) list, taken from the set of instructors that declare to be using [3] in courses, here: https://www.sites.google.com/site/mdsebook/courses.

References

  1. Acerbis, R., Bongio, A., Brambilla, M., Tisi, M., Ceri, S., Tosetti, E.: Developing eBusiness solutions with a model driven approach: the case of acer EMEA. In: Baresi, L., Fraternali, P., Houben, G.-J. (eds.) ICWE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4607, pp. 539–544. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73597-7_51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Akayama, S., Hisazumi, K., Hiya, S., Fukuda, A.: Using model-driven development tools for object-oriented modeling education. In: Educators’ Symposium, 16th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2013) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brambilla, M., Cabot, J., Wimmer, M.: Model-Driven Software Engineering in Practice. Synthesis Lectures on Software Engineering. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brambilla, M., Fraternali, P.: Large-scale model-driven engineering of web user interaction: the webml and webratio experience. Sci. Comput. Program. 89, 71–87 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brambilla, M., Fraternali, P.: Interaction Flow Modeling Language. The MK/OMG Press, Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brunelière, H., Cabot, J., Dupé, G., Madiot, F.: Modisco: a model driven reverse engineering framework. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56(8), 1012–1032 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Budgen, D., Burn, A.J., Brereton, O.P., Kitchenham, B.A., Pretorius, R.: Empirical evidence about the uml: a systematic literature review. Softw. Prac. Exp. 41(4), 363–392 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cataldo, M., Herbsleb, J.D., Carley, K.M.: Socio-technical congruence: a framework for assessing the impact of technical and work dependencies on software development productivity. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2008, pp. 2–11 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cuadrado, J.S., Izquierdo, J.L.C., Molina, J.G.: Applying model-driven engineering in small software enterprises. Sci. Comput. Program. 89, 176–198 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Diaz, O., Villoria, F.M.: Generating blogs out of product catalogues: an MDE approach. J. Syst. Softw. 83(10), 1970–1982 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dobing, B., Parsons, J.: How UML is used. Commun. ACM 49(5), 109–113 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dzidek, W.J., Arisholm, E., Briand, L.C.: A realistic empirical evaluation of the costs and benefits of UML in software maintenance. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 34(3), 407–432 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernández-Sáez, A.M., Caivano, D., Genero, M., Chaudron, M.R.V.: On the use of UML documentation in software maintenance: results from a survey in industry. In: 18th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, MoDELS 2015, pp. 292–301 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hutchinson, J., Whittle, J., Rouncefield, M.: Model-driven engineering practices in industry: social, organizational and managerial factors that lead to success or failure. Sci. Comput. Program. 89, 144–161 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iqbal, M.Z., Ali, S., Yue, T., Briand, L.C.: Applying UML/MARTE on industrial projects: challenges, experiences, and guidelines. Softw. Syst. Model. 14(4), 1367–1385 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jouault, F., Allilaire, F., Bézivin, J., Kurtev, I.: ATL: a model transformation tool. Sci. Comput. Program. 72(1–2), 31–39 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Mellor, S.J., Balcer, M.: Executable UML: A Foundation for Model-Driven Architectures. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Petre, M.: Uml in practice. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2013, Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 722–731. IEEE Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Petre, M.: “no shit” or “oh, shit!”: responses to observations on the use of UML in professional practice. Softw. Syst. Model. 13(4), 1225–1235 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Sangra, A.: A new learning model for the information and knowledge society: the case of the universitat oberta de catalunya (uoc), spain. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 2(2) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Steinberg, D., Budinsky, F., Paternostro, M., Merks, E.: EMF: Eclipse Modeling Framework 2.0, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vallecillo, A.: On the industrial adoption of model driven engineering. is your company ready for mde? Int. J. Inf. Syst. Softw. Eng. Big Co. 1(1), 52–68 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Whittle, J., Hutchinson, J., Rouncefield, M.: The state of practice in model-driven engineering. IEEE Softw. 31(3), 79–85 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi Cabot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cabot, J., Kolovos, D.S. (2016). Human Factors in the Adoption of Model-Driven Engineering: An Educator’s Perspective. In: Link, S., Trujillo, J. (eds) Advances in Conceptual Modeling. ER 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9975. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47717-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47717-6_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47716-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47717-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics