Skip to main content

Assessing Programming by Written Examinations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 642))

Abstract

This position paper discusses the assessment of programming courses by means of written examinations. It describes the various learning outcomes of programming that should be covered, and then discusses how well they can be covered in a written examination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ACM: CS2013 Computer Science Curriculum 2013: Final Report. Technical report (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. AERA, Apa, NCME: Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA Publications, Washington, DC (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Desjarlais, M., Smith, P.: A comparative analysis of reflection and self-assessment. Int. J. Process Educ. 3(1), 3–18 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haghighi, P., Sheard, J.: Summative computer programming assessment using both paper and computer. In: Proceedings ICCE 2005, pp. 67–75. Singapore (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. SAQA: National policy and criteria for designing and implementing assessment for NQF qualifications and part-qualifications and professional designations in South Africa (2015). http://www.saqa.org.za/list.php?e=Policy

  6. Suskie, L.: Assessing Student Learning: A Common Sense Guide, 2nd edn. Jossey Bass, San Francisco (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tucker, K., Derelian, D., Rouner, D.: Building the case: Position papers, back-grounders, fact sheets, and biographical sketches. In: Public Relations Writing: An Issue-driven Behavioral Approach, pp. 79–85. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. U.S. Department of Education: Testing Integrity Symposium: Issues and Recommendations for Best Practice (2013). http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/2013454.pdf

  9. Western Carolina University: Handbook for program assessment in administrative/educational support units (2007). http://www.wcu.edu/WebFiles/PDFs/AssessmentHandbook_AES.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken Halland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Halland, K. (2016). Assessing Programming by Written Examinations. In: Gruner, S. (eds) ICT Education. SACLA 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 642. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47680-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47680-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47679-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47680-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics